Journals / Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar / 2011 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Human Factor in Therapeutic Relationship

Terapötik İlişkide İnsan Faktörü

Pages
117–141
Publication Date
2011-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review is focused on the reflection of some therapeutic factors resulting from being human and development of counter transference onto the therapeutic process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Therapeutic relationship is a professional relationship that has been structured based on theoretical props.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This relationship is a complicated, wide and unique relationship which develops between two people, where both sides\' personality and attitudes inevitably interfere.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review is focused on the reflection of some therapeutic factors resulting from being human and development of counter transference onto the therapeutic process.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:terapötik ilişki · psikoterapi · psikolojik danışma

Abstract

Therapeutic relationship is a professional relationship that has been structured based on theoretical props. This relationship is a complicated, wide and unique relationship which develops between two people, where both sides\' personality and attitudes inevitably interfere. Therapist-client relationship experienced through transference and counter transference, especially in psychodynamic approaches, is accepted as the main aspect of therapeutic process. However, the approaches without dynamic/deterministic tendency also take therapist-client relationship into account seriously and stress uniqueness of interaction between two people. Being a person and a human naturally sometimes may negatively influence the relationship between the therapist and client and result in a relationship going out of the theoretical frame at times. As effective components of a therapeutic process, the factors that stem from being human include the unique personalities of the therapist and the client, their values and their attitude either made consciously or subconsciously. Literature has shown that the human-related factors are too effective to be denied in therapeutic relationship process. Ethical and theoretical knowledge can be inefficient to prevent the negative effects of these factors in therapeutic process at which point a deep insight and supervision would have a critical role in continuing an acceptable therapeutic relationship. This review is focused on the reflection of some therapeutic factors resulting from being human and development of counter transference onto the therapeutic process.

Özet

Terapötik ilişki kuramsal dayanaklar doğrultusunda yapılandırılmış, profesyonel bir ilişkidir. Bu ilişki aynı zamanda, iki insan arasında gelişen ve her iki tarafın kişiliklerinin ve tutumlarının kaçınılmaz bir biçimde etkili olduğu bir etkileşimi içeren kapsamlı, karmaşık ve özgün bir ilişkidir. Aktarım ve karşı aktarım yoluyla ortaya çıkan terapist-danışan etkileşimi özellikle psikanalitik yönelimli yaklaşımlarda terapötik sürecin ana unsuru olarak ele alınmaktadır. Dinamik yönelimli olmayan yaklaşımlar da terapist-danışan etkileşimine özel bir önem vermekte ve bu ilişkinin aynı zamanda iki insanın etkileşimi olduğunu vurgulamaktadırlar. Terapötik ilişkide terapist ve danışanın insan olmalarından kaynaklanan ve zaman zaman kuramsal çerçevenin dışına çıkılmasına yol açan çeşitli karıştırıcı faktörler bulunmaktadır. Terapötik süreçte etkili olduğu kabul edilmesine karşın, tümüyle kontrol edilmesi mümkün olmayan "insan olmaktan" kaynaklanan faktörler terapist ve danışanın kendi özgün kişilikleri, değerleri ve terapötik süreçte bilinçli veya bilinçsiz olarak sergiledikleri tutumları kapsar. Yapılan çalışmalar insan olmaktan kaynaklanan faktörlerin, terapötik ilişki sürecinde göz ardı edilemeyecek ölçüde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu faktörlerin terapötik sürece olumsuz yansımalarını engellemek için etik ve kuramsal bilgi yetersiz kalabilmektedir. Bu noktada derin bir içgörü ve süpervizyon kritik bir işleve sahiptir. Bu gözden geçirme yazısı insan olmaktan kaynaklanan ve özellikle karşı aktarımın gelişmesine zemin hazırlayan bazı faktörlerin terapötik sürece yansımalarına odaklanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akdoğan, R., Ceyhan, E. (2011). Human Factor in Therapeutic Relationship. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 117–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/230158

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Corsini JC, Wedding D. Current Psychotherapies, 4th Ed.Illinois, F.E. Peacock Publishers, 1986.
  2. Gelso CJ, Carter JA. Components of the psychotherapy relationship: their interaction and unfolding during treatment. J Couns Psychol 1994; 41:296-306.
  3. Patterson E, Welfel ER. The Counseling Process, 5th Ed. Canada, Brooks Cole Publishing, 2000. Xiangyi C. An exploratory study of Chinese psychotherapists' understanding and experiences of professional relationship in Mainland China (Ph.D. Thesis). Hong Kong, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2009.
  4. Heid LS, Parish MT. The nature of self-integrated authenticity in counselors and therapists. 6th proceedings of the international conference on counseling in the 21st century, May 29-30 1997.
  5. Beijing, China. Weishaar DL. The therapist’s experience of feeling in too deep with a client: a phenomenological exploration (Ph.D Thesis). Georgia, USA, Georgia State University, 2007. Gelderman WA. A study of transference in the male to male counseling relationship (M.S. Thesis). Canada, St. Stephen's College, 1998. Tellides C. The manifestation of transferans in the formation of the therapeutic relationship (Ph D. Thesis). Montreal, McGill University, 2006.
  6. Beutler LE, Sandowicz M. The counseling relationship: what is this? The Counseling Psychology 1994; 22:98-103. Tura SM. Günümüzde Psikoterapi. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2000. Wolstein B. The analysis of transference as an interpersonal process. Am J Psychother 1996; 504:499-509. Corey G. Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 5th Ed. USA: Brooks-Cole Publishing Company, 1996.
  7. Gelso CJ, Mohr JJ. The working alliance and the transference/countertransference relationship: their manifestation with racial/ethnic and sexual orientation minority clients and therapists. Appl Prev Psychol 2001; 10:51-68.
  8. Markos PA, Kottler JA. A humanist and a behaviorist come to terms with the human dimensions of helping. Guidance and Counseling 1995; 11:29-31. Scaturo DJ. Technical skill and the therapeutic relationship: a fundamental dilemma in cognitive-behavioral and insight-oriented therapy. Fam Ther 2002; 291: 1-21.
  9. Cooley EJ, Lajoy R. Therapeutic relationship and improvement as perceived by clients and therapists. J Clin Psychol 1980; 36:562-570.
  10. Meier ST, Davis SR. Psikolojik Danışma; Temel Öğeler (Çev. Ed. Doğan S.), 1. Basım. Ankara, Pegema Yayıncılık, 2006.
  11. Lichtenberg JW, Moberly RL, Wettersten KB, Corey AE, Merkley KB, Mull H. Relational control and relationship quality