Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Functional and Radiological Outcomes of the Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with Proximal Anatomic Locking Plate

Proksimal Humerus Kırıklarında Proksimal Anatomik Kilitli Plak ile Tespitin Fonksiyonel ve Radyolojik Sonuçları

Pages
140–146
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Treathment with proximal anatomic locking plate is preferred since it supports early motion and leads to good functional results in partial proximal humeral fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to evaluate functional and radiographic outcomes of patients with proximal humeral fractures treated with proximal anatomic locking plate and were classified according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this study we included 29 patients (13 females, 16 males) aged 16-82 years who were treated with proximal anatomic locking plate between February 2010 and July 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Treathment with proximal anatomic locking plate is preferred since it supports early motion and leads to good functional results in partial proximal humeral fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to evaluate functional and radiographic outcomes of patients with proximal humeral fractures treated with proximal anatomic locking plate and were classified according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification. Methods: In this study we included 29 patients (13 females, 16 males) aged 16-82 years who were treated with proximal anatomic locking plate between February 2010 and July 2014. The mean follow up time was 17.76±8.31 months. The right shoulder was operated in 20 patients and the left shoulder in nine patients. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score and radiologic outcomes were assessed using anteroposterior radyograph. Results: At the final follow up, the mean Constant-Murley score was 75.48±18.69. The result was poor in 31.0% (n=9), moderate in 24.1% (n=7), 13.8% (n=4) good and excellent in 31.0% (n=9) of patients. The mean UCLA score was 30.10±5.73. The outcome was poor in 17.2% (n=5), good in 31.0% (n=9) and excellent in 51.7% (n=15) of patients. In 21 patients there were no complications, but complications occurred in eight. When we compared the patients per age groups ( 65), there was no difference in collo-diaphyseal angle (p=0,097, p>0,05), but the ConstantMurley scores (p=0,001) and UCLA scores (p=0,01) were statistically higher in patients below 65 years of age than in those above 65 years. Conclusion: Treathment with proximal anatomic locking plate is preferred since it supports early motion and leads to good functional results in partial proximal humeral fractures.

Özet

Amaç: Osteosentez Sorunları Çalışma Grubu/Ortopedik Travma Derneği (AO/OTA) sınıflamasına göre sınıflandırılmış ve proksimal kilitli anatomik plak ile tedavi edilmiş hastaların ameliyat sonrası fonksiyonel ve radyolojik sonuçlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya Şubat 2010-Temmuz 2014 tarihlerinde humerus üst uç kırığı nedeniyle proksimal anatomik plak uygulanan 29 (kadın=13, erkek=16; yaş: 16-82, ortalama: 49,38±18,76) hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Takip süreleri ortalama 17,76±8,31 ay olan hastaların 20’si sağ omuzdan, dokuzu sol omuzdan ameliyat edildi. Fonksiyonel sonuçlar Constant-Murley ve Los Angeles, Kaliforniya Üniversitesi (UCLA) omuz skoru kullanılarak, radyolojik sonuçlar tam anteroposterior grafi ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Takip süresi sonunda ortalama Constant-Murley skoru 75,48±18,69 bulundu. Hastalarda %31,0 (n=9) kötü, %24,1 (n=7) zayıf, %13,8 (n=4) iyi ve %31,0 (n=9) mükemmel sonuç elde edildi. Ortalama UCLA skoru 30,10±5,73 iken hastalarda %17,2 (n=5) kötü, %31,0 (n=9) iyi ve %51,7 (n=15) mükemmel sonuç elde edildi. Ameliyatlı tarafın kollodiafizer açıları ortalama 125,83±12,74 iken; sağlam tarafın ortalama açısı 133,50±2,93’tür. Hastaların 21’inde komplikasyon saptanmazken, sekizinde komplikasyon gelişti. Altmış beş yaş altı hastalarda 65 yaş üstü hastalara göre kollodiafizer açıda farklılık saptanmazken (p=0,097, p>0,05), Constant-Murley (p=0,001) ve UCLA (p=0,01) omuz skorlarında anlamlı değişiklikler saptandı. Sonuç: Parçalı proksimal humerus kırıklarında uygulanan proksimal kilitli anatomik plakların erken harekete izin verebilecek stabiliteyi sağlaması, tercih nedeni olmakta ve fonksiyonel sonuçların iyileşmesini sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAK, A., KURAL, C., DURAMAZ, A., BAYRAK, S. K., KIZILKAYA, C., AVKAN, M. C. (2018). Functional and Radiological Outcomes of the Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with Proximal Anatomic Locking Plate. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 140–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/267801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Vijayvargia M, Pathak A, Gaur S. Outcome analysis of Locking Plate Fixation in Proximal Humerus Fracture. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:RC01-5. Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi L, Tejwani N, Zuckerman JD. Early Complications in Proximal Humerus Fractures (OTA Types 11) Treated With Locked Plates. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:159-64.
  2. Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989;108:285-7.
  3. Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK. Open reduktion and internal fiksation of the three and four part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1919-25.
  4. Iannotti JP, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Warner JJP. Nonprosthetic management of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:1578-93.
  5. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Jarvinen M, Vuori I. Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly Finnish persons: sharp increase in 1970-1998 and alarming projections for the new millennium. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:465-70.
  6. Rees J, Hicks J, Ribbans W. Assesment and management of three and four part proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;353:18-29.
  7. Rajesekhar C, Ray PS, Bhamra MS. Fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the polarus nail. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10:7-10.
  8. Helfen T, Siebenburger G, Mayer M, Bocker W, Ockert B, Haasters F. Operative treathment of 2-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus (AO 11-A3) in the elderly: Cement augmented locking plate PHILOSTM vs. proximal humerus nail MultiLoc®. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2016;17:1-7.
  9. Burke NG, Kennedy J, Cousins G, Fitzpatrick D, Mullet H. Locking plate fixation with and without inferomedial screws for proximal humeral fractures: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Surg 2014;22:190-4.
  10. Neer CS, Four-segment classification of proksimal humeral fractures: Purpose and reliable use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11(4):389-400.
  11. Neer CS, Shoulder reconstruction. Philedelphia WB Saunders, 1990.
  12. Zyato K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Törnkvist H. Treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:412-7.
  13. Kayalar M, Toros T, Bal E, Özaksar K, Gürbüz Y, Ademoğlu Y. Proksimal humerus kırıklarında perkütan tespit için hasta seçiminin önemi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2007;43:35-41.
  14. Agudelo JF, Shürmann M, Stahel P, et al. Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures threated with angular stable locking plates. J Orthop Traum