Journals / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2013 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Conservative restorations of endodontically-treated teeth

Endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlerin konservatif restorasyonları

Pages
44–8
Publication Date
2013-03-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, the effect of these techniques on the prevention of the fractures of endodontically-treated teeth is discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The choice of restorative material and restoration technique to be used in the restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth is important to increase their stability against fracture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Composite resin is more preferred to amalgam for the restoration of such teeth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, the effect of these techniques on the prevention of the fractures of endodontically-treated teeth is discussed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Endodontik Olarak Tedavi Görmüş Dişler · Fiber Ağ · Fiber Post

Abstract

The choice of restorative material and restoration technique to be used in the restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth is important to increase their stability against fracture. Composite resin is more preferred to amalgam for the restoration of such teeth. The use of composite resin with the modern adhesive systems is known to strengthen the remaining tooth structures. Furthermore, in order to strengthen the endodontically-treated tooth against fracture, restorative techniques such as placement of a post in the root canal, use of onlay restorations covering the tubercles, incorporating woven-fiber into composite material or combinations may be used. In this review, the effect of these techniques on the prevention of the fractures of endodontically-treated teeth is discussed.

Özet

Aşırı madde kaybı olan endodontik tedavi görmüş arka grup dişlerin restorasyonunda kullanılacak restoratif materyalin ve restorasyon tekniğinin seçimi bu dişlerin kırılmaya karşı dayanıklılıklarını arttırmak için oldukça önemlidir. Kompozit rezin, bu tip dişlerin restorasyonunda amalgamdan daha fazla tercih edilen bir materyaldir. Kompozit rezinin günümüzde oldukça gelişmiş olan adeziv sistemlerle birlikte kullanımının diş dokusunu güçlendirici etkisinin bulunduğu bilinen bir gerçektir. Bunun yanı sıra endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlerin kırılmaya karşı dayanımlarını arttırmak amacıyla kök kanalına post yerleştirilmesi, tüberküllerin kaplanmasına olanak sağlayan onley restorasyonların uygulanması, kompozit materyali içerisine fiber ağ yerleştirilmesi veya bunların birlikte kullanımı gibi değişik restorasyon teknikleri kullanılabilir. Bu derlemede bu tekniklerin endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlerin kırılmaya karşı etkileri tartışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YIKILGAN, İ., BALA, O. (2013). Conservative restorations of endodontically-treated teeth. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 44–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/265502

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine RJ, et al. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2011;37:895-902.
  2. Kirkevang LL, Orstavik D, Horsted-Bindslev P, Wenzel A. Periapical status and quality of root fillings and coronal restorations in a Danish population. Int Endod J 2000;33:509-15.
  3. Tronstad L, Asbjornsen K, Doving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen HM. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16:218-21.
  4. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 2007.
  5. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:565-7.
  6. Gonzalez-Lopez S, De Haro-Gasquet F, Vilchez-Diaz MA, Ceballos L, Bravo M. Effect of restorative procedures and occlusal loading on cuspal deflection. Oper Dent 2006; 31:33-8.
  7. Oskoee PA, Ajami AA, Navimipour EJ, Oskoee SS, Sadjadi J. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth. J Endod 2009;35:413-6.
  8. Tikku AP, Chandra A, Bharti R. Are full cast crowns mandatory after endodontic treatment in posterior teeth? J Conserv Dent. 2010;13:246-8.
  9. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Edward J, Swift JE. Sturdevant's Art & Science of Operative Dentistry, 5th edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 2010.
  10. Faria AC, Rodrigues RC, de Almeida Antunes RP, de Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF. Endodontically treated teeth: characteristics and considerations to restore them. J Prosthodont Res 2011;55:69-74.
  11. Ekstrand J, Nielsen JB, Havarinasab S, Zalups RK, Söderkvist P, Hultman P. Mercury toxicokinetics--dependency on strain and gender. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;15:283-91.
  12. Monga P, Sharma V, Kumar S. Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronalrestorative materials: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2009;12:154-9.
  13. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Gomide HA, Araujo CA, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:114-22. Hansen EK. In vivo cusp fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with MOD amalgam or MOD resin fillings. Dent Mater 1988;4:169-73.
  14. ElAyouti A, Serry MI, Geis-Gerstorfe