Journals / Gazi Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Magnetic Resonance Guided Stereotactic Biopsy of Intracranial Lesions: Analysis of 310 Cases

İntrakranyal Lezyonlarda Magnetik Rezonans Kılavuzluğunda Stereotaktik Biyopsi ile 310 Vakanın Analizi

Pages
327–330
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Histopathological diagnostic success was 99% Conclusion:The results of our study show that the stereotactic biopsy procedure applied in the MRI guideline is reliable and feasible with low complication rate and high effectiveness in cases where definitive histopathologic results are required for treatment planning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Stereotaxic biopsy is an important surgical procedure that provides definite diagnosis in brain lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to present our experience of magnetic resonance (MR) guided 310 stereotaxic biopsies in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Histopathological diagnostic success was 99% Conclusion:The results of our study show that the stereotactic biopsy procedure applied in the MRI guideline is reliable and feasible with low complication rate and high effectiveness in cases where definitive histopathologic results are required for treatment planning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Stereotaxic biopsy is an important surgical procedure that provides definite diagnosis in brain lesions. It is possible to obtain diagnosis with minimal invasive manner in deeply located and critical localized lesions . There are large case series in the literature. We aimed to present our experience of magnetic resonance (MR) guided 310 stereotaxic biopsies in this study. Method:We retrospectively evaluated age and gender distribution, locations of the lesions, histopathologic results, and complications of 310 cases which MR guided stereotactic biopsied was performed in our clinic between 2012 and 2018. In addition, technical information was also provided. Results:Stereotactic frame application was performed with local anesthesia and surgical procedure was performed by under general anesthesia. Of 310 patients 169 were male (55%) and were 141 female (45%). Mean age was 57.28 (3-87). 184 of the lesions were hemispheric (59%), and the most common diagnosis was glioblastoma multiforme (34.19%). 8 patients were not diagnosed (2%). Complications developed in 13 cases (4%) and 2 of cases were died in the early phase due to the procedure (0.6%). Histopathological diagnostic success was 99% Conclusion:The results of our study show that the stereotactic biopsy procedure applied in the MRI guideline is reliable and feasible with low complication rate and high effectiveness in cases where definitive histopathologic results are required for treatment planning.

Özet

Giriş:Stereotaksik biyopsi nöroonkolojide klinisyeni tanıya götüren önemli bircerrahi prosedürdür. Derin yerleşimli ve kritik lokalizasyonlu lezyonlardaminimal invaziv olarak tanı elde etmek mümkün hale gelmiştir. Literatürdegeniş vaka serileri bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmamızda 310 vakalık manyetikrezonans görüntüleme (MRG) kılavuzlu stereotaksik biyopsi deneyimimizinsunulması amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem:Kliniğimizde 2012 -2018 yılları arasında gerçekleştirilen, hedefinbelirlenmesi için MRG yöntemi kullanılan, 310vakanın, yaş ve cinsiyetdağılımları,stereotaktik biyopsi uygulanan lezyonları yerleri, materyallerininhistopatolojik sonuçları,ve gelişen komplikasyonlarıretrospektif olarakdeğerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca teknik ile ilgili de bilgi verilmiştir.Bulgular:Lokal anestezi altında stereotaktik çerçevenin takılmasını takibenyapılan MRG ile hesaplamalar sonrası, ameliyathane şartlarında genelanestezi uygulanılarak stereotaktik biyopsi işlemi uygulanmıştır. Hastalarınortalama yaşları 57.28 (3-87) olarak saptandı. Hastaların 169’u erkek (%55),141’i kadındı (%45). Lezyonların 184’ünün hemisferik yerleşimli olduğu (%59),en sık saptanan tanının glioblastoma multiforme olduğu (%34.19) görüldü. 8hastada tanı koyulamadığı görüldü (%2). Toplam 13 olguda komplikasyongeliştiği (%4), 2 hastanın işleme bağlı erken dönemde eksitus olduğu görüldü(%0.6). Hastaların 307’sinde tanı elde edildiği (%99) görüldü.Sonuç:Çalışmamızın sonuçları, tedavi planlaması için kesin histopatolojiksonuçların gerekli olduğu olgularda,MRGkılavuzluğunda uygulananstereotaktik biyopsi işleminin, düşük komplikasyon oranı ve etkinliğinedeniyle, güvenilir ve uygulanabilir olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARDEŞ, Ö., TUFAN, K., DURDAĞ, E., ÇİVİ, S., SÜNER, H. İ. (2022). Magnetic Resonance Guided Stereotactic Biopsy of Intracranial Lesions: Analysis of 310 Cases. Gazi Medical Journal, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 327–330. https://ajindex.com/articles/519790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Apuzzo ML, Chandrasoma PT, Cohen D, Zee CS, Zelman V:Computed imaging stereotaxy: Experience and perspectiverelated to 500 procedures applied to brain masses.Neurosurgery 1987;20: 930–7.
  2. Barlas O, Bayındır Ç, Can M, İdrisoğlu HA, Savaş A, Miyandoabci S: Image guided stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors. A study of 211 cases. Med Bull Istanbul 1994;27:64-9.
  3. Bernstein M, Parrent AG: Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurosurg 1994;81: 165-8.
  4. Chandrasoma PT, Smith MM, Apuzzo ML: Stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis of brain masses: comparison of results of biopsy and resected surgical specimen. Neurosurgery 1989;24: 160-5.
  5. Chernov M, Muragaki Y, Taira T, Iseki H: H-MRS-guided stereotactic brain biopsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2012;90: 63-5.
  6. Dammers R, Schouten JW, Haitsma IK, Vincent AJPE, Kros JM, Dirven CMF: Towards improving the safety and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in a single centre. Acta Neurochir 2010;152: 1915-21.
  7. Erşahin M, Karaarslan N, Gürbüz MS, Hakan T, Berkman MZ, Ekinci O, Denizli N, Aker FV: The safety and diagnostic value of frame-based and CT-guided stereotactic brain biopsy technique. Turk Neurosurg 2011;21: 582-90. Hall WA: The safety and eff icacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Cancer 1998;82: 1749-55.
  8. Heper AO, Erden E, Savas A, Ceyhan K, Erden I, Akyar S, Kanpolat Y: An analysis of stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors and nonneoplastic lesions: A prospective clinicopathologic study. Surg Neurol 2005;64: 82-8.
  9. Kickengereder P, Willeit P, Simon T, Ruge M: Diagnostic value and safety of stereotactic biopsy for brainstem tumors: A systematic review and analysis of 1480 cases. Neurosurg 2013;72: 873-82.
  10. Krieger MD, Chandrasoma PT, Zee CS, Apuzzo ML: Role of stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis and management of brain tumors. Semin Surg Oncol 1998;14: 13-25. Savaş A: Beyin biyopsisi–Stereotaktik cerrahi tekniği. Temel Nöroşirürji, Cilt 1, Ankara: Türk Nöroşirürji Derneği Yayınları, 2010: 1999-2003
  11. Waters JD, Gonda DD, Reddy H, Kasper EM, Warnke PC, Chen CC: Diagnostic yield of stereotactic needle biopsies of subcubic centimeter intracranial lesions. Surg Neurol Int 2013; 4 Suppl 3: 176–81. Leksell L: A stereotaxic apparatus for intracerebral neurosurgery. Acta Chir Scand 9:229–253, 1949
  12. Zhang QJ, Wang WH, Wei XP, Yu YG. Safety and efficacy of frameless stereotactic brain biopsy techniques.Chin Med Sci J. 2013;28:113-6.
  13. Kulkarni AV, Guha A, Lozano A, Bernstein M: Inci