Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of a Peer and Self-Assessment-Based Editorial Study on Students’ Ability to Follow Spelling Rules and Use Punctuation Marks Correctly

Pages
268–284
Publication Date
2021-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, it was determined that PSABES was effective in students' performance in adhering to spelling rules and using punctuation correctly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In studies conducted to improve primary school students' writing skills, it has been determined that they make errors in the use of the punctuation marks and do not use spelling rules correctly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, an explanatory mixed design was used, and the research was carried out with 60 fourth-grade students attending a public school in Istanbul during the 2019-2020 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, it was determined that PSABES was effective in students' performance in adhering to spelling rules and using punctuation correctly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Peer assessment · self-assessment · writing instruction

Abstract

In studies conducted to improve primary school students' writing skills, it has been determined that they make errors in the use of the punctuation marks and do not use spelling rules correctly. The purpose of this study was to reveal the effect of a qualified and planned peer and self-assessment-based editorial study [PSABES] on the success of fourth-grade elementary school students in following spelling rules and using punctuation correctly. In this study, an explanatory mixed design was used, and the research was carried out with 60 fourth-grade students attending a public school in Istanbul during the 2019-2020 academic year. According to the results of the research, it was determined that PSABES was effective in students' performance in adhering to spelling rules and using punctuation correctly. This was due to PSABES’ contribution to creating a positive attitude toward writing, increasing motivation, learning desire and communication skills, and allowing students to gain a culture of criticism, feel more valuable, recognize their mistakes, take responsibility and write more carefully. This research clearly demonstrates the effects of peer and self-assessment on the correct use of spelling rules, and punctuation marks. In subsequent research, the effects of self and peer assessment on students' overall writing success can be examined, and it can also be investigated how this process plays a role in shaping the writer identity of students.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAVŞANLI, Ö. F., KARA, Ü. E. (2021). The Effect of a Peer and Self-Assessment-Based Editorial Study on Students’ Ability to Follow Spelling Rules and Use Punctuation Marks Correctly. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 268–284. https://ajindex.com/articles/239077

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akyol, H. (2006). Turkish first reading and writing instruction. Pegem A Publishing, Ankara.
  2. Andrade, H., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287-302.
  3. Aram, D. (2005). Continuity in children’s literacy achievements: Alongitudinal perspective from kindergarten to school. First Language, 25, 259–289.
  4. Bagci, H. (2007). An evaluation of the attitudes of the candidates of teacher of turkish towards written expression and the courses of written expression. Journal of Turkology Research, 21(21), 29-61.
  5. Batur, Z., Akar, C., Tufan, B. S., & Topaloglu, N. (2016). Second grade primary school students' punctuation marks using skill. International Journal of Turkish Education and Training, 1(2), 46-60.
  6. Bayat, N. (2014). The effect of the process writing approach on writing success and anxiety. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14 (3), 1123-1141.
  7. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.
  8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74.
  9. Bloodgood, J. W. (1999). What’s in a name? Children’s name writing and literacy acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 342–367.
  10. Cook-Sather, A. (2010). Students as learners and teachers: Taking responsibility, transforming education, and redefining accountability. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(4), 555-575.
  11. Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Publication. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousands Oaks, California: Sage publications. Cunningham, P. M., & Cunnigham, J. W. (2010). What really matters in writing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F. J., & Stokking, K. M. (2012). Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance. Learning and Instruction, 22, 171-184.
  12. Erdem, H. (2007). High schooll 9th class students' acquisition level of orthography and punctuation rules. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Eucational Sciences, Ankara,
  13. Turkey. Ergin, S. (2009). Primary school 8th grade students skills of using punctuation. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Gazi University, I