Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8

Partial load-bearing rabbit ulnar segmental defects are regenerated with biocompatible grafts with or without bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Pages
1066–1072
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: The results of our study demonstrated that in rabbit ulnar segmental bone defect model was obtained satisfactory regeneration with using biocomposite graft with or without BM-MSC

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The autologous bone grafts still have been used as the gold standard to initiate and facilitate bone healing in cases with bone defects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: In our study, a 10 mm osteoperiosteal segmental bone defect was created in the middle of the right and left ulnar bones of eight rabbits.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: The results of our study demonstrated that in rabbit ulnar segmental bone defect model was obtained satisfactory regeneration with using biocomposite graft with or without BM-MSC
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The autologous bone grafts still have been used as the gold standard to initiate and facilitate bone healing in cases with bone defects. Because of some disadvantages of autologous bone grafts, the new biocomposite grafts have been researched. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) loaded into a biocomposite scaffold enhance bone regeneration. METHODS: In our study, a 10 mm osteoperiosteal segmental bone defect was created in the middle of the right and left ulnar bones of eight rabbits. The created defects were filled in the right ulnar bones of eight rabbits (Group I) with BM-MSCs loaded onto a bio- composite scaffold (Plexur PTM, Osteotech, Eatontown, NJ, USA) and in the other ulnar bones of the same rabbits (Group II) with only biocomposite graft. Radiographs of each forelimb were taken postoperatively at the end of the 6th week. Then, the rabbits were euthanized pharmacologically for histopathological evaluation. RESULTS: Were scored using a modified Lane and Sandhu scoring system. All defects healed in both groups. Radiological and histo- logical total scores were slightly better in Group I, but statistical tests did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups at the end of the 6th week radiologically and histologically (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of our study demonstrated that in rabbit ulnar segmental bone defect model was obtained satisfactory regeneration with using biocomposite graft with or without BM-MSC

🔖

Cite This Article

Basaran, S. H., Bayrak, A., Tanrıverdi, G., Tanriverdi, B., Avkan, M. C. (2022). Partial load-bearing rabbit ulnar segmental defects are regenerated with biocompatible grafts with or without bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8, 1066–1072. https://ajindex.com/articles/644014

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sen MK, Miclau T. Autologous iliac crest bone graft: Should it still be the gold standard for treating nonunions? Injury 2007;38:S75−80
  2. Younger EM, Chapman MW. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Or- thop Trauma 1989;3:192−5
  3. Enneking WF, Eady JL, Burchardt H. Autogenous cortical bone grafts in the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:1039−58
  4. Ruhé PQ, Hedberg-Dirk EL, Padron NT, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA, Mikos AG. Porous poly (DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid)/calcium phos- phate cement composite for reconstruction of bone defects. Tissue Eng 2006;12:789−800
  5. Wang J, Yu X. Preparation, characterization and in vitro analysis of novel structured nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Bioma- ter 2010;6:3004−12
  6. Panetta NJ, Gupta DM, Quarto N, Longaker MT. Mesenchymal cells for skeletal tissue engineering. Panminerva Med 2009;51:25−41
  7. Waese EY, Kandel RA, Stanford WL. Application of stem cells in bone repair. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37:601−8
  8. Jones E, Yang X. Mesenchymal stem cells and bone regeneration: Current status. Injury 2011;42:562−8
  9. Laurencin CT, Khan Y, Kofron M, El-Amin S, Botchwey E, Yu X, et al. The ABJS Nicolas Andry award: Tissue engineering of bone and liga- ment: A 15-year perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;447:221−36
  10. Bruder SP, Kurth AA, Shea M, Hayes WC, Jaiswal N, Kadiyala S. Bone regeneration by implantation of purified, culture-expanded human mes- enchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 1998;16:155−62
  11. Kim H, Suh H, Jo SA, Kim HW, Lee JM, Kim EH et al. In vivo bone formation by human marrow stromal cells in biodegradable scaffolds that release dexamethasone and ascorbate-2-phosphate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;332:1053−60
  12. Hao W, Dong J, Jiang M, Wu J, Cui F, Zhou D. Enhanced bone formation in large segmental radial defects by combining adipose-derived stem cells expressing bone morphogenetic protein 2 with nHA/RHLC/PLA scaf- fold. Int Orthop 2010;34:1341−9
  13. Wan C, He Q, Li G. Allogenic peripheral blood derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) enhance bone regeneration in rabbit ulna critical-sized bone defect model. J Orthop Res 2006;24:610−8
  14. Keskin DS, Tezcaner A, Korkusuz P, Korkusuz F, Hasirci V. Colla- gen-chondroitin sulfate-based PLLA-SAIB-coated rhBMP-2 delivery system for bone repair. Biomaterials 2005;26:4023−34
  15. Chen SH, Lei M, Xie XH, Zheng LZ, Yao D, Wang XL, et al. PLGA/ TCP composite scaffold incorporating bioactive phytom