Journals / Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 26

Analysis of honey production costs and overall economic performance of beekeeping enterprises in the TR61 region

Gülhan Duran(MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5924-7724
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study aims to evaluate the productivity levels and overall economic performance of honey producers engaged in beekeeping activities in the provinces of Antalya, Isparta, and Burdur in the TR61 Region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to evaluate the productivity levels and overall economic performance of honey producers engaged in beekeeping activities in the provinces of Antalya, Isparta, and Burdur in the TR61 Region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data from 121 producers selected through proportional sampling were classified into three main groups, and their performance levels were estimated using the Global Economic Performance Indicator (GEPI).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the GEPI results, migratory (nomadic) beekeepers achieved the highest overall performance, with a score of 0.55.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beekeeping · Honey Production · Global Economic Performance Indicator

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the productivity levels and overall economic performance of honey producers engaged in beekeeping activities in the provinces of Antalya, Isparta, and Burdur in the TR61 Region. Data from 121 producers selected through proportional sampling were classified into three main groups, and their performance levels were estimated using the Global Economic Performance Indicator (GEPI). The three groups were classified according to production system (in-province nomadic, migratory (nomadic), and fixed beekeeping), hive number (Group 1 (<75 hives), Group 2 (75–149 hives), and Group 3 (≥150 hives)), and province (Antalya, Isparta, and Burdur). Based on the survey data, the average gross profit was estimated at 945.07 TL per hive, while the average net profit was 770.04 TL per hive. The economic performance indicators showed that migratory (nomadic) beekeepers, Group 2 (75–149 hives) producers, and producers in Antalya achieved the highest performance. In contrast, according to the non-economic indicators, including environmental costs and asset security, in-province nomadic and fixed beekeepers, Group 1 (<75 hives) producers, and producers in Burdur exhibited the best performance. According to the GEPI results, migratory (nomadic) beekeepers achieved the highest overall performance, with a score of 0.55.

🔖

Cite This Article

Duran, G., *, G. D. (2026). Analysis of honey production costs and overall economic performance of beekeeping enterprises in the TR61 region. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, Volume: 26. https://doi.org/10.31467/uluaricilik.1970326

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (79)

