SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH AND TEACHING EXPERIMENT METHODS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION: DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES

MATEMATİK EĞİTİMİ ÇALIŞMALARINDA TASARIM TABANLI ARAŞTIRMA VE ÖĞRETİM DENEYİ YÖNTEMLERİ: FARKLAR VE BENZERLİKLER

Gürsu AŞIK
Zuhal YILMAZ
Pages
343–367
Publication Date
2017-05-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Along with these aims, this study targets to frame a pathway for the researchers that will utilize these methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Design-based research and teaching experiments are relatively new and popular intervention methods compared to other research methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They have recognized as potential intervention methods that can generate theory, educational designs/products and technological developments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Along with these aims, this study targets to frame a pathway for the researchers that will utilize these methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tasarım tabanlı araştırma · öğretim deneyi · matematik eğitimi

Abstract

Design-based research and teaching experiments are relatively new and popular intervention methods compared to other research methods. They have recognized as potential intervention methods that can generate theory, educational designs/products and technological developments. The aim of this study is to explain design-based research and teaching experiment paradigms within their theoretical framework. Moreover, the study aims to examine the similarities and differences of the two methodologies with each other and also with other research methods and to explain how research designs should be in order to fulfil the characteristics of these two research methods. Along with these aims, this study targets to frame a pathway for the researchers that will utilize these methods.

Özet

Tasarım tabanlı araştırma (TtA) ve öğretim deneyi yöntemleri diğer araştırma yöntemleri ile karşılaştırıldığında oldukça yeni ve güncel yaklaşımlardır. Bu yeni araştırma yöntemlerinin kuram, eğitsel içerik, materyal ve yazılım geliştirme çalışmalarında etkin rol oynayabilecek bir araştırma yöntemi potansiyeline sahip olduğu öngörülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı tasarım tabanlı araştırma ve öğretim deneyi yaklaşımlarını kuramsal çerçeveleri ile açıklamak, birbiri ve diğer temel araştırma yöntemlerinden ortak ve farklı yönlerini irdelemek ve bu araştırma yöntemlerine uygun araştırma taslaklarının nasıl olması gerektiğini açıklamaktır. Çalışmanın TtA ve öğretim deneyi yöntemlerini kullanacak araştırmacılar için bir yol haritası olması hedeflenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AŞIK, G., YILMAZ, Z. (2017). DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH AND TEACHING EXPERIMENT METHODS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION: DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 343–367. https://ajindex.com/articles/250395

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Altun, M. (2006). Matematik öğretiminde gelişmeler. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 223-238.
  2. Ackermann, E. (1995). Construction and transference of meaning through form. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 341-354).
  3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Anderson, T. & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.
  4. Applebee, A. N., and Langer, J. A. (1983). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60(2), 168-175.
  5. Aşık, G. (2015). Üstbiliş odaklı problem çözme destek programı tasarım çalışması, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi,
  6. İstanbul.
  7. Bakker, A., & Smit, J. (2017). Theory development in design-based research: an example about scaffolding mathematical language. In S.Doff & R.Komoss (eds.), Making Change Happen (pp. 111-126).
  8. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Balcı, A. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma, yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler (11. Baskı). Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi. Barab, S. (2006). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the learning scientist. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
  11. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.
  12. Brown, A. L., Metz, K. E., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Social interaction and individual understanding in a community of learners: The influence of Piaget and Vygotsky. Piaget-Vygotsky: The Social Genesis of Thought, 145-170.
  13. Byrnes, J. P. (2001). Cognitive development and learning in instructional context (2nd Edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, E. O., Karadeniz, S. & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (22. Baskı). Ankara:
  14. Pegem Akademi. Clements, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 547-589).
  15. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  16. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiment in collaboration with teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307-333).
  17. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc