Journals / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

Clinical evaluation and classification of patients with temporomandibular disorders using ‘Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders’

Temporomandibular düzensizlik tanı kriterlerini kullanarak temporomandibular bozukluğu olan hastaların klinik değerlendirilmesi ve sınıflandırılması

Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2020-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In DC/TMD Axis II, JFLS-8 is an efficient instrument for the measurement of functional limitation associated with temporomandibular disorders.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of subgroups in a clinical setting of the patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) using ‘Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD)’.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: A total of 128 patients with TMD (92 females and 36 males, mean age 33.5 ± 8.28) were involved in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In DC/TMD Axis II, JFLS-8 is an efficient instrument for the measurement of functional limitation associated with temporomandibular disorders.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Temporomandibular eklem bozuklukları · temporomandibular eklem disfonksiyon sendromu · temporomandibular eklem disk

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of subgroups in a clinical setting of the patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) using ‘Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD)’. Materials and Method: A total of 128 patients with TMD (92 females and 36 males, mean age 33.5 ± 8.28) were involved in the study. DC/TMD Axis I diagnosis criteria was used for the clinical examination of pain disorders and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. Also, in DC/TMD Axis I, The TMD Pain Screener, focusing on pain within the last 30 days, was used. In DC/TMD Axis II evaluation, the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-8 (JFLS-8) was preferred to detect symptom severity and functional limitations. The data analysis was conducted by using the Chi-square, Kruskal Wallis test, and the Bonferroni correction for the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Out of 128 patients, 120 patients (93.75%) had TMJ disorders that were accompanied by muscle pain disorders. The effect of gender and age on TMJ/muscle pain disorders was not significant (TMJ disorders; p=0.123, p=0.263; Muscle pain disorders; p=0.145, p=0.100, respectively). According to JFLS-8, the limitation in mastication (item 1 and 2) and joint mobility (item 4) were major complaints in the group of patients with ‘disc displacement without reduction with limited opening’ compared to the other TMJ disorders (p=0.001, p=0.004, p=0.007, p<0.008). Conclusion: DC/TMD Axis I is a significant reference to clinicians in the diagnosis and evaluation of TMD. In DC/TMD Axis II, JFLS-8 is an efficient instrument for the measurement of functional limitation associated with temporomandibular disorders.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ‘temporomandibular düzensizlikler için teşhis kriterlerini (DC-TMD)’ kullanarak, temporomandibular düzensizlik şikâyeti olan hastalarda klinikte alt grupların dağılım sıklığını değerlendirmektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya, temporomandibular düzensizlik (TMD) şikâyeti olan 128 hasta (92 kadın ve 36 erkek, yaş ortalaması 33.5 ± 8.28) dahil edildi. DC/TMD Eksen I tanı kriterleri ile ağrı bozuklukları ve temporomandibular eklem (TME) düzensizliklerinin dağılımı incelendi. DC/TMD Eksen I’de yer alan TMD Ağrı anketi (TMD Pain Screener) ile de son 30 gün boyunca mevcut ağrının incelemesi yapılmıştır. Semptomların şiddetini ve fonksiyon kısıtlılığını belirlemek için DC/TMD Eksen II değerlendirme araçlarından biri olan ‘Çene Fonksiyon Kısıtlanma Skalası-8 (JFLS-8)’tercih edilmiştir. Verilerin analizi Ki-kare, Kruskal Wallis testi ve Bonferroni düzeltmeli Mann-Whitney U testi kullanılarak yapılmıştır.Bulgular: Çalışmada 128 hastanın 120’sinde (%93.75) kas ağrı bozukluğuna eşlik eden TME düzensizliği vardı. Cinsiyet ve yaşın, TME/kas ağrı bozuklukları üzerine etkisi anlamlı değildir (sırasıyla, TME düzensizliği p=0.123, p=0.263; kas ağrı bozukluğu p=0.145, p=0.100). JFLS-8’e göre, diğer gruplarla karşılaştırıldığında ‘kısıtlı ağız açıklığı olan redüksiyonsuz disk deplasmanı’ grubunda, çiğnemede zorluk (1 ve 2. maddeler) ve eklem hareketinde kısıtlılık (4. madde) majör şikayetler olarak bulunmuştur (p=0.001, p=0.004, p=0.007, p<0.008). Sonuç: DC/TMD Eksen I, TMD tanısı ve değerlendirilmesinde klinisyenler için önemli bir referans olup, DC/TMD Eksen II’de JFLS-8, TMD’ye bağlı çene fonksiyon kısıtlılığın tespitinde etkin bir değerlendirme aracıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alpaslan, C., YAMAN, D. (2020). Clinical evaluation and classification of patients with temporomandibular disorders using ‘Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders’. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/265314

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Svensson P. Muscle pain in the head: overlap between temporomandibular disorders and tension-type headaches. Curr Opin Neurol 2007;20:320-5.
  2. Conti PC, Costa YM, Gonçalves DA, Svensson P. Headaches and myofascial temporomandibular disorders: overlapping entities, separate managements? J Oral Rehabil 2016;43:702-15.
  3. Tuz HH, Onder EM, Kisnisci RS. Prevalence of otologic complaints in patients with temporomandibular disorder. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:620-3. Goldstein BH. Temporomandibular disorders: a review of current understanding. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:379-85.
  4. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove EL, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6-27.
  5. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R. Executive summary of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for clinical and research applications. J Am Dent Assoc 2016;147:438-45.
  6. Gonzalez YM, Schiffman E, Gordon SM, Seago B, Truelove EL, Slade G, et al. Development of a brief and effective temporomandibular disorder pain screening questionnaire: reliability and validity. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:1183-91.
  7. Ohrbach R, Granger C, List T, Dworkin S. Preliminary development and validation of the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36:228-36.
  8. Ohrbach R, Larsson P, List T. The Jaw Functional Limitation Scale: development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions. J Orofac Pain 2008;22:219-30.
  9. Lövgren A, Parvaneh H, Lobbezoo F, Häggman-Henrikson B, Wänman A, Visscher CM. Diagnostic accuracy of three screening questions (3Q/TMD) in relation to the DC/TMD in a specialized orofacial pain clinic. Acta Odontol Scand 2018;76:380-6.
  10. Manfredini D, Piccotti F, Ferronato G, Guarda-Nardini L. Age peaks of different RDC/TMD diagnoses in a patient population. ‎J Dent 2010;38:392-9.
  11. Winocur E, Steinkeller-Dekel M, Reiter S, Eli I. A retrospective analysis of temporomandibular findings among Israeli born patients based on the RDC/TMD. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:11-7.
  12. Manfredini D, Segù M, Bertacci A, Binotti G, Bosco M. Diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders according to RDC/TMD axis I findings, a multicenter Italian study. Minerva Stomatol 2004;53:429-38.
  13. Yap AU, Dworkin SF, Chua EK, List T, Tan KB, Prosthodont C, e