Journals / İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

FAST HUGS WITH ICU Efficacy in Intensive Care Patients

Yoğun Bakım Hastalarında FAST HUGS WITH ICU Etkinliği

Pages
52–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that sufficient calorie intake could not be provided, there were treatment deficiencies in sedation, analgesia and thromboprophylaxis applications, daily research and treatment plans of 11 patients were not recorded, and daily medical treatments of 16 patients were not reviewed, CAM-ICU scoring was not performed for any of the patients, and there were also deficiencies in follow ups as well as applications for all other parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In order to regularly follow all of the vital parameters without overlooking any of them during the follow-up of patients in the intensive care units, acronyms formed by combining the initial letters were utilized.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: This study was performed during the random daily follow up of 29 level 3 and 24 level 2 intensive care patients that were followed up outside the Anesthesia Intensive Care Units of University of Health Sciences İzmir Tepecik Research and Training Hospital and SuatSeren Research and Training Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that sufficient calorie intake could not be provided, there were treatment deficiencies in sedation, analgesia and thromboprophylaxis applications, daily research and treatment plans of 11 patients were not recorded, and daily medical treatments of 16 patients were not reviewed, CAM-ICU scoring was not performed for any of the patients, and there were also deficiencies in follow ups as well as applications for all other parameters.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In order to regularly follow all of the vital parameters without overlooking any of them during the follow-up of patients in the intensive care units, acronyms formed by combining the initial letters were utilized. Our aim is to evaluate the control parameters, and by using “FAST HUGS WITH ICU”, to assess the potential deficiencies that can be identified as a whole during daily follow-ups. Method: This study was performed during the random daily follow up of 29 level 3 and 24 level 2 intensive care patients that were followed up outside the Anesthesia Intensive Care Units of University of Health Sciences İzmir Tepecik Research and Training Hospital and SuatSeren Research and Training Hospital. Each control parameter was evaluated together with the responsible doctor and the detected implementation deficiencies were recorded. Results: The mean age of the participating patients was 65.53±14.71 years, and their median weight was 75 kg. It was found that sufficient calorie intake could not be provided, there were treatment deficiencies in sedation, analgesia and thromboprophylaxis applications, daily research and treatment plans of 11 patients were not recorded, and daily medical treatments of 16 patients were not reviewed, CAM-ICU scoring was not performed for any of the patients, and there were also deficiencies in follow ups as well as applications for all other parameters. It was found that hourly urinalysis during monitorization was not performed for 12 patients with Foley catheter, NG was applied to 4 patients for longer than 4 weeks and not replaced with PEG. It was noted that there were defiencies in followup of infection markers Conclusion: Concordant with the literature,we found that significant deficiencies can occur in daily follow-up of patients. This mnemonic is a parameter where 15 parameters are simultaneously evaluated, and providing very fast and collective review in the hands of experienced users.

Özet

Amaç: Yoğun bakım ünitelerinde hastaların takipleri sırasında tüm yaşamsal parametrelerin atlanmadan düzenle takip edilmesi için baş harflerin birleştirilmesi ile oluşturulan kısaltmalar kullanılmıştır. Amacımız kontrol parametrelerini gözden geçirerek “FAST HUGS WITH ICU” ile günlük takiplerde saptanabilecek olası eksikliklerin topluca değerlendirilmesidir. Yöntem: Bu çalışma, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi İzmir Tepecik EAH ve Suat Seren EAH’lerinde Anestezi Yoğun Bakım Ünitesi dışında takip edilen; 29’u üçüncü düzey ve 24’ü ikinci düzey yoğun bakım hastasının rastgele bir günlük takibi sırasında uygulanmıştır. Her bir kontrol parametresi takip eden hekim ile birlikte değerlendirilmiş ve belirlenen uygulama eksiklikleri kaydedilmiştir. Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 65,53±14,71, ağırlık ortancası 75 kg (65-80)’di. Çalışmamızda özellikle yeterli kalori alımının sağlanamadığı, sedasyon, analjezi ve tromboproflaksi uygulamalarında tedavi eksiklikleri olduğu, 11 hastada günlük araştırmaların ve tedavi planlamasının kaydedilmediği, 16 hastada günlük medikal tedavilerin gözden geçirilmediği, hastaların hiçbirinde CAM-ICU skorlamasının yapılmadığı ve diğer tüm parametreler için de takiplerde ve uygulamalarda eksiklikler olduğu saptanmıştır. On iki foley sondalı hastada saatlik idrar takibi yapılmadığı, 4 hastada 4 haftadan uzun süredir NG uygulandığı ve PEG’e geçilmediği saptanmıştır. Hastaların enfeksiyon markırlarının takibinde eksikler olduğu kaydedilmiştir. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda, literatür ile uyumlu olarak günlük hasta takibinde önemli eksikliklerin yapılabileceğini gördük. Bu nimonik 15 parametrenin aynı anda değerlendirildiği ve deneyimli kullanıcıların elinde çok hızlı ve kolektif bir gözden geçirme sağlayan bir parametredir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZİNCİROĞLU, Ç., YAMAN, G., KÖSE, I., ALBAYRAK, M. Z., UZUN, U., SARITAŞ, A., ŞENOĞLU, N. (2020). FAST HUGS WITH ICU Efficacy in Intensive Care Patients. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 52–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/268478

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Vincent JL. Give your patient a fast hug (at least) once a day. Critical Care Medicine. 2005;33(6):1225-9. [CrossRef] 2. Vincent WR, 3rd, Hatton KW. Critically ill patients need “FAST HUGS BID” (an updated mnemonic). Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2326-7. [CrossRef] 3. Chikungwa M. Extend “FAST HUG” with “FAITH”. Letters to the editor. JICS. 2010;11(1):69-70. [CrossRef] 4. Cullen DJ, Sweitzer BJ, Bates DW, Burdick E, Edmondson A, Leape LL. Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patient: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1289-97. [CrossRef] 5. Şenoğlu N, Köse I, Zincircioğlu Ç, Erbay RH. Yoğun bakımla hızlıkucaklaşma (Fast Hugs). Türk yoğun bakım derneği dergisi. 2014;12:72-81. [CrossRef] 6. JM Binnekade, R Tepaske, P Bruynzeel, EMH Mathus-Vliegen and RJ de Hann. Daily enteral feeding practice on the ICU: attainment of goals and interfering factors Crit Care. 2005 Jun;9(3):218-25. [CrossRef] 7. Monares Zepeda E, Galindo Martín CA. Giving a nutritional fast hug in the intensive care unit. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31(5):2212-9. 8. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the Intensive Care Unit: executive summary. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(1):53-8. [CrossRef] 9. Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(1):119-41. [CrossRef] 10. García-Olivares P, Guerrero JE, Tomey MJ, Hernangómez AM, Stanescu DO. Prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in the critical patient: anassessment of clinical practice in the Community of Madrid. Med Intensiva. 2014;38(6):347-55. [CrossRef] 11. Drakulovic MB, Torres A, Bauer TT, et al: Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: A randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:1851-8. [CrossRef] 12. Ibanez J, Penafiel A, Raurich JM, Marse P, Jorda R, Mata F. Gastroesophageal reflux in intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition: effect of supine and semirecumbent positions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992;16:419-22. [CrossRef] 13. Orozco-Levi M, Torres A, Ferrer M, et al. Semirecumbent position protects from pulmonary aspiration but not completely from gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:1387-90. [Cros