Journals / Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between the Board Structure and Bank Profitability: Dynamic Panel Data Analysis

YÖNETİM KURULU YAPISI VE BANKA KARLILIĞI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: DİNAMİK PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Pages
248–264
Publication Date
2018-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained from the study, there is no statistically significant association between board size and profitability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between board structure of commercial banks and their profitability in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study covers the time period of 2007-2013 and dynamic panel regression models (Pooled OLS, fixed effects and system GMM estimators) are used in the analysis process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained from the study, there is no statistically significant association between board size and profitability.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2007-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Banka Karlılığı · Yönetim Kurulu Yapısı · Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between board structure of commercial banks and their profitability in Turkey. The study covers the time period of 2007-2013 and dynamic panel regression models (Pooled OLS, fixed effects and system GMM estimators) are used in the analysis process. The variables such as board size, the proportion of independent directors, the proportion of foreign directors and the dual position of the chairman of the board and the general manager of the bank are used for the board characteristics. According to the results obtained from the study, there is no statistically significant association between board size and profitability. In addition, both the proportion of independent directors and the proportion of foreign directors are found to be negatively related to bank profitability. It has also been observed that the influence of dual position of the chairman of the board and general manager of the bank on profitability is positive. As for the control variables, there is no statistically significant link between bank size and lending level variables and profitability. However, the effect of bank capital on profitability is positive and statistically significant.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de mevduat bankalarının yönetim kurulu yapısı ile banka karlılığı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışma 2007-2013 dönemini kapsamaktadır ve analizlerde dinamik panel regresyon modelleri (Havuzlanmış EKK, sabit etkiler ve sistem GMM tahmincileri) kullanılmıştır. Yönetim kurulu değişkeni olarak, yönetim kurulunun büyüklüğü, bağımsız yönetici oranı, yabancı yönetici oranı ve liderlik yapısı değişkenleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre, yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü ile karlılık arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır. Hem yönetim kuruluna atanan bağımsız yönetici sayısı ile hem de yönetim kurulunda yer alan yabancı yönetici sayısı ile karlılık arasında negatif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Genel müdürlük ve yönetim kurulu başkanlığı görevlerini aynı kişinin icra etmesi durumunun ise karlılığı artırdığı görülmüştür. Banka düzeyinde kullanılan kontrol değişkenlerinden banka büyüklüğü ve kredilendirme düzeyi değişkeni ile banka karlılığı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki çıkmamıştır. Banka sermayesi değişkeni ile banka karlılığı arasında ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü bir ilişki bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSOY, E., AYDIN, Y. (2018). The Relationship between the Board Structure and Bank Profitability: Dynamic Panel Data Analysis. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 248–264. https://ajindex.com/articles/235901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adams, R. B. and Mehran, H. (2012). Bank Board Structure and Performance: Evidence for Large Bank Holding Companies. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(2), 243-267.
  2. Arellano, M. and Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Model. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51.
  3. Aygün, M., Taşdemir, A. ve Çavdar, E. (2010). Banka Performansı Üzerinde Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğünün Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(3), 67-78.
  4. Belhaj, S. and Mateus, C. (2016). Corporate Governance Impact on Bank Performance: Evidence from Europe. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(4), 583-597.
  5. Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Macmillan. Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
  6. Bukair, A. A. and Rahman, A. A. (2015). Bank Performance and Board of Directors Attributes by Islamic Banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 8(3), 291-309.
  7. Chahine, S. and Safieddine, A. (2011). Is Corporate Governance Different for the Lebanese Banking System?. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(2), 207-226.
  8. Choi, S. and Hasan, I. (2005).
  9. Ownership, Governance, and Bank Performance: Koreanexperience. Financial Markets, Institutions& Instruments, 14(4), 215-242.
  10. De Andres, P. and Vallelado, E. (2008). Corporate Governance in Banking: The Role of the Board of Directors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2570-2580.
  11. Denis, D. K. (2001). Pages Twenty-Five Years of Corporate Governance Research … and Counting. Review of Financial Economics, 10(3), 191-212.
  12. Doğan, M. and Yıldız, F. (2013). The Impact of the Board of Directors’ Size on the Bank’s Performance: Evidence from Turkey. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(6), 130-140.
  13. Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory? CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-65.
  14. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
  15. Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349. García-Meca, E., García-Sánchez, I. M. and Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2015). Board Diversity and its Effects on Bank Performance: An International Analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 53, 202-214. Georgantopou