Journals / Harita Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 73 - Sayı: 18

Local geoid surface approximation by fuzzy inference systems: Case studies in Turkey

Pages
49–54
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For these two regions, geoid heights have been determined through fuzzy logic approach and the obtained results are interpreted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As one of the actual topics in the field of geodesy, geoid determination has never lost its priority.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Being parallel to the developments in space-based techniques, enormous advances in computer technology have enabled geodesists to easily apply some analysis and algorithms that had seemed to be much more complicated till 1980s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For these two regions, geoid heights have been determined through fuzzy logic approach and the obtained results are interpreted.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As one of the actual topics in the field of geodesy, geoid determination has never lost its priority. Wide-use of advanced space techniques in geodetic applications has even made geoid determination a more important research field. For example, ellipsoidal heights used for geoid height determination can be obtained much more precisely and reliably with space-based positioning techniques. Being parallel to the developments in space-based techniques, enormous advances in computer technology have enabled geodesists to easily apply some analysis and algorithms that had seemed to be much more complicated till 1980s. Through these developments new analysis techniques have also been developed. Fuzzy logic method that is widely employed in particular in case of low precision, uncertainty and the lack of information is one of these methods. In recent years, fuzzy logic algorithms have been widely applied in such geodetic studies as deformation analysis, ambiguity resolution in GPS, remote sensing, prediction of earth orientation parameters, GIS applications, immovable property valuation and etc. In this study, application of fuzzy logic approach in geoid surface approximation is discussed. The data belong to two different regions located in Istanbul and Sakarya, a town about 150 km east of Istanbul. The topographic structures of these regions have different characteristics. For these two regions, geoid heights have been determined through fuzzy logic approach and the obtained results are interpreted.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, M., ÖZLÜDEMİR, M. T., ÇELİK, R. N., AYAN, T. (2007). Local geoid surface approximation by fuzzy inference systems: Case studies in Turkey. Harita Dergisi, Cilt: 73 - Sayı: 18, 49–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/267700

References (11)

  1. Akyılmaz, O., T. Ayan and M.T. Özlüdemir (2003). Geoid Surface Approximation by Using Adaptive Network Based Fuzzy Inference Systems. Allgemeine Vermessungs-Nachrichten, 8-9, pp. 308-315.
  2. Akyılmaz, O. (2005). Applications of Soft Computing Methods in Geodesy. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey (in Turkish). Ayan, T., A. Aksoy, R. Deniz, E. Arslan, R.N. Çelik, C. Özşamh, H.H. Denli, S. Erol and B. Özöner (1999). Istanbul GPS network (IGNA). Technical Report, ITU Civil Engineering Faculty, Division of Geodesy, Istanbul (in Turkish). Ayan, T., R. Deniz, R.N. Çelik, H.H. Denli, M.T. Özlüdemir.S. Erol, B. Özöner, O. Akyılmaz, and C. Güney, (2001). İzmir Geodetic Reference System-2001, (IzJRS-2001).
  3. Technical Report, ITU Civil Engineering Faculty, Division of Geodesy, Istanbul (in Turkish). Engelis, T., R.H. Rapp and Y. Bock (1985). Measuring Orthometric Height Differences with GPS and Gravity Data. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 10 (3), pp. 187-194.
  4. Erol, B. and R.N. Çelik (2005). Precise Local Geoid Models in Engineering Measurements and Their Practical Applications in Turkey. In: Proc. of 2th symposium on Engineering Measurements, Istanbul, Turkey, November 23-25.
  5. Featherstone, W.E. (2001). Absolute and Relative Testing of Gravimetric Geoid Models Using Global Positioning System and Orthometric Height Data. Computers&Geosciences, 27, pp. 807-814.
  6. Jang, J.-S.R. (1991). Fuzzy Modelling Using Generalized Neural Networks and Kalman Filter Algorithm. In: Proc. of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-91), Anaheim, California, USA, July 15-19, pp. 762-767.
  7. Jang, J.-S.R. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive Network Based Fuzzy Inference System. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23 (3), pp. 665-685.
  8. Jang, J.-S.R. (1995). Neuro-Fuzzy Modelling and Control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 83 (3), pp. 378-406.
  9. Kotsakis, C. and M.G. Sideris (1999). On the Adjustment of Combined GPS/Levelling/Geoid Networks. Journal of Geodesy, 73, pp. 412-421.
  10. Kuhar, M., B. Stopar, G. Turk and T. Ambrozic (2001). The Use of Artificial Neural Network in Geoid Surface Approximation. Allgemeine Vermessungs-Nachrichten, 1, pp. 22-27. Mârtensson, S.G. (2002). Height Determination by GPS-Accuracy with Respect to Different Geoid Models in Sweden. In: Proc of FIG XXII International Congress, Washington D.C., USA, April 19-26.
  11. Takagi, T. and M. Sugeno (1983). Derivation of Fuzzy Control Rules from Human Operator's Control Actio