SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Trakya Eğitim Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

The Development of an Achievement Test for the Principles and Methods of Instruction Course

Melike OZUDOGRU
Meral AKSU
Pages
680–695
Publication Date
2019-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the KR-20 value was found to be 0.78.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to develop an Achievement Test in the Principles and Methods of Instruction Course. 14 objectives were developed in accordance with the aims and goals of the course as determined by the Council of Higher Education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first form of the achievement test which consisted of 49 items was applied to 486 sophomore students who took the Principles and Methods of Instruction Course at the spring semester of 2016-2017 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the KR-20 value was found to be 0.78.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Achievement test · principles and methods of instruction course · item analysis

Özet

The aim of this study was to develop an Achievement Test in the Principles and Methods of Instruction Course. 14 objectives were developed in accordance with the aims and goals of the course as determined by the Council of Higher Education. The first form of the achievement test which consisted of 49 items was applied to 486 sophomore students who took the Principles and Methods of Instruction Course at the spring semester of 2016-2017 academic year. Test Analysis Program (TAP, version 14. 7. 4) was used to examine the item discrimination indices, item difficulty indices and reliability coefficient of the achievement test. After conducting the analysis, the difficulty indices of the remaining items ranged between ‘0.15-0.74’ with a mean difficulty index of 0.51. The item discrimination indices were between ‘0.21-0.57’ with a mean difficulty index of 0.37. Finally, the KR-20 value was found to be 0.78.

🔖

Cite This Article

OZUDOGRU, M., AKSU, M. (2019). The Development of an Achievement Test for the Principles and Methods of Instruction Course. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 680–695. https://ajindex.com/articles/249119

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akhter, N., & Bahoo, R. (2015). Development of a semi standardized achievement test of education for intermediate level. Journal of Educational Research 18(1), 5-19.
  2. Anderson, L. W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D. R. (Ed.), Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2010). Öğrenme öğretim ve değerlendirme ile ilgili bir sınıflama: Bloom’un eğitimin hedefleri ile ilgili sınıflamasının güncelleştirilmiş biçimi (1st ed.). (Translator: Durmuş A. Özcelik., 2010.). Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Aydede, M. N., Caglayan, Ç., Matyar, F., & Gulnaz, O. (2006). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin kullandıkları öğretim yöntem ve tekniklerine ilişkin görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(32), 24-34.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (13th Ed.). Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi. Chiatula, V. O. (2015). Integrative pre-service elementary teacher training: The role of interdisciplinary collaborative mathematics. Education Faculty Publications 136(2), 113-122. Retrieved June 12, 2017, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095616
  6. Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). The problem of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 295–299. doi:10.1177/0022487104268057Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson. Demir, N., Kızılay, E., & Bektaş, O. (2016). Development of an achievement test about solutions for 7th graders: A validity and reliability study. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 209-237.
  7. Dikici, A., Gundogdu, R., & Yavuzer Y. (2006). Eğitim fakültesi mezunlarının eğitim bilimleri derslerine ilişkin görüşleri (Niğde üniversitesi örneği). [Opinions of education faculty graduates relating to pedagogy courses (The Sample of Niğde University)]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 172, 250-262.
  8. Eret, E. (2013). An assessment of pre-service teacher education in terms of preparing teacher candidates for teaching (Doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  9. Fidan, E. (2013). İlkokul öğrencileri için matematik dersi sayılar öğrenme alanında başarı testi geliştirilmesi [Development of achievement tests in the number domain of mathematics course for elementary school students] (Master’s thesis). Ankara University, Ankara.
  10. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design an