Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2006 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Long-term outcomes of phacoemulsification and IOL implantation without capsuler tension ring in traumatic cataract with zonular damage

Zonül hasarı bulunan travmatik kataraktta kapsül germe halkası olmaksızın fakoemülsifikasyon ve göz içi mercek implantasyonu: Uzun dönem sonuçlarımız

Pages
13–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In the long-term, eyes having traumatic cataract with zonuler damage up to one quadrant posterior chamber hydrophilic acrylic IOL with PMMA haptic implantation without CTR was found as anatomically and functionally applicable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the long-term results of phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intra ocular lens (IOL) implantation without capsuler tension ring (CTR) in traumatic cataract with zonuler damage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Fifteen eyes of 15 cases (10 male, 5 female) having traumatic cataract and zonuler damage up to one quadrant were evaluated in this retrospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In the long-term, eyes having traumatic cataract with zonuler damage up to one quadrant posterior chamber hydrophilic acrylic IOL with PMMA haptic implantation without CTR was found as anatomically and functionally applicable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fakoemülsifikasyon · Katarakt · Geriyedönük çalışma

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term results of phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intra ocular lens (IOL) implantation without capsuler tension ring (CTR) in traumatic cataract with zonuler damage. Materials and Methods: Fifteen eyes of 15 cases (10 male, 5 female) having traumatic cataract and zonuler damage up to one quadrant were evaluated in this retrospective study. Phacoemulsification and posterior chamber IOL without CTR was performed in all cases. Eleven cases (73%) had non perforating eye trauma and 4 cases (27%) had perforating eye injury history. Intraoperative IOL stabilization were enough and CTR was not used. In all cases, hydrophilic acrylic IOL with PMMA haptic were implanted. In 6 eyes (40%) phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy were performed in the same session. Results: The mean age was 46 years (range 27 to 59). Preoperatively, 2 cases (13%) had intraocular foreign body, 3 cases (20%) had iridodyalisis, 1 case (7%) had retinal detachment, 5 cases (33%) had vitreous hemorrhage, 5 cases (33%) had elevated intraocular pressure, 1 case (7%) had glaucoma history. The median time between trauma and surgery was 4.8 months (range 1 to 240 months). The mean follow up time was 15.7 months (range 8-22 months). After surgery, in all cases except one IOL was stable and intraocular pressure was within normal limits. Visual acuity improved in 12 cases whereas did not improve in 3 cases due to the posterior segment pathology. Conclusion: In the long-term, eyes having traumatic cataract with zonuler damage up to one quadrant posterior chamber hydrophilic acrylic IOL with PMMA haptic implantation without CTR was found as anatomically and functionally applicable.

Özet

Amaç: Travmaya bağlı katarakt ve zonül hasarı olan gözlerde kapsül germe halkası (KGH) olmaksızın fakoemülsifikasyon ve arka kamara göziçi merceği (GİM) uygulanan olguların uzun dönem sonuçlarını değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Travmaya bağlı bir kadrana kadar zonül hasarı ve kataraktı olan, KGH olmaksızın fakoemülsifikasyon-GİM uygulanan 15 olgunun (10 erkek, 5 kadın) 15 gözü geriye dönük değerlendirildi. On bir olguda (%73) künt göz travması, 4 olguda (%27) delici göz travması öyküsü vardı. Ameliyat esnasında GİM stabilizasyonu yeterli görüldüğü için KGH kullanılmadı. Olguların tümüne hidrofilik akrilik PMMA bacaklı GİM takıldı. Altı gözde (%40) fakoemüsifikasyon ile birlikte aynı seansta pars plana vitrektomi de uygulandı. Bulgular: Olguların ortalama yaşı 46 idi (27-59 yıl). Ameliyat öncesi; 2 olguda (%13) göz içi yabancı cisim, 3 olguda (%20) iridodiyaliz, 1 olguda (%7) retina dekolmanı, 5 olguda (%33) vitreiçi kanama mevcuttu. Ameliyat öncesi 5 olguda (%33) göziçi basınç yüksekliği, 1 olguda (%7) travma öncesi glokom tanısı mevcuttu. Travmadan cerrahiye kadar geçen süre medyan 4,8 aydı (1-240 ay). Olgular ortalama 15,7 ay (8-22 ay) süre ile takip edildi. Ameliyat sonrasında, tüm olgularda GİM stabil durumda ve göziçi basıncı normal sınırlardaydı (1 olgu antiglokomotöz ilaç ile). On iki olguda görme keskinliği arttı. Arka segment patolojilerine bağlı 3 olguda görme keskinliği artmadı. Sonuç: Uzun dönemde, zonül hasarı bir kadrana kadar olan travmatik kataraktlı olgularımızda KGH kullanılmadan, arka kamaraya yerleştirilen hidrofilik akrilik PMMA bacaklı GİM uygulaması anatomik ve fonksiyonel olarak uygulanabilir bir tekniktir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARDAK, Y., DEMİRKOL, A., ÇEKİÇ, O., TIĞ, U. Ş. (2006). Long-term outcomes of phacoemulsification and IOL implantation without capsuler tension ring in traumatic cataract with zonular damage. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 13–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/226714

References (15)

  1. Learning DV: Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members- 2001 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1681-1688
  2. Burkhard DH, Augustin AJ: Lens implant selection with absence of capsular support Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2001;12:47-57
  3. Price FW, Wellemeyer M: Transscleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21:567-573
  4. Bleckmann H, Kaczmarek U: Functional results of posterior chamber lens implantation with scleral fixation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:321-326
  5. Kumar M, Arora R, Sanga L, et al.: Scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation in unilateral aphakic children. Ophtalmology 1999;106:2184-2189
  6. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Jacobi FK, et al.: Scleral fixation of secondary foldable multifocal intraocular lens implants in children and young adults. Ophtalmology 2002;109:2315-2324
  7. Me Cluskey P, Harrisberg B: Long-term results using scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:34-39
  8. Şengör T, Gürdal C, Özkurt Y, ve ark.: Skleral fiksasyon arka kamara göz içi lens implantasyonlarında erken ve geç dönem kistoid maküler ödem. T Oft Gaz 1998;28:8-14
  9. Yazıcı B, Gelişken Ö, Ertürk H, ve ark.: Skleral fiksasyonlu göz içi lens implantasyonundan sonra yırtıklı retina dekolmanı. Ret-Vit 2002; 10:60-69
  10. Kır E, Özkan SB, Dayanır V, ve ark.: Sütürlü arka kamara lens implantasyonlarında sütür ekspozisyonu.T Oft Gaz 2002;32:32-36
  11. Lanzetta P, Bandello FM, Virgili G, et al: Is scleral fixation a safe procedure for intraocular lens implantation? Doc Ophtalmol 1999;97:317-324
  12. Gogate PM, Kulkarni SR, Krishnaiah S, et al.: Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification compared with manual small-incision cataract surgery by a randomized controlled clinical Trial. Ophthalmology 2005;112:869-874
  13. Lyle WA, Jin GJC: Prospective evaluation of early visual and refractive effects with small clear corneal incision for cataract surgery. J Cataract and Refractive Surg 1996;22:1456-1460
  14. Mayer E, Cadman D, Ewings P, et al.: 10 year retrospective survey of cataract surgery and endophthalmitis in a single eye unit: Injectable lenses lower the incidence of endophthalmitis. Br J of Ophthalmology 2003;87:867-869
  15. Miller JJ,Scott Ul, Flynn HW, et al.: Acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2000-2004): incidence, clinical settings, and visual acuity outcomes after treatment. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;1 39:983-987