SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Computer and Education Research / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 14

A Qualitative Study on Patience in Academic Life

Akademik Hayatta Sabır Üzerine Nitel Bir Çalışma

Bilgen KIRAL
Pages
250–283
Publication Date
2019-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The researcher has reached the conclusion that PhD students can show patience to courses/academic studies, friends, academicians and physical environment; and showing patience creates psychological, physical and familial effects as well as effects on social life and effects related to friends.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was conducted to identify views of PhD students regarding the concept of patience in academia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was carried out with 8 PhD students studying at Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education in 2018-2019 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The researcher has reached the conclusion that PhD students can show patience to courses/academic studies, friends, academicians and physical environment; and showing patience creates psychological, physical and familial effects as well as effects on social life and effects related to friends.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sabır · akademi · akademik hayat

Abstract

This research was conducted to identify views of PhD students regarding the concept of patience in academia. The research was carried out with 8 PhD students studying at Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education in 2018-2019 academic year. Phenomenology, which is one of the qualitative research approach, was used in the study. The participants were selected on a volunteer basis with criterion sampling, convenience sampling and maximum variation sampling methods. The data was collected with semi-structured interview form created by the researcher and analyzed with content analysis method. Validity, reliability and ethics were considered in the study. The concept of patience was addressed within the categories of finding a solution and closing the case and education. The researcher has reached the conclusion that PhD students can show patience to courses/academic studies, friends, academicians and physical environment; and showing patience creates psychological, physical and familial effects as well as effects on social life and effects related to friends.

Özet

Araştırma doktora öğrencilerinin akademide sabır kavramına ilişkin görüşlerini tespit etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışma, 2018-2019 akademik yılında Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nde doktora öğrenimi gören 8 doktora öğrencisi ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada nitel araştırma desenlerinden fenomenoloji deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada katılımcılar ölçüt örneklem, kolay ulaşılabilir durum örneklemesi ve maksimum çeşitlilik örnekleme yöntemi ile gönüllülük esasına göre seçilmişlerdir. Araştırmada veriler, araştırmacı tarafından oluşturulan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ile toplanmış, veriler içerik analizi yöntem ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada geçerlik, güvenirlik, etik unsurlara dikkat edilmiştir. Araştırmada sabır kavramı çözüm yolu bulma ve olayı kapatma ile eğitim kategorileri içerisinde ele alınmıştır. Akademide dersler/akademik çalışmalar, arkadaşlar, hocalar ve fiziki ortama sabır gösterildiği; akademide sabır göstermenin doktora öğrencileri üzerinde psikolojik, bedensel, ailesel ve sosyal hayat/arkadaşlar ilişkileri üzerinde etkileri olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAL, B. (2019). A Qualitative Study on Patience in Academic Life. Journal of Computer and Education Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 14, 250–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/262721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akrivou, K., Bourantas, D., Mo, S. & Papalois, E. (2011). The sound of silence – a space for morality?: the role of solitude for ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(1), 119-133.
  2. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287.
  3. Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. New York: Rowman Altamira. Blount, S. (1995). When social outcomes aren’t fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131-144.
  4. Blount, S. & Janicik, G. A. (2001). When plans change: Examining how people evaluate timing changes in work organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(4). Burger, J. M. & Cooper, H. M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3(4), 381-393.
  5. Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4, 359-380.
  6. Comer, D. R. & Sekerka, L. E. (2014). Taking time for patience in organizations. Journal of Management Development, 33(1), 6-23.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. Creswell, J. W. & Clark, V. L. P. (2016). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. New York: Sage. Curry, O. S., Price, M. E. & Price, J. G. (2008). Patience is a virtue: Cooperative people have lower discount rates. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 780–785
  8. Darley, J. M. & Batson, C.D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100-108.
  9. Delongis, A., Coyne, J. C., Dakof, G., Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R.S. (1982). Relationship of daily hassles, uplifts, and major life events to health status. Health Psychology, 1, 119–136.
  10. DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Mead, N. L. & Vohs, K. D. (2011). How leaders self-regulate their task performance: evidence that power promotes diligence, depletion, and disdain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 47-65.
  11. Doğan, M. & Gülmez, Ç. (2014). Sabır ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Atatük Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 263-279.
  12. Doğan, M.