SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Why do States Transfer Their Sovereignity? Hierarchy Approach

Devletler Egemenliklerini Neden Transfer Eder? Hiyerarşi Yaklaşımı

Hüsna TAŞ YETİM
Pages
397–420
Publication Date
2020-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, this study will form some hypotheses regarding the answer to this question as a result of the readings on the hierarchy approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract This paper aims to explain why states transfer their sovereignty to an authority other than themselves employing hierarchy approach that has become popular in international relations literature in the post-2010 period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Why a state challenges the state under its authority to increase autonomy cannot be understood without explaining the reasons behind this state's transfer of sovereignty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, this study will form some hypotheses regarding the answer to this question as a result of the readings on the hierarchy approach.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İkincil Devlet · Hegememonik Güç · Otonomi Transferi

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to explain why states transfer their sovereignty to an authority other than themselves employing hierarchy approach that has become popular in international relations literature in the post-2010 period. Addressing this issue is important for two reasons: The first is to make clearer the reasons behind the recent challenges to American hegemony. Why a state challenges the state under its authority to increase autonomy cannot be understood without explaining the reasons behind this state's transfer of sovereignty. Second, although the number of hierarchy texts that put forward the answer to the question “why does a state transfer autonomy” are numerous, systematic studies are needed. In this context, this study will form some hypotheses regarding the answer to this question as a result of the readings on the hierarchy approach.

Özet

Bu çalışma, devletlerin egemenliklerini neden kendilerinden başka bir otoriteye devrettiklerini 2010 sonrası dönemde uluslararası ilişkiler literatüründe popüler hale gelen hiyerarşi yaklaşımıyla açıklamayı hedeflemektedir. Bu konuyu ele almak iki nedenden ötürü önemlidir: Birincisi, son dönemlerde Amerikan hegemonyasına karşı ortaya çıkan meydan okumaların nedenlerini daha anlaşılır kılmaktır. Bir devletin otonomi arttırmak için otoritesi altında bulunduğu devlete neden meydan okuduğu bu devletin egemenliğini transfer etmesinin arkasındaki nedenler açıklanmadan anlaşılamaz. İkincisi, “bir devlet otonomisini neden devreder” sorusunun yanıtını ortaya koyan hiyerarşi metinleri sayıca fazla olmasına karşın, sistematik çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır. Bu bağlamda bu çalışma hiyerarşi yaklaşımına dair yapılan okumalar sonucu bu sorunun yanıtına dair bazı hipotezler oluşturacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YETİM, H. T. (2020). Why do States Transfer Their Sovereignity? Hierarchy Approach. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 397–420. https://ajindex.com/articles/230475

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Balcı, A. (2019). When Hierarchy Shattered: Turkey’s post-2013 Crisis with the US-led Order. TUBITAK, Program Code: 1002, Project No: 118K413, August. Barder, A. (2015). Empire Within: International Hierarchy and its Imperial Laboratories of Governance. New York: Routledge. Barnathan, G. P. (2012). “Western Europe, NATO, and The United States: Leash Slipping, Not Leash Cutting”, (eds.), Kristen W., Steven L., and Neal J., Beyond Great Powers and Hegemons: Why Secondary States Support, Follow, or Challenge. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 112-27.
  2. Barnett, M. N. (1990). “High Politics Is Low Polıtıcs the Domestic and Systemic Sources of Israeli Security Policy: 1967-1977”. World Politics. 42: 529-62.
  3. Barnett, M. N. (2001). ”Authority, Intervention and the Outer Limits of International Relations Theory”. (eds.), Thomas C., Ronald K., and Robert L., Intervention and Transnationalism in Africa Global–Local Networks of Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47-69.
  4. Barnett, M. N. ve Levy, J. S. (1991). “Domestic Sources of Alliences and Alignments: The Case f Egypt 1962-1973”. International Organization. 45 (3): 369-95.
  5. Barnett, M. ve Raymond D. (2005). “Power in International Politics”. International Organization. 59 (1): 39-75.
  6. Clapton, W. ve Shahar H. (2012). “The Domestic Politics of International Hierarchy: Risk Management and the Reconstitution of International Society”. International Politics. 49: 59-79.
  7. Clark, I. (1989). The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Clark, I. (2009). “Bringing hegemony back in: the United States and International Order”. International Affairs. 85(1): 23-36.
  9. Clark, I. (2011). Hegemony in International Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Colgan, J. D. ve Nicolas L. M. (2018). “Rival Hierarchies and the Origins of Nuclear Technology Sharing”. SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.3250854, (Erişim Tarihi: 06.06.2020).
  11. Cooley, A. (2003). “Thinking Rationally about Hierarchy and Global Governance”. Review of International Political Economy. 10 (4): 672-84.
  12. Cooley, A. (2005). Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, States, and Military Occupation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  13. Cooley, A. (2017). Command or Control?: Hierarchy and International Politics of Foreign Military Bases”. (ed.), Ayşe Z., Hierarchies in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 154-75.
  14. Cooley, A. ve Hendrik S. (2009). Contracting Stat