SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama / 2014 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

-

The effect of face to face interaction on critical thinking skills in web supported case-based learning / Web destekli örnek olay yönteminde yüz yüze etkileşimin öğrencilerin eleştirel düşünme becerilerine etkisi

Çelebi ULUYOL
Tolga GÜYER
Pages
918–941
Publication Date
2014-07-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis, done using OneWay ANOVA for Repeated Measures, showed that there was a meaningful difference on critical thinking scores following the environment that contains face to face interaction ([F(1–63)=187,091, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to review the effect of Face to Face Interaction on Critical Thinking Skills in Web Supported Case-Based Learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Single-group repeated measures design was used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis, done using OneWay ANOVA for Repeated Measures, showed that there was a meaningful difference on critical thinking scores following the environment that contains face to face interaction ([F(1–63)=187,091, p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Web desteği · örnek olay yöntemi · eleştirel düşünme

Abstract

The aim of this research is to review the effect of Face to Face Interaction on Critical Thinking Skills in Web Supported Case-Based Learning. Single-group repeated measures design was used in the study. The samples of the study were sixty five students, taking the Principles and Methods of Teaching course in their second year, in the department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology in the Gazi Faculty of Education in Gazi University. The research study took a total of seven weeks. The analysis, done using OneWay ANOVA for Repeated Measures, showed that there was a meaningful difference on critical thinking scores following the environment that contains face to face interaction ([F(1–63)=187,091, p

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, web destekli örnek olay yönteminde yüz yüze etkileşimin öğrencilerin eleştirel düşünme becerilerine etkisini incelemektir. Araştırmada tek gruplu tekrarlı ölçümler deseni kullanılmıştır Araştırmaya Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü’nde 2010-2011 Güz döneminde 2. Sınıfta okuyan ve Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri dersi alan 65 öğrenci katılmıştır. Uygulama toplam 7 hafta sürmüştür. Araştırma bulgularına göre, web destekli örnek olay yönteminde yüz yüze sınıf etkileşiminin ardından, öğrencilerin eleştirel düşünme becerileri ortalama puanları arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu görülmektedir ([F(1–63)=187,091, p<,05]). Benzer araştırmaların farklı disiplin ve sınıf düzeyinde de ortaya çıkarılmasına yönelik çalışmaların yapılması alanyazına katkı açısından önem taşımaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUYOL, Ç., GÜYER, T. (2014). -. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 918–941. https://ajindex.com/articles/250511

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alvarez, C. M. (1991). Case-Based Instruction and Learning: An Interdisciplinary Project, Reading is Knowledge. Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., ve Logan, J. (Editörler). Thirteenth Year Book ve The Collage Reading Association Andrews, L. (2002). Preparing general education pre-service teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 27–35.
  2. Aybek, B. (2007). Eleştirel düşünmenin öğretiminde öğretmenin rolü. Üniversite ve Toplum, 7 (2). Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., ve Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3 - 4), 3693 Bonk, C. J. ve Dennen, V. (1999). Teaching on the Web: With a little help from my pedagogical friends. Journal of Computingin Higher Education, 11(1), 3–28.
  3. Bradshaw, A.C., Bishop, J. L., Gens, L. S., Miller, S. L ve Rogers, A.R. (2002). The relationship of the world wide web to thinking skills. Education Media International. 39(3 - 4). Chance, P. (1986). Thinking in the classroom: A survey of programs. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Choi, I. ve Lee, K. (2008). A case-based learning environment design for real-world classroom management problem solving, Techtrends, 52(3). 26-31.
  4. Craig, D. Ul-Haq, Khan, S., Zimring, S., Keheo, C., Rick, C. ve Guzdial, M. (2000). Using an Unstructured Collaboration Tool to Support Peer Interaction in Large College Classes. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Cüceloğlu, D. (1994). İyi Düşün Doğru Karar Ver. İstanbul:
  5. Sistem Yayıncılık. Demirel, Ö. (2003). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Program Geliştirme (Beşinci baskı). Ankara:
  6. PegemA Yayıncılık Diamentes, T. ve Ovington, J. (2003). Storytelling: Using A Case Method Approach in Administrator Preparation Programs, Education, 123(3), 465-471
  7. Doğan, A. (2013). Üstbiliş ve üstbilişe dayalı öğretim. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 3, 6-20.
  8. Drucker, P. F. (1999). 21.Yüzyıl için yönetim tartışmaları. (Çev. İ. Bahçıvangil), İstanbul:
  9. Epilson. Facione, P. A. (1990). A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purpose of Educational Assessment and Instructions, The Delphi Report. East Lansing, National Center for Research on Teacher Training, EBSCOST ERIC Document No: ED315423. Facione, P. A. ve Facione, N. C. (1994). Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric. California Acade