SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Otantik Liderliğin Akademik Platformda Lider Boyutu Açısından İncelenmesi

Güzin KIYIK KICIR
Didem PAŞAOĞLU
Pages
1–24
Publication Date
2014-12-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, the dean of the faculties are seen in similar and different sides in authentic leadership, and it is found that women have more tendency on authentic leadership and also social sciences deans, and science faculties of the deans answers are indicated close features of concept

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, authentic leadership approach has been questioned on deans involved in the academic platform.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Problematic of the study, what density the authentic leadership is seen in academics, how gender is reflected in behaviors come from different disciplines, and what impact attitudes and behaviors that constitute.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, the dean of the faculties are seen in similar and different sides in authentic leadership, and it is found that women have more tendency on authentic leadership and also social sciences deans, and science faculties of the deans answers are indicated close features of concept
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Otantik Liderlik · Akademik Platform · Sinerji

Abstract

In this study, authentic leadership approach has been questioned on deans involved in the academic platform. Problematic of the study, what density the authentic leadership is seen in academics, how gender is reflected in behaviors come from different disciplines, and what impact attitudes and behaviors that constitute. The purpose of the study is to examine the phenomenon of authentic leadership. The data collection method is used in-depth interviews. The faculty deans were determined by purposive sampling method. The data collected with data encoding, and Nvivo was used for analysis. As a result, the dean of the faculties are seen in similar and different sides in authentic leadership, and it is found that women have more tendency on authentic leadership and also social sciences deans, and science faculties of the deans answers are indicated close features of concept

Özet

Bu çalışmada otantik liderlik yaklaşımı akademik platformda görev alan dekanlar üzerinde sorgulanmıştır. Çalışmanın sorunsallarını otantik liderliğin akademisyenlerde görülme yoğunluğunun ne olduğu, cinsiyetin otantik liderlik davranışlarına nasıl yansıdığı ve farklı disiplinlerden gelmenin tutum ve davranışları ne yönde etkilediği oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın amacı görüşülen katılımcılar üzerinde otantik liderlik olgusunu durum saptamasıyla incelemektir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak derinlemesine görüşme metodu kullanılmaktadır. Toplanan veriler ise geliştirilen veri kodlama cetveli yardımıyla, N-vivo programından destek alınarak içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Sonuç olarak fakülte dekanlarının her birinin otantik liderlikle kesişen ve farklılaşan yanlara sahip ve kadınların otantik liderliğe daha yatkın olduğuna ulaşılırken, sosyal bilimlere oranla, fen ve doğa bilimlerine ait fakültelerde görev alan dekanların cevaplarının kavrama daha yakın özellikler gösterdiği dikkati çekmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

KICIR, G. K., PAŞAOĞLU, D. (2014). Otantik Liderliğin Akademik Platformda Lider Boyutu Açısından İncelenmesi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 1–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/230523

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aquino, K. & Reed, A., II (2002). “The Self-Importance of Moral Identity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.
  2. Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full Leadership Development: Building The Vital Forces in Organizations. Thou- sand Oaks, CA7 Sage. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F. & May, D. R. (2004). “Unlocking The Mask: A Look at The Process by Which Authentic Leaders Impact Follower Attitudes and Be- haviors”, The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823.
  3. Avolio, B. J. & Gardner, W. L. (2005). “Authentic Leadership Development: Getting to The Root of Positive Forms of Leadership”, The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.
  4. Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O. & Weber, T. J. (2009). “Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions”, Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 421–449.
  5. Boatwright, K. J. & Forrest, L. K. (2000) “The influence of gender and needs for connection on workers' ideal preferences for leadership behaviors”. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7, 18-34.
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Good Business. Leadership, flow and the making of meaning. Lon- don: Coronet Books, Hodder & Stoughton eds. Colby, A. & Damon, W. (1992). Some Do Care: Contemporary Lives of Moral Commitment. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  7. Dorn, F., Buckley, M. R. & Brown, J. A. (2005). Barnard on Conflicts of Responsibility Implications for Today's Perspectives on Transformational and Authentic Leadership. Management Deci- sion, 43, ss.1396-1409.
  8. Ersoy, E. (2009). Cinsiyet Kültürü İçerisinde Kadın ve Erkek Kimliği (Malatya Örneği), Fırat Üniversi- tesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt:19, Sayı:2, Sayfa: 209-230,
  9. Elazığ. Galperin, B., Bennett, R. & Aquino, K. (2011). “Status Differentiation and The Protean Self: A So- cial-Cognitive Model of Unethical Behavior in Organizations.” Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 407–424.
  10. Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R. & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can You See The Real Me?:” A Self-Based Model of Authentic Leader and Follower Development. The Leaders- hip Quarterly, 16(3), 343–372.
  11. George, B. (2003). Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering The Secrets to Creating Lasting Value. San Francisco, CA7 Jossey-Bass. George, W. & Sims, P. (2007). True North: Discover Your Authentic Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Goffee, R. & G. Jones. (2005). “Managing Authenticity: The Paradox of Great Leaders”, Harvard Business Review, 83:12, s.86-94.
  12. Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. C.R. Snyder ve S. Lopez