  1. Afriat SN. Efficiency estimation of production function. International Economics Review 1972;13:568–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2525845
  2. Açıl AF. Calculation of agricultural product costs and developments in agricultural product costs in our country. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Ankara, Türkiye, 1977,p. 91-115.
  3. Adgaba N, Al-Ghamdi A, Shenkute G, Ismaiel S, Al-Kahtani S, Tadess Y, et al. Socio-economic analysis of beekeeping and determinants of box hive technology adoption in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 2014;24:1-16.
  4. Akbağ IH, Özsayın D, İnce B. Evaluation of beekeeping activities in Fethiye district of Muğla province. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2025;40:139-158. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.1567401
  5. Akın AC, Aydoğan H, Özbek BM, Sipahi C. An investigation of the socio-economic structure of beekeeping enterprises: the case of Burdur province. Journal of the Turkish Veterinary Medical Society 2026;97:1-16. http://doi.org. 10.33188/vetheder.1699358
  6. Akinade TG. Prospects and challenges of beekeeping ın potiskum local government area of Yobe state, Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Agriculture and Biology Research 2019;7:19-25. http://doi.org.10. 20289/zfdergi.1162027
  7. Aktürk D, Aydın B. Structural characteristics of beekeeping enterprises and beekeeping activities in Çanakkale province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 2019;7:1618-1628. https://doi. org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i10.1618-1628.2661
  8. Al-Ghamdi AA, Adgaba N, Herab AH, Ansari MJ. Comparative analysis of profitability of honey production using traditional and box hives. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2017;24:1075-1080. http://doi.org.10.1016/ j.sjbs.2017.01.007
  9. Alkaya M, Candemir S. Current situation and economic analysis of beekeeping activities in Kemaliye district of Erzincan province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 2025;13:134-141. http://doi.org. 10.24925/turjaf.v13i1.134-141.6982
  10. Alropy ET, Desouki NE, Alnafissa MA. Economics of teknical efficiency in white honey production: using stochastic frontier production function. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2019;26:1478-1484. http://doi.org.10.1016/ j.sjbs.2019.09.029 A rslan E. General Structure of Beekeeping And Beekeeping Activities in Sivas Province. FU Institute of Health Sciences, Master's Thesis. Elazığ, 2016, (Access Date: 10.01.2025).
  11. Aydın B, Aktürk D, Arsoy D. Economic and efficiency analysis of beekeeping activity in Türkiye: case of Çanakkale province. Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Journal 2020;67:23-32. https://doi.org/10. 33988/auvfd.571371
  12. Balcı MG. Socioeconomic Analysis of Oak Honey Producers in Demirköy District of Kırklareli Province. OMU Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. Samsun, 2020, (Access Date: 20.02.2025),
  13. Battese G, Coelli T. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 1995;20:325-332. http://doi.org.10.1007/ BF01205442
  14. Borum A. A Study of beekeeping survey in Southern Marmara Region of Türkiye. Uludag Bee Journal 2017;17:24-34. https://doi.org/10. 31467/uluaricilik.373727
  15. Bouljlida A. Financial Performance of Manufacturing Smes: Conceptualization and Measurement. University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, Doctoral Thesis. Canada, 2002, (Access Date: 20.02.2025),
  16. Bremmers H, Omta O, Kemp R, Haverkamp D-J. Do stakeholder groups ınfluence environmental management system development in the dutch agri-food sector?. Business Strategy and the Environment 2007;16:214–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.480
  17. Bulak HS. Determining the General Structure of Beekeeping in Ordu Province. OU Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. Ordu, 2024, (Access Date: 10.02.2025).
  18. Cejvanovic F, Grgic Z, Maksimovic A, et al. Assumptions of economic model for sustainable productions of beekeeping in the Bosnia and Hercegovina. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2011;5:481-485.
  19. Crapon M, Quairel-Lanoizelée F. Myths and realities of the responsible company. La Découverte, Paris, France, 2005, p. 1-3.
  20. Çelik H. Structural Characteristics of Honey Beekeeping in Iğdır Province. IU Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. Iğdır, 2019, (Access Date: 20.02.2025),
  21. Çevrimli MB. Technical and Economic Analysis of Beekeeping Businesses: The Aegean Region Example. Institute of Health Sciences, Doctoral Thesis. Ankara, 2017, (Access Date: 20.06.2025),
  22. Çevrimli MB, Sakarya E. Structural characteristics and problems of beekeeping enterprises in Aegean Region example. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2018;34:83-91. https://doi.org.10.15312/EurasianJVetSci.2018.187
  23. Dedej S, Delaplane KS, Gocaj E. A technical and economic evaluation of beekeeping in Albania. Bee World 2015;81:87-97. http://doi.org.10.1080/0005772X.2000.11099476
  24. Delen D, Kuzey C, Uyar A. Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A decision tree approach. Expert Systems with Applications 2013;40:3970–3983.
  25. Emir M. Exploring the Socio-Economic Structure of Beekeepers and Their Production Efficiency in Türkiye. OMU Institute of Natural Sciences, Master's Thesis. Samsun, 2015, (Access Date: 24.02.2025),
