SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Oral Research / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

RECIPROC VERSUS TWISTED FILE FOR ROOT CANAL FILLING REMOVAL: ASSESSMENT OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS

Demet ALTUNBAŞ
Betül KÜTÜK
Mustafa TOYOĞLU
Gizem KUTLU
Alper KUŞTARCI
Kürşat ER
Pages
31–37
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both the rotary file (TF) and the reciprocating single-file (Reciproc) systems were associated with less apical extrusion compared with the H-file.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment with different file systems.Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests.Results: The Reciproc and TF systems extruded significantly less debris than the H-file (p<0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both the rotary file (TF) and the reciprocating single-file (Reciproc) systems were associated with less apical extrusion compared with the H-file.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Endodontics · Retreatment · Root canal preparation

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment with different file systems.Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this study. Root canals of the teeth were instrumented and filled before being randomly assigned to three groups. Guttapercha was removed using the Reciproc system, the Twisted File system (TF), and Hedström-files (H-file). Apically extruded debris was collected and dried in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The amount of extruded debris was assessed with an electronic balance. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests.Results: The Reciproc and TF systems extruded significantly less debris than the H-file (p<0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the Reciproc and TF systems.Conclusion: All tested file systems caused apical extrusion of debris. Both the rotary file (TF) and the reciprocating single-file (Reciproc) systems were associated with less apical extrusion compared with the H-file.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNBAŞ, D., KÜTÜK, B., TOYOĞLU, M., KUTLU, G., KUŞTARCI, A., ER, K. (2016). RECIPROC VERSUS TWISTED FILE FOR ROOT CANAL FILLING REMOVAL: ASSESSMENT OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS. European Oral Research, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 31–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/242920

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Siqueira JF, Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: Why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001;34(1):1-10.
  2. Friedman S, Stabholz A, Tamse A. Endodontic retreatment-case selection and technique. 3. Retreatment techniques. J Endod 1990;16(11):543-549.
  3. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics:I. Etiological factors. J Endod 1985;11(11):472-478.
  4. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rocas IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, Abad EC. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002;28(6):457-460.
  5. Burklein S, Schafer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012;38(6):850-852.
  6. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with protaper universal, protaper next, twisted file adaptive, and hyflex instruments. J Endod 2014;40(10):1638-1641.
  7. Er K, Sumer Z, Akpinar KE. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2005;38(12):871-876.
  8. Kustarci A, Akpinar KE, Er K. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(2):257-262.
  9. Kustarci A, Akpinar KE, Sumer Z, Er K, Bek B. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2008;41(12):1066-1071.
  10. Kustarci A, Altunbas D, Akpınar KE. Comparative study of apically extruded debris using one manual and two rotary instrumentation techniques for endodontic retreatment. J Dent Sci 2012;7(2):1-6.
  11. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Threedimensional evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. J Endod 2008;34(11):1370-1373.
  12. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E. Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod 2006;32(5):469-472.
  13. Simsek N, Ahmetoglu F, Keles A, Bulut ET, Er K. 3d analysis of d-race and self-adjusting file in removing filling materials from curved root canals instrumented and filled with different techniques. Scientific World Journal 2014;836513. Tasdemir T, Er K, Yildirim T, Celik D. Efficacy of three rotary niti instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals. Int Endod J 2008;41(3):191-196.
  14. Akpinar KE, Altun