Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

AN EVALUATION OF PERSONAL INCOME TAX REFORMS IN OECD COUNTRIES AFTER 1980

OECD ÜLKELERİNDE 1980 SONRASI GELİR VERGİSİ REFORMLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
143–176
Publication Date
2010-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nonetheless, among these tax models, DIT has gained the most admission.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this article was to analyze the reforms for discrete types of the income taxes applied in the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The ideal taxation form in the OECD countries is the Comprehensive Income Taxation model (CIT) where all types of incomes are implemented based on a common rate schedule.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nonetheless, among these tax models, DIT has gained the most admission.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kapsamlı Gelir Vergisi · İkili Gelir Vergisi · Tek Vergi

Abstract

The aim of this article was to analyze the reforms for discrete types of the income taxes applied in the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries. The ideal taxation form in the OECD countries is the Comprehensive Income Taxation model (CIT) where all types of incomes are implemented based on a common rate schedule. Nevertheless, no OECD country has fully implemented CIT model in the strict sense in practice. Instead, an alternative taxation model emerged beginning of the 1990s in the Scandinavian countries, in which a Dual Income Taxation (DIT) has been executed. In DIT model, all types of capital incomes are taxed at a uniform low or proportional tax rate while labor incomes subject to a progressive tax rate schedule. In more recent years, the accomplishment of flat rate tax proposals and abrogating special tax concessions excluding certain fundamental exceptions have received much attention on the political agenda. Nonetheless, among these tax models, DIT has gained the most admission.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı OECD üyesi ülkelerdeki farklı türdeki gelir vergisi reformlarını analiz etmektir. OECD ülkelerinde ideal vergileme modeli, bütün gelir türlerinin genel bir tarifeye göre vergilendirildiği Kapsamlı Gelir Vergisi modelidir. Ancak gerçekte birçok ülkede tam anlamıyla uygulanamamaktadır. Bunun yerine İskandinav ülkeleri 1990’ların başlarında sermaye gelirlerini düz ya da düşük bir orana, emek gelirlerini ise artan oranlı tarifeye tabi tutan İkili Gelir Vergisi modeline geçmiştir. Çok daha yakın dönemlerde ise vergi tarifesinin tek bir orana düşürülmesini ve temel bazı istisnalar hariç özel vergi ayrıcalıklarının ortadan kaldırılmasını öneren Tek Vergi politika zemininde çok geniş bir yankı bulmuştur. Ancak bunlar içerisinde en çok kabul gören İkili Gelir Vergisi sistemidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİKKAYA, A. (2010). AN EVALUATION OF PERSONAL INCOME TAX REFORMS IN OECD COUNTRIES AFTER 1980. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 143–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/230785

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Altshuler Rosanne (2009)., “Lessons From the Study of Taxes and the Behavıor of us Multınatıonal Corporatıons”, Tax Policy Conference 2009 - Papers and Abstracts, http://www.victoria.ac.nz/sacl/cagtr/tax-policy- 2009-abstracts.aspx. Erişim: 08/03/2010.
  2. Bahl Roy W. and Richard M. Bird (2008). “Tax Policy in Developing Countries: Looking Back and Forward”, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronta, Institute for International Business, Working Paper Series, IIB Paper No. 13. Bird Richard M. and Eric M. Zolt, (2008). “Dual Income Taxation: A Potentially Promising Approach to Tax Reform in Developing Countries”, Draft: October 28, 2008, http://aysps.gsu.edu/ISP_BirdRichard_111108.pdf, Erişim: 19/02/2010. Boadway Robin, (2005). “Income Tax Reform for a Globalized World: The Case for a Dual Income Tax”, Journal of Asian Economics, 16(2005), 910-927.
  3. Bovenberg Lans, Sıjbren Cnossen and Ruud De Mooıj, (2003). “Introduction: Tax Coordination in the European Union”, International Tax And Public Finance, 10, 619–624. Cnossen Sjbren and Lans Bovenberg, (1999). “Fundamental Tax Reform in Nederlands”, International Tax and Public Finance, 7, 471- 478. Communıcatıon, (1999). “Fundamental Tax Reform ın the Unıted States”, De Economicst, 147, No. 2. Creedy John, (2009). “The Personal Income Tax Structure: Theory and Policy”, Tax Policy Conference - Papers and Abstracts, http://www.victoria.ac.nz/sacl/cagtr/tax-policy-2009-abstracts.aspx Erişim 08/03/2010.
  4. Edizdoğan Nihat, Ali Çelikkaya, (2010). “Vergilerin Ekonomik Analizi”, Dora Yayıncılık, Bursa. Eggert Wolfgang And Bernd Genser, (2005). “Dual Income Taxatıon ın EU Member Countries”, Cesifo DICE Report, 41-47. European Commission, (2009). Taxation trends in the European Union, Main results. Ganghof Steffen, (2004). “Globalization and the Dilemmas of Income Taxation in Australia”, Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol, 39, No. 3, pp. 519-534, November. Ganghof Steffen, (2005). “Globalization, Tax Reform Ideals and Social Policy Financing”, Global Social Policy, 5: 77-95. Ganghof Steffen, (2006). “Tax mixes and the size of the welfare state: causal mechanism and policy implications”, Journal of European Social Policy, Sage Publication, Vol: 16(4); 360-373. Ganghof Steffen, (2007). “The Political Economy of High Income Taxation: Capital Taxation, Path Dependence, and Political Institutions in Denmark”, Comparative Political Studies, Volume 40, Number 9, Sage Publication, September, 1059-1084. Gens