SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Credit Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Islamic and Conventional Banks in Turkey

Mohammed ALKHAWAJA
Şakir GÖRMÜŞ
Pages
45–64
Publication Date
2019-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were clear differences between both Islamic and Conventional banks related to all variables of study except Loan Loss Provision and Proportion of Loan to Assets ratios.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to identify variables which determine credit risk in Islamic and Conventional banks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Panel data fixed effect model employed to analyze which belongs to three Islamic Banks in Turkey for the period 2008 Q1 to 2017 Q4.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were clear differences between both Islamic and Conventional banks related to all variables of study except Loan Loss Provision and Proportion of Loan to Assets ratios.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Credit Risk · Non-performing Loans · Islamic Banks

Abstract

This study aims to identify variables which determine credit risk in Islamic and Conventional banks. Panel data fixed effect model employed to analyze which belongs to three Islamic Banks in Turkey for the period 2008 Q1 to 2017 Q4. While for conventional banks, previous studies that has been conducted in Turkey used to compare Islamic to Conventional banks (CB). Non-performing Loans (NPL) ratio was used as a proxy for credit risk. Result from fixed effect model showed that NPL in Islamic Banks is positively affected by Loan Loss Provision and Proportion of Loans to Deposits, and it is negatively affected by Assets Size. While literature showed that conventional bank’s credit risk is positively affected by Net Interest Margin, Loan Loss Provision, and Capital Adequacy Ratio and it is negatively affected by Proportion of Loan to Deposits, Proportion of Loans to Assets and Size. There were clear differences between both Islamic and Conventional banks related to all variables of study except Loan Loss Provision and Proportion of Loan to Assets ratios.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKHAWAJA, M., GÖRMÜŞ, Ş. (2019). Credit Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Islamic and Conventional Banks in Turkey. Uluslararası İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 45–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/233820

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abdioğlu, N., & Aytekin, S. (2016). Takipteki Kredi Oranını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi: Mevduat Bankaları Üzerinde Bir Dinamik Panel Veri Uygulaması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 538-555. Adjé, K. G. (2018). Determinants of Bank Credit Risk in Developing Economies: Evidence from Benin. International Business Research, 11(4), 154-163.
  2. Ahmad, N. H., & Ahmad, S. N. (2004). Key factors influencing credit risk of Islamic bank: A Malaysian case. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 1(1), 65-80.
  3. Ahmad, N. H., & Ahmad, S. N. (2004). Key factors influencing credit risk of Islamic bank: A Malaysian case. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 1(1), 65-80.
  4. Ahmad, N. H., & Ariff, M. (2007). Multi-country study of bank credit risk determinants. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 5(1), 135-152.
  5. Akkizidis, Ioannis and Kumar, Sunil Khandelwal. (2008). Financial Risk Management for Islamic Banking and Finance. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Al-Fawwaz et al 2016. الفواز، تركي مجحم, داود، حسام علي, & عربيات، ياسر أحمد. (2016). إدارة مخاطر الائتمان في البنوك الإسلامية والبنوك التقليدية في الأردن= Credit Risk Management in Islamic and Conventional Banks in Jordan. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 407(3974), 1-27.‎
  6. Al-Fijawi, M. F. A. (2016). Salam (forward sale) and ıstıønaņ (manufacture contract) ın modern applıcatıons: a maqóøıd al-sharīņah perspectıve. Alhassan, A. L., Kyereboah-Coleman, A., & Andoh, C. (2014). Asset quality in a crisis period: An empirical examination of Ghanaian banks. Review of Development Finance, 4(1), 50-62.
  7. Angbazo, L. (1997). Commercial bank net interest margins, default risk, interest-rate risk, and off-balance sheet banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(1), 55-87.
  8. Anjom, W., & Karim, A. M. (2016). Relationship between non-performing loans and macroeconomic factors with bank specific factors: a case study on loan portfolios–SAARC countries perspective. ELK Asia Pacific Journal of Finance and Risk Management, 7(2), 1-29.
  9. Baltagi, B. H., & Moscone, F. (2010). Health care expenditure and income in the OECD reconsidered: Evidence from panel data. Economic modelling, 27(4), 804-811.
  10. Boudriga, A., Boulila Taktak, N., & Jellouli, S. (2009). Banking supervision and nonperforming loans: a cross-country analysis. Journal of financial economic policy, 1(4), 286-318.
  11. Bhatti, M. (2011).
  12. Mudaraba, Musharaka, Murabaha-New Terms to Bank on: A Basic Knowledge of Islamic Banking and Finance Has