Journals / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Acute correction and intramedullary nailing of aseptic oligotrophic and atrophic tibial nonunions with deformity

Pages
480–487
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The infection risk should always be kept in mind and patients should be followed-up closely to prevent complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to describe the important points for treatment of aseptic tibial oligotrophic and atrophic nonunions by intramedullary nailing (IMN).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: The retrospective study included 17 biologically nonactive nonunion patients (12 males, 5 females; mean age 36.4 years; range, 19 to 49 years) operated between February 2010 and November 2017 by deformity correction, static IMN and autografting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The infection risk should always be kept in mind and patients should be followed-up closely to prevent complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to describe the important points for treatment of aseptic tibial oligotrophic and atrophic nonunions by intramedullary nailing (IMN). Patients and methods: The retrospective study included 17 biologically nonactive nonunion patients (12 males, 5 females; mean age 36.4 years; range, 19 to 49 years) operated between February 2010 and November 2017 by deformity correction, static IMN and autografting. The mean follow-up time was 4.2 (range, 3 to 7) years. The initial fracture management was external fixator for all patients. Fourteen patients had open fractures initially. Six patients had valgus, four patients had varus, three patients had oblique plane, and four patients had external rotational deformity. Nonunion diagnosis was established on the basis of the patient history and physical examination based on plain radiographs, computed tomography or both. All patients were evaluated by the same protocol to exclude any infection. Results: The median time from injury to nailing was mean 10.3 (range, 6.1 to 36.5) months. Radiologic and clinical union was achieved in all patients. The mean union time was 3.64 (range, 3 to 6) months. Three patients had positive intraoperative bacteriological culture. In four patients, dynamization was necessary for consolidation. Late deep infection developed in three patients after union, and all infected cases were operated by implant removal, debridement, and appropriate antibiotics. Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing and autografting after external fixator provide good results for the treatment of aseptic biologically nonactive nonunions with deformity. Reamed IMN ensures sufficient deformity correction, biological environment, and mechanical stability. The infection risk should always be kept in mind and patients should be followed-up closely to prevent complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURAL, C., DURAMAZ, A., BAYRAK, A., EDİPOĞLU, E., TANRIVERDİ, B., BİLGİLİ, M. G., HÜRMEYDAN, Ö. M. (2022). Acute correction and intramedullary nailing of aseptic oligotrophic and atrophic tibial nonunions with deformity. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 480–487. https://ajindex.com/articles/559349

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Boyd HB, Lipinski SW, Willey JH. Observations on nonunion of the shafts of long bones with a statistical analysis of 842 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 1961;43A:159
  2. Ellis H. The speed of healing after fracture of the tibial shaft. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1958;40:42-6
  3. Heppenstall RB, Brighton CT, Esterhai JL Jr, Muller G. Prognostic factors in nonunion of the tibia: an evaluation of 185 cases treated with constant direct current. J Trauma 1984;24:790-5
  4. Çiçekli Ö, Kochai A, Şükür E, Başak AM, Kurtoğlu A, Türker M. Suprapatellar approach for fractures of the tibia: Does the fracture level matter? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2019;30:10-6
  5. Lambiris E, Tyllianakis M, Megas P, Panagiotopoulos E. Intramedullary nailing: experience in 427 patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1996;55:25-7
  6. Lottes JO. Treatment of delayed or nonunion fractures of the tibia by a medullary nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1965;43:111-28
  7. Megas P, Panagiotopoulos E, Skriviliotakis S, Lambiris E. Intramedullary nailing in the treatment of aseptic tibial nonunion. Injury 2001;32:233-9
  8. Gustilo RB, Merkow RL, Templeman D. The management of open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72:299-304
  9. Swanson EA, Garrard EC, OʼConnor DP, Brinker MR. Results of a systematic approach to exchange nailing for the treatment of aseptic tibial nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:28-35
  10. Weber B, editor. Pseudarthrosis: Pathophysiology, biomechanics, therapy, resuls. Bern Switzerland: Hans Huber; 1976
  11. Leow JM, Clement ND, Tawonsawatruk T, Simpson CJ, Simpson AH. The radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures: Reliability of the outcome measure at an independent centre. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:116-21
  12. Phieffer LS, Goulet JA. Delayed unions of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88:206-16
  13. Goulet JA, Templeman D. Delayed union and nonunion of tibial shaft fractures. Instr Course Lect 1997;46:281-91
  14. Bhattacharyya T, Bouchard KA, Phadke A, Meigs JB, Kassarjian A, Salamipour H. The accuracy of computed tomography for the diagnosis of tibial nonunion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88:692-7
  15. Hak DJ. Management of aseptic tibial nonunion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19:563-73
  16. Amorosa LF, Buirs LD, Bexkens R, Wellman DS, Kloen P, Lorich DG, et al. A single-stage treatment protocol for presumptive aseptic diaphyseal nonunions: a review of outcomes. J Orthop Trauma 2013;27:582-6
  17. Kostic I, Mitkovic M, Mitkovic M. The diaphyseal aseptic tibial nonunions after failed pr