  26. Engindeniz S, Uçar K, Başaran C. Economic aspects and problems of beekeeping in Izmir province. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2014;20:113-120.
  27. Erkuş A, Demirci R. Agricultural management and planning. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Ankara, Türkiye, 1996, p. 417-561.
  28. Fıratlı Ç, Genç F, Karacaoğlu, M, Gençer HV. Comparative Analysis of Beekeeping in Türkiye: Problems. Turkish Agricultural Engineering Technical Congress, Ankara-Türkiye, Proceedings Book, 2000 January 17-21, p. 811-825.
  29. Folayan J, Bifarin J. Profitability analysis of honey production in Edo north local government area of Edo state, Nigeria. Agricultural and Food Sciences 2013;2:60-64. http://doi.org.10. 15580/GJAS.2018.7.071318096
  30. Güneş T, Arıkan R. Agricultural economics statistics. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publication, Ankara, Türkiye, 1988, p.25-45.
  31. Gür MB. Socio-Economic Analysis of Oak Honey Producers in Demirköy District, Kırklareli Province. Master's Thesis. Samsun, 2020, (Access Date: 20.08.2025),
  32. Greene WH. LIMDEP, version 6.0. user’s manual and reference guide. New York Econometric Software, New York, America, 1991, p. 45-97.
  33. Hallaçoğlu Y. Structural Analysis of Beekeeping in Hatay Province. HMKU Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. Hatay, 2021, (Access Date: 20.02.2025),
  34. HGM Turkish General Directorate of Livestock, HAYGEM.
  35. IBM Corp. SPSS statistics for Windows, version 29.0. IBM Corp, New York, America, 2022, p. 65-78.
  36. Ilgar R. Beekeeping activities in Çanakkale province. Turkish Studies 2016;13:713-724. http://doi.org.10.7827/TurkishStudies.14134
  37. İnci H, Karakaya E, Topluk O. Structural characteristics of beekeeping enterprises in Bingöl province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Natural Sciences 2022;9:996-1013. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1174465
  38. Kadirhanoğulları İ. Economic Analysis of Apiculture in Igdır Province. IU Institute of Natural Sciences, Master's Thesis. Iğdır, 2016, (Access Date: 20.02.2025).
  39. Karahan Ş, Özbakır GÖ. Determining beekeeping activities and honey consumption habits in Southeastern Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Natural Sciences 2020;7:1148-1158. https://doi.org/10.30910/ turkjans.775427
  40. Karakaya E, Kızıloğlu S. Honey production in Bingöl province. Igdır University Journal of Science Institute 2015;5:25-31.
  41. Kıral T, Kasnakoğlu H, Tatlıdil FF, Fidan H, Gündoğmuş E. Cost calculation methodology and database guide for agricultural products. Agricultural Economics Research Institute Publications, Ankara, Türkiye, 1999, p.1-10.
  42. Kösoğlu M, Topal E, Takma Ç, Özkırım A, Özsoy N, Karaca Ü. Perspective of İzmir province beekeepers on bee diseases and pests. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Aegean University 2019;56:187-193. http:// doi.org.10.20289/zfdergi.451387
  43. Kroma S, Lamien N. Evaluation de la rentabilité et de la compétitivité de la chaine de valeur gomme arabique dans l'amélioration des conditions de vie des populations au sahel du Burkina Faso. Agronomie Africaine 2017;29:29-40.
  44. Latruffe L. Competitiveness, productivity and efficiency in the agricultural and agri-food sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Publications, Paris, France, 2010, p. 30-35.
  45. Marinković S, Nedić N. Analysis of production and competitiveness on small beekeeping farms in selected districts of Serbia. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce 2010;4:3-4. http://doi.org. 10.19041/Asstract/2010/3-4/10
  46. Maxime D, Marcotte M, Arcand Y. Development of eco-efficiency indicators for the Canadian food and beverage industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2005;14:636-648.
  47. Mbah S. Profitability of honey production enterprise in umuahia agricultural zone of Abia state, Nigeria, International Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 2012;15:1268-1274.
  48. McDonald T. Stop strategic planning and create shareholder value!. Management Decision 1998;36:456-459.
  49. Naro N. Corporate social responsibility and performance management. Corporate Social Responsibility Publications, Paris, France, 2005, p. 59-71.
  50. Nikolić M, Nedić N, Dordević-Milošević S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of organic honey production in Serbia. Economics of Agriculture 2022;69: 533-547.
  51. Okpokiri CI, Nwachukwu IN, Onwusiribe CN. Determinants and profitabilityof honey production in ikwuano local government area, Abia state, Nigeria. ScientificPapers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development 2015;15:211-216.
  52. Onuç Z, Yanar A, Saner G, Güler D. An analysis of the economic aspects of beekeeping activities: the case of İzmir-Kemalpaşa district/Türkiye. Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Journal 2019;56:7-14. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.420370
  53. Onyekuru A, Okorji E, Machebe N. Profitability analysis of honey production in Nsukka local government area of Enugu State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences 2010;1:166-169.
