SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Grafik Örgütleyicilerin İlkokul 3. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Problem Kurma Becerileri Üzerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi

The Effect of Graphic Organizers on the Problem Posing Skills of 3rd Grade Elementary School Students

ÖMER FARUK TAVŞANLI
Tuğçe KOZAKLI ÜLGER
ABDULLAH KALDIRIM
Pages
377–406
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the results of the study, it was found that graphic organizers increased the problem-solving success of 3rd grade primary school students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was determined to examine the effect of graphic organizers on problem posing skills of 3rd grade primary school students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the quantitative dimension of this study, a semi-experimental study was conducted to determine the effect of graphic organizers on problem posing skills of 3rd grade elementary school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the results of the study, it was found that graphic organizers increased the problem-solving success of 3rd grade primary school students.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was determined to examine the effect of graphic organizers on problem posing skills of 3rd grade primary school students. The present study was designed following the explanatory mixed method design. In the quantitative dimension of this study, a semi-experimental study was conducted to determine the effect of graphic organizers on problem posing skills of 3rd grade elementary school students. Regarding the qualitative dimension of the study, interviews were conducted with the classroom teachers to find out the effects of problem posing training supported by the graphic organizers on problem posing skills of 3rd grade elementary school students. The study was carried out with the participation of 38 third grade students. Based on the results of the study, it was found that graphic organizers increased the problem-solving success of 3rd grade primary school students. Furthermore, according to the opinions of the teachers who implemented the training, the graphic organizers facilitated the students’ problem posing processes, made the problem posing activities more systematic and more enjoyable, strengthened the students’ sense of valuing mathematics and helped students to maintain their concentration throughout the study

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı grafik örgütleyicilerin, ilkokul 3.sınıf öğrencilerinin problem kurma becerileri üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada açıklayıcı sıralı desen yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın nicel boyutunda grafik örgütleyicilerin ilkokul 3. sınıf öğrencilerin problem kurma becerileri üzerine etkisini tespit etmek için yarı deneysel bir çalışma yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın nitel boyutunda grafik örgütleyicilerle desteklenmiş problem kurma eğitiminin ilkokul 3. sınıf öğrencilerin problem kurma becerileri üzerinde nasıl bir etkisi olduğuna ilişkin sınıf öğretmeniyle bir görüşme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma 38 üçüncü sınıf öğrencisi ve sınıf öğretmeni ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın nicel verileri problem kurma başarı testi, nitel verileri ise yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme yoluyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre grafik örgütleyicilerin ilkokul 3.sınıf öğrencilerinin problem kurma becerilerini arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca uygulamayı gerçekleştiren öğretmenin görüşlerine göre grafik örgütleyicilerin, öğrencilerin problem kurma süreçlerini kolaylaştırdığını, problem kurma etkinliklerini daha sistemli ve daha eğlenceli bir hale getirdiğini, öğrencilerin matematiğe değer verme hislerini güçlendirdiğini ve öğrencilerin çalışma boyunca ilgilerini korumalarına yardımcı olduğunu ifade etmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

TAVŞANLI, Ö. F., ÜLGER, T. K., KALDIRIM, A. (2018). Grafik Örgütleyicilerin İlkokul 3. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Problem Kurma Becerileri Üzerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 377–406. https://ajindex.com/articles/285142

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abramovich, S., & Cho, E. (2015). Using digital technology for mathematical problem posing. In F. M. Singer, N. Ellerton & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice (pp. 71-102). New York: Springer. Ahmad, S., & Zanzali, N. (2006). Problem posing abilities in mathematics of malaysian primary year 5 children: An exploratory study. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Teknologi Malaysia, 2 (8), 1-9.
  2. Alvermann, D. E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. The Journal of Educational Research, 75 (1), 44-48.
  3. Ayres, L. (2008). Semi structured interview. In L. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 810-811). California: Sage. Berg, B. L. (2000). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon. Bernhardt, T. M. (2010). Using graphic organizers to enhance reading comprehension. Unpublished master thesis, University of California, California. Bonotto, C. (2013). Artifacts as sources for problem-posing activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 37-55.
  4. Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1990).
  5. The art of problem posing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cai, J. (1998). An investigation of U.S. and Chinese students' mathematical problem posing and problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal,10 (1), 37–50.
  6. Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 401-421.
  7. Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2003). A Perspective for examining the link between problem posing and problem solving.Paper presented in Annual Meeting of the PME and PME/NA. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii. Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2013). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students' learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57-69.
  8. Can, A. (2016). Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS. Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi. Connolly, P., & Vilardi, T. (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. New York: Teachers College Press.
  10. Creswell, J. (2009). Research design qualittive, ouantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. California: Sage Publications. Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). De