Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The results of the zeiss-acrilisa 366 D multifocal ıntraocular lenses implantation operations with biaxial microincisional cataract surgery tehnique

Biaksiyel küçük kesili katarakt cerrahi tekniği ile zeiss-acri-lisa 366 D multifokal göz içi lenslerinin yerleştirilmesi ameliyatlarının sonuçları

Pages
17–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: When Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D intraocular lenses are implanted by using B-MICS technique, with the contribution of the advantages of this technique to avoid astigmatism, expected results from multifocal lenses can be obtained in terms of functionality, efficacy and safety.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the results of the B-MICS operation with the usage of aspheric, diffractive-refractive multifocal Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D IOLs which can be implanted through a 1.8 mm incision.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Twenty-seven eyes of the 17 patients were operated with the B-MICS technique and Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D multifocal IOLs were implanted through 1.8 mm incisions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: When Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D intraocular lenses are implanted by using B-MICS technique, with the contribution of the advantages of this technique to avoid astigmatism, expected results from multifocal lenses can be obtained in terms of functionality, efficacy and safety.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the results of the B-MICS operation with the usage of aspheric, diffractive-refractive multifocal Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D IOLs which can be implanted through a 1.8 mm incision. Materials and Methods: Twenty-seven eyes of the 17 patients were operated with the B-MICS technique and Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D multifocal IOLs were implanted through 1.8 mm incisions. The mean age of the patients was 48.6±14.2 and mean follow up time was 14.7±5.0 months. Operations were made bilaterally in 10 patients and unilaterally in 7 patients. Four eyes of 2 patients were intervened for RLE and in 2 cases, LRI were combined to the surgery. Patients were evaluated for their far, near and intermediate distance visual gains, quality of vision and SIA. Results: Patient’s postoperative mean monocular uncorrected visual acuities were for far, near and intermediate distances; 0.78±0.17, J1.15±0.46, J4.0±1.33 and best corrected visual acuities were 0.99±0.05, J1.09±0.27. J3.0±1.50 while mean binocular uncorrected visual acuities were 0.98±0.05, J1.07±0.27, J2.4±1.52 respectively. Mean contrast sensitivity measurements were 1.54±0.33, 1.62±0.28, 1.28±0.36, 0.93±0.30 without glare and 1.33±0.28, 1.53±0.29, 1.15±0.32 and 0.84±0.35 with glare for 3, 6, 12, 18 cpd respectively at the 90th postoperative day. The final measured average incision width was 1.93±0.18 mm and SIA was calculated as 0.18x90 with the vectorial analyses method. Both near and far spectacle independence rates were 100%postoperatively. Conclusion: When Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D intraocular lenses are implanted by using B-MICS technique, with the contribution of the advantages of this technique to avoid astigmatism, expected results from multifocal lenses can be obtained in terms of functionality, efficacy and safety.

Özet

Amaç: Asferik, difraktif-refraktif özellikleri olan ve 1.8 mm kesiden yerleştirilebilen multifokal, Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D göz içi lenslerinin (GİL), biaksiyel küçük kesili katarakt cerrahisi (B-KKKC) tekniği ile kullanılması sonrası alınan sonuçları irdelemek. Gereç ve Yöntem: On-yedi hastanın, 27 gözüne B-KKKC yöntemi kullanılarak 1.8 mm kesiden Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D GİL’leri yerleştirildi. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 48.6±14.2, ortalama takip süresi 14.7±5.0 aydı. On hastada iki taraflı, 7 hastada tek taraflı ameliyat yapıldı. İki hastanın dört gözünde refraktif lens değişimi yapılırken, iki gözde limbal gevşetici kesiler ameliyata ilave edildi. Hastalar uzak, yakın, ve orta mesafedeki görsel kazançları, görme kaliteleri ve cerrahi nedenli astigmatizmaları (CNA) yönüyle değerlendirildiler. Bulgular: Hastaların ameliyat sonrası elde edilen ortalama düzeltmesiz görmeleri; uzak için 0.78±0.17, yakın için J 1.15±0.46 ve ara mesafe için (60 cm) J4.0±1.33 iken en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinlikleri sırasıyla 0,99±0,05, J1.09±0.27, J3.0±1.50 olarak ölçüldü. Bilateral düzeltmesiz uzak görmeleri; 0.98±0.05, yakın görmeleri; J1.07±0.27 ve ara mesafe görmeleri J2.4±1.52 olarak bulundu. Kontrast duyarlılık değerleri 90.günde, sırası ile 3, 6, 12, 18 cpd’ler için 1.54±0.33, 1.62±0.28, 1.28±036 ve 0.93±0.30 iken, yüksek aydınlatmalı ortam (glare) kontrast duyarlılık değerleri sırası ile 1.33±0.28, 1.53±0.29, 1.15±0.32 ve 0.84±0.35 olarak saptandı. Postoperatif kesi genişliği ortalaması 1.93±0.18mm olarak ölçüldü ve CNA değeri vektör analizi yöntemi ile 0.18 D x 90º olarak hesaplandı. Ameliyatlar sonrası gerek uzak gerek yakın için gözlükten bağımsızlık oranı %100 olarak belirlendi. Sonuç: Zeiss-AcriLisa 366 D lensi B-KKKC tekniği ile yerleştirildiğinde astigmatizmadan kaçınmak anlamında tekniğin sağladığı avantajın da katkısı ile gerek işlevsel yönden gerek de güvenilirlik ve etkinlik anlamında multifokal lenslerden beklenen sonuçları sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAN, İ., Takmaz, T., SOYUGELEN, G., NACAROĞLU, Ş. A. (2009). The results of the zeiss-acrilisa 366 D multifocal ıntraocular lenses implantation operations with biaxial microincisional cataract surgery tehnique. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 17–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/226595

References (15)

  1. Alio J, Rodriguez-Pratz JL, Galal A, et al.: Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1997-2003
  2. Alio J, Rodriguez-Pratz JL, Galal A.: Advances in microincision cataract surgery intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:80-93
  3. Kelman CD.: Phaco-emulsification and aspiration; a new technique of cataract removal; a preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;64:23-35
  4. Shearing SP, Relyea RL, Louiza A et al.: Routine phacoemulsification through a one-millimeter non-sutured incision. Cataract. 1985;2:6-11
  5. Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Agarwal AT.: Phaconit and laser phaconit: Lens surgery through a.9 mm incision. In Agarwal S, et al. Phacoemulsification, laser cataract surgery and foldable IOL’s. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers. 1998;204-216
  6. Alio JL.: What does MICS require? In: Alio JL, Rodriguez Prats JL, Galal A, eds. MICS Micro-incision Cataract Surgery.Miami: Highlights of Ophthalmology. 2004:1-4
  7. Mehta KR, Mehta CK.: 0.7 Bimanual microphaco. In