  54. Ören MN, Alemdar T, Parlakay O, Yılmaz H, Seçer A, Güngör C, Gürer B. Economic analysis of beekeeping activities in Adana province. Agricultural Economics Research Institute Ankara Publications, Ankara, Türkiye, 2010, p. 970-978.
  55. Örük G, Yılmaz A, Kara MA, Mikail N, Erkan C. Gross margin analysis of honey production: a case of Siirt province. Journal of Animal Production 2022;63:136-142. https://doi.org/ 10.29185/hayuretim.1141583
  56. Öztürk C, Subaşı OS, Uysal O, Seçer A, Alemdar T, Ören MN. Economic analysis of beekeeping operations and factors affecting production in Mediterranean Region of Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 2019;5:91-100.
  57. Parlakay O, Alemdar T. Technical and economic efficiency in peanut farming in Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2011;17:47-53.
  58. Saner G, Yücel B, Yercan M, Karaturhan B, Engindeniz S, Çukur F, Kösoğlu M. A Study on the technical and economic development of organic and conventional honey production and the ıdentification of alternative market opportunities: the case of Kemalpaşa district, İzmir province. Publications of the Institute for Agricultural Economics and Policy Development, Ankara, Türkiye, 2011, p. 1-156.
  59. Sayılı M. Consumer consumption patterns and habits regarding bee products in Tokat province. Uludag Bee Journal 2013;13:16-22. https://doi.org/10.31467/uluaricilik.162297
  60. Seğmenoğlu N. General Structure of Beekeeping And Beekeeping Activities in Adana Province. FU Institute of Health Sciences, Master's Thesis. Elazığ, 2018, (Access Date: 20.02.2025),
  61. Semerci A, Yurdagül Topal A. Cost analysis of honey production in beekeeping farms in Çanakkale province of Türkiye. Tekirdağ Faculty of Agriculture Journal 2026;23:740-754. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1188662.
  62. Sert D. Economic Analysis of Beekeeping Activities: The Case of Isparta Province. SDU Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. Isparta, 2017, (Access Date: 20.02.2025),
  63. Shrestha A. Study of production economics and production problems of honey in Bardiya district, Nepal. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 2018;34:240-245. http://doi.org.10.17582/ journal.sja/2018/34.2.240.245
  64. Sogue B. Analysis of The Profit Efficiency and Profitability of Maize Production in Burkina Faso: The Hauts-Bassins Example. AU Institute of Science, Doctoral Thesis. Antalya, 2019, (Access Date: 20.02.2025).
  65. Sogue B, Yılmaz İ. Overall economic performance of farms in Burkina Faso: case of maize. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics 2019;25:67-76. http://doi.org.10.24181/ tarekoder.501233.
  66. Soiiman MMS. An economic study of the production and marketing of bee honey in Sharkia Governorate. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences 2005;30: 2077-2087.
  67. Söğüt B, Şeviş HE, Karakaya E, İnci H. A study on the current situation, main problems, and proposed solutions in beekeeping businesses (Bingöl Province example). Uludag Bee Journal 2019;19:50-60. https://doi.org/10. 31467/uluaricilik.527115
  68. Subaşı OS, Uysal O, Seçer A, Öztürk C, Alemdar T, Ören MN. Economic analysis of beekeeping operations and factors affecting production in mediterranean region of Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 2019;5:91-100.
  69. Şahinler N, Gül A. Investigation of bee diseases in beekeeping operations located in the Hatay region. Uludag Bee Journal 2005;5:27-31.
  70. Şengül Z. Sustainability Assessment of Beekeeping Businesses in the Aegean Region. EU Institute of Science, Doctoral Thesis. İzmir, 2020, (Access Date: 30.03.2025).
  71. Şeviş HE. An Examination of The Structural Situation of Beekeeping in Bingöl, İts Problems, and Proposed Solutions. BU Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. Bingöl, 2018, (Access Date: 20.02.2025),
  72. Tabur Z, Gül A. Socioeconomic status of beekeepers in Uşak province. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2019;24:146-152.
  73. TurkStat Turkish Statistical Institute, TurkStat. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Arıcılık-Uretim-Istatistikleri-2025-49535, (access date: 02. 03. 2026).
  74. Varalan A, Çevrimli MB. A study on the socioeconomic structure of beekeeping businesses in Kars province. Dicle University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Journal 2023;16:102-107. https://doi.org/10.47027/ duvetfd.1330239
  75. Vaziritabar S, Esmaeilzade SM. Profitability and socio-economic analysis of beekeeping and honey production in Karaj state, Iran. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016;4:1341-1350.
  76. Yılmaz İ, Çelik H. Colony management of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) breeders in Igdır Province. International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science 2019;5:372-382.
  77. Yurdagül Topal M. The Economic Situation of Beekeeping Businesses in Çanakkale Province. ÇOMU Graduate Education Institute, Master's Thesis. Çanakkale, 2022, (Access Date: 20.06.2025).
  78. Zahm F, Alonso A, Ugaglia B. Of Man. The Evaluation of the Overall Performance of a Farm. 8th RIODD Congress, Synthesis of conceptual frameworks, measurement tools and application with the IDEA method, Lille- France, Proceedings Book, 2013 Jun 12-13, p. 32-56.
  79. ZB Republic of Türkiye Agricultural Bank, TCZB. https://www.ziraatbank.com.tr/tr/fiyatlar-ve-oranlar, (access date: 02. 03. 2025).