Journals / European Oral Research / 2009 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1-2

PROSTHETIC INDICATIONS AND ADVANTAGES OF MINI IMPLANTS

MİNİ İMPLANTLARIN PROTETİK KULLANIM ALANLARI VE AVANTAJLARI

Pages
23–29
Publication Date
2013-08-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This report describes the various indications in detail and gives clinical examples of cases treated by the authors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mini dental implants are often used in orthodontics for anchorage purposes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In prosthodontics small-diameter implants have nbeen advocated for specific clinical situations including reduced inter-radicular bone, a thin alveolar crest and provisional support and retention of immediate dentures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This report describes the various indications in detail and gives clinical examples of cases treated by the authors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mini implantlar · aşırı rezorbe alt çene · geçici implant

Abstract

Mini dental implants are often used in orthodontics for anchorage purposes. In prosthodontics small-diameter implants have nbeen advocated for specific clinical situations including reduced inter-radicular bone, a thin alveolar crest and provisional support and retention of immediate dentures. This report describes the various indications in detail and gives clinical examples of cases treated by the authors.

Özet

Daha çok ortodontide ankraj endikasyonu olan mini implantlar, protetik diş tedavisinde de yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Mini implantlar aşırı rezorbe olarak genişlik açısından implant uygulamasına elverişli olmayan durumlarda hastayı stabil protezlerle rahat ettirmek için kullanılabileceği gibi, sıklıkla geçici implantlar olarak da hizmet etmektedirler. Bir başka endikasyon ise iki diş arası mesafe normal boyutlardaki bir implantın yerleştirilmesine izin vermeyecek kadar dar olduğu durumlardır. Bu makalede bu farklı endikasyonlar ayrıntılı olarak anlatılmakta ve vaka örnekleri ile desteklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLHAN, H., ARAT, S., MUMCU, E., KURT, H. (2013). PROSTHETIC INDICATIONS AND ADVANTAGES OF MINI IMPLANTS. European Oral Research, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1-2, 23–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/243353

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Zubery Y ve ark. Immediate loading of modual transitional histomorphometric study in dogs. International Journal Dentistry, 1999; 19: 343-53. histologic and of Periodontics and Restorative Balkin BE, Steflik DE, Naval F. Minidental implant technique for ongoing applications. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2001; 27: 32-7.
  2. Krennmair G, Weinlander M, Schidinger S. Provisional implants for anchoring removable interim prostheses in edentulous jaws: a clinical study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2003; 18: 582-88. Leshem D ve ark. A simple technique for fabrication of immediate interim removable prosthesis supported by transitional implants. Implant Dentistry, 2003; 12: 227-29. Stegaroiu R ve ark. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1998; 13: 82-90. Kunavisarut C ve ark. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2002; 11: 30-40. Adell R ve ark. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral Surgery, 1981; 10: 387-416. 8. Lozada JL ve ark. dimensional analysis of two finite-element endosseous implant designs. Journal of Oral Implantology, 1994; 20: 315-21. three PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1983; 50: 399-410. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1996; 7: 143-52.
  3. Morgan MJ, James DF, Pilliar RM. Fractures of the fixture component of an osseointegrated implant. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1993; 8: 409-14. Yokoyama S ve ark. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2004; 91: 234-40.
  4. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996; 76: 165-69.
  5. Akca, K, Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior Rehabilitation 2002; 29: 350-56. Journal of Oral Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of