Journals / İstanbul İktisat Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 2

Multilateral Trading System And Trade Policies: Is Proteting In Import An Easy Task?

ÇOK TARAFLI TİCARET SİSTEMİ VE TİCARET POLİTİKALARI: İTHALATTA KORUMA KOLAY BİR İŞ Mİ?

Pages
100–160
Publication Date
2015-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Protectionism in traditional sense is no more a trade policy tool which can easily be used today.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The issue of protecting domestic industries against competition of foreign industries is a major argument among trade policy debates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While main argument concentrates on protecting against foreigners’ unfair practices, a lot of reasons can be put forward for protection under fair competition as well.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Protectionism in traditional sense is no more a trade policy tool which can easily be used today.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:çok taraflı ticaret sistemi · ticaret politikaları · rekabet

Abstract

The issue of protecting domestic industries against competition of foreign industries is a major argument among trade policy debates. While main argument concentrates on protecting against foreigners’ unfair practices, a lot of reasons can be put forward for protection under fair competition as well. Textbooks, related with international economics and international trade are full of protective policy measures and economic analysis of them. Trade unions, employers’ unions, business NGOs and political parties still believe in that protecting domestic industries is an easy policy choice; and are exerting pressures on governments toward this direction. However, the developments, such as the increase of mutual economic dependency among countries, the internalization of production and supply chains and ever increasing recognition by almost all trading nations of the discipline of multilateral trading system since the beginning of the second half the 20th century, especially after 1980s, have made obsolete most of the policy tools of the past and their rezoning. Laid the foundation in 1948 with the enactment of the GATT and reinforced by the establishment of the WTO in 1994, multilateral trading system has disciplined the protectionism to a considerable extent. Protectionism in traditional sense is no more a trade policy tool which can easily be used today.

Özet

Ulusal sanayilerin yabancı rakipler karşısında korunması meselesi ti- caret politikası tartışmalarının başata gelen konularındandır. Yabancıların haksız rekabetine karşı koruma temel argüman olmakla birlikte, adil re- kabet ortamında bile koruma konusunda çok sayıda gerekçe bulunabilir. Uluslararası iktisat ve ticaretle ilgili ders kitapları uygulanabilecek koruma politikaları ve bunların etkilerinin ekonomik analizleri ile doludur. İşçi ve işveren sendikaları, sivil toplum kuruluşları ve siyasi partiler hala koruma- nın kolay bir ticaret politikası olduğuna inanmakta ve bu konuda hükümet- lere baskı yapmaktadırlar. Hâlbuki 20. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından, özellikle de 1980’lerden itibaren uluslararası ticarette karşılıklı bağımlılığın artması, üretim ve tedarik zincirinin uluslararasılaşması ve çok taraflı ticaret siste- minin dünyada gittikçe yerleşmesi gibi gelişmeler, geleneksel anlamdaki koruma gerekçeleri ve koruma araçlarının birçoğunu devreden çıkartmıştır. Temelleri 1948’de GATT’ın yürüğe girmesi ile atılan ve 1994’te DTÖ’nün kurulması ile sağlamlaşan çok taraflı ticaret sistemi, korumayı önemli ölçüde disiplin altına almıştır. Günümüzde, geleneksel anlamdaki koruma- cılık artık kolayca başvurulan bir ticaret politikası değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARILTI, H. (2015). Multilateral Trading System And Trade Policies: Is Proteting In Import An Easy Task?. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 2, 100–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/244054

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Agreement Customs Valuation (1994). www.wto.org (16.12.2015) Agreement on Antidumping (Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1994). www.wto.org (14.12.2015)
  2. Agreement on Import Licenses (1994). www.wto.org (16.12.2105) Agreement on Preshipment Inspection. (1994). www.wto.org (22.12.2015)
  3. Agreement on Rules Origin (1994). www.wto.org (22.12.2015)
  4. Agreement on Safeguard (1994). www.wto.org (14.12.2015) Agreement on Sanitary and Photosanitay Measures. www.wto.org (12.12.2015) Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. (1994). www.wto. org. (9.12.2015)
  5. Agreement on Textile and Clothing (1994). www.wto.org (14.12.2015)
  6. Agreement Technical Barrier to Trade (1994). www.wto.org (12.12.2015)
  7. AKP, Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi (2015). 7 Haziran Genel Seçimleri Seçim Beyannamesi Baldwin, R. E. (1969, ss. 295-305). ‘The case against infant industry tariff protection. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 77, No.3 (May-June 1969)
  8. Barone, B. and R. Bendini. (2015). Protectionism in the G 20. http:// www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/549028/EXPO_ STU(2015)549028_EN.pdf Corden, W.M. (1994).
  9. Economic Policy, Exchange Rates, and the International System, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  10. Crowley, M. A. (2006), ‘Do safeguard tariffs and antidumping duties open or close technology gaps?’, Journal of International Economics 68(2): 469-484. DTM (Ekonomi Bakanlığı). (2007). Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye. Altıncı baskı. Ankara:
  11. DTM Eichengeren, B. (1987). Did International Economic Forces Cause the Great Depression? Working Paper, University of California Ekonomi Bakanlığı. (2015). 2015 Ürün Güvenliği Tebliğleri. www. ekonomi.gov.tr (16.12.2015)
  12. Emerson, M., T. Kovziridse and V. Movchan. (2014). Russia’s Punitive Trade Policy Measures towards Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Working Document no:400. Brucelles: Centre for European Policy Studies. www.ceps.eu (26.11.2015)
  13. EU Commission (2015).
  14. Food and Feed Safety, Animal Health and Welfare, Plant Health. http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biosafety/establishments/ index_en.htm (21.12.2015) EU Commission (2015a). Technical Barriers to Trade. http://trade. ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/april/tradoc_150987.pdf (24.11.2015
  15. Evenet, S. J., J. Fritz. (20015). The Tide Turns? Trade, Protectionism, and Slowing Global Growth The 18th Global Trade Alert Report. London: CEPR, Centre for Economic Policy Research GATT 94 (1994). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994. www. wto