Journals / Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Middle School Students' Mathematical Generalization Abilities with the use of Different Representations

Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Farklı Temsil Biçimlerini Kullanarak Matematiksel Genelleme Yapma Becerileri

Pages
103–129
Publication Date
2017-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They have transformed visual patterns into number patterns and have not been able to make effective use of pictorial patterns.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to examine the forms of thinking and generalization types of students during the generalization of the patterns presented with different representations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted with 92 students studying in the sixth, seventh and eighth grades.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They have transformed visual patterns into number patterns and have not been able to make effective use of pictorial patterns.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Genelleme · cebirsel genelleme · temsiller

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the forms of thinking and generalization types of students during the generalization of the patterns presented with different representations. It is aimed to examine the generalizations used by the students through the theoretical framework, to determine the forms of thinking that prevent them from making algebraic generalization and to determine the use of different representations of the students. For this purpose, case survey research is used in the research. Participants were selected by purposeful sampling method. The study was conducted with 92 students studying in the sixth, seventh and eighth grades. Descriptive and content analysis were used to analyze the data. Data analysis has shown that students tended to have arithmetic generalizations rather than algebraic generalizations. Students have difficulties in making algebraic generalizations using pictorial patterns. They have transformed visual patterns into number patterns and have not been able to make effective use of pictorial patterns.

Özet

Bu araştırmada farklı temsil biçimleriyle sunulan örüntüleri genellemede öğrencilerin düşünme şekillerini ve genelleme yapma türlerini incelemek amaçlanmaktadır. Öğrencilerin kullandıkları genelleme türlerinin kuramsal çerçeve bağlamında incelenmesi, cebirsel genelleme yapmaya engel olan düşünme şekillerinin belirlenmesi ve öğrencilerin farklı temsil biçimlerini genelleme yapma yönünde kullanma şekillerinin saptanması hedeflenmektedir. Bu bağlamda araştırmada örnek olay tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilmiştir. Çalışma altıncı, yedinci ve sekizinci sınıfta okuyan 92 öğrenciyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen veriye betimsel ve içerik analizi uygulanmıştır. Veri analizi öğrencilerin cebirsel genelleme yerine aritmetik genelleme eğilimlerinin olduğunu göstermiştir. Öğrenciler şekil örüntülerini kullanarak cebirsel genelleme yapmada güçlük çekmişlerdir. Şekil örüntülerini sayı örüntüsüne dönüştürmüşler ve şekil örüntüsünden etkili şekilde yararlanamamışlardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİLDERE-İMRE, S., AKKOÇ, H., BAŞTÜRK-ŞAHİN, B. N. (2017). Middle School Students' Mathematical Generalization Abilities with the use of Different Representations. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 103–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/241245

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M., & Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematical generalization. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 3-22.
  2. Caspi, S., & Sfard, A. (2012). Spontaneous meta-arithmetic as a first step toward school algebra. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 45–65.
  3. Davydov, V. V. (1990). Soviet studies in mathematics education, volume 2. types of generalization in instruction: logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Dörfler, W. (1991). Forms and means of generalization in mathematics. In A. J. Bishop (Ed.), Mathematical knowledge: Its growth through teaching (pp. 63-85). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  4. Ferrara, F., & Sinclair, N. (2016). An early algebra approach to pattern generalisation: Actualising the virtual through words, gestures and toilet paper. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 1–19.
  5. Ferrara, F., & Ferrari, G. (2017). Agency and assemblage in pattern generalisation: A materialist approach to learning. Educ Stud Math, 94(1), 21-36.
  6. Jones, L. (1993). Algebra in the primary school. Education, 21(2), 27-31.
  7. Frobisher, L., & Threlfall, J. (1999). Teaching and assessing patterns in the primary years. In A. Orton (Ed.), Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 64-103). London: Cassell. Harel, G., & Tall, D. (1991). The general, the abstract and the generic in advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 38–42.
  8. Hill, T., Lannin, J., & van-Garderen, D. (2015). Promoting and assessing mathematical generalising. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 20(4), 3-8.
  9. Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In T. Romberg & E. Fennema (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133–155).
  10. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kılıç, Ç. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin lineer sayı örüntüsüne bağlı olarak şekil örüntüsü oluşturma stratejilerinin analizi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 12(6), 1205-1230.
  11. Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. In C. Alsina, J. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde & A. Pérez (Eds.), 8th ınternational congress on mathematical education: Selected lectures (pp. 271-290).
  12. Seville, Spain: S.A.E.M. Thales. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  13. Lannin, J., Ellis, A., Elliott, R., & Zbiek, R. (2011). Developing