MELISSOPALNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF HONEY SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM ŞIRNAK CITY

As the second step of the microscopic analysis, the total pollen number of in 10 grams honey (TPN10) of the samples were calculated and it was observed that the values were vary between 1 177 and 82 005.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, 23 honey samples collected from South-Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey were investigated to identify their botanical sources.

📊

Key Findings & Data:According to the microscopic analysis results, pollen grains identified belong to the 24 taxa of 27 plant families.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:As the second step of the microscopic analysis, the total pollen number of in 10 grams honey (TPN10) of the samples were calculated and it was observed that the values were vary between 1 177 and 82 005.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Güneydoğu Anadolu · bal · melissopalinoloji

Abstract

In this study, 23 honey samples collected from South-Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey were investigated to identify their botanical sources. According to the microscopic analysis results, pollen grains identified belong to the 24 taxa of 27 plant families. As a result of melissopalynological analysis, 21 of the honey samples are characterized as multifloral and two of them are as unifloral (Myosotis honey). As the second step of the microscopic analysis, the total pollen number of in 10 grams honey (TPN10) of the samples were calculated and it was observed that the values were vary between 1 177 and 82 005.

Özet

Bu çalışma ile, Türkiye’nin Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nden 23 adet bal örneği toplanılmış ve bitkisel kökenleri tanımlanmak üzere araştırılmıştır. Mikroskobik analiz sonuçlarına göre, 27 bitki familyasına ait taksonların polenleri teşhis edilmiştir. Melissopalinolojik analizin bir sonucu olarak, 21 bal örneği karışık çiçek balı ve iki tanesi ise unifloral (Myosostis balı) olarak tanımlanmıştır. Mikroskobik analizin ikinci basamağı olarak, örneklerin 10 gram baldaki toplam polen sayıları değerleri (TPS10) hesaplanmış ve bu değerlerin 1 117 ile 82 005 arasında olduğu gözlemlenmiştir.

Keywords

Güneydoğu Anadolu bal melissopalinoloji

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELEMLİ, Ö. G., GÜRBÜZ, S., ÖZENİRLER, Ç., MAYDA, N., ÖZKÖK, A., SORKUN, K. (2019). MELISSOPALNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF HONEY SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM ŞIRNAK CITY. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 126–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/259583

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

Barth OM (2004) Melissoplaynology in Brazil: A review of pollen analysis of honeys, propolis and pollen loads of bees, Sci.Agric. 61:3.342-350.
Bogdanov S, Jurendic T., Sieber R, Gallman P (2008). Honey for Nutrition and Health: A Review, Journal of the American College of Nutrtition, 27,6, 677-689.
Can Z, Yıldız O, Şahin H, Turumtay EA, Silici S, Kolaylı S (2015). An investigation of Turkey honeys: Their physico-chemical properties, antioxidant capacities and phenolic profiles. Food Chemistry, 180, 133-141.
Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2001).
Revised Codex Standard for honey, Codex STAN 12–1981, Rev. 1 (1987), Rev., 2. Gür N (1993).Elazığ İlinde arıcılığın yoğun olduğu yörelerin ballarında polen analizi. Yüksek lisans tezi. Fırat üni. Fen bilimleri enstitüsü. 29syf. J. Alvarez-Suarez, S. Tulipani Romandini, E. Bertoli, M. Battino (2010).Contribution of honey in nutrition and human health: A review, Mediterr J. Nutr. Metab., 3: 15-23Kaplan A (1993). Konya yöresi ballarında polen analizi y üksek lisans tezi, ank ara üni. Fen bilimleri enstitüsü. 69 syf. Kaya Z, Binzet R, Orcan N (2005). Pollen analysis of honeys from some regions in Turkey. Apiacta, 40,10-15.
Kemancı I (1999). Marmaris yöresi ballarında polen analizi, yüksek lisans tezi, Ege Üniv. Fen bilimleri enstitüsü, 38 syf. Lieux MH (1972) A melissopalynological study of 54 Lousiana (USA) Louveaux J, Maurizio A, Vorwohl G (1978). Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World. 59, 139-153.Maurizio, A (1975). Microscopy of honey. – In: Honey: A comprehensive survey (ed. E. Crane), Heinemann, London. 240 – 257. Maurizio, A. (1975). Microscopy of honey. In: Crane, E. (Ed.), Honey: a Comprehensive Survey. Heinemann in cooperation with the Int. Bee Res. Ass, London, pp. 240–257.
Mercan N, Güvensen A, Çelik A, Katırcıoğlu H (2007). Antimicrobial activity and pollen composition of honey samples collected from different provinces in Turkey, Natural Product Reserach 21(3) 187-195.Moar N.T (1985). Pollen analysis of New Zealand Honey. Journal of Agricultural Research, 28-38.
Moar NT (1985). Pollen analysis of New Zealand Honey. Journal of Agricultural Research. 28-38.
Ndife J, Abioye L, Dandago M, Quality Assessment of Nigerian Honey Sourced from Different Floral Locations (2014)., Nigerian Food Journal, 32, 2, 48-55.
Qustani MA (1976) Das Mikroskopishe Bild der Honige des östlichen Mittelmeergebites, Diddertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenhaften vorgelegt dem Fachbereich allegemeine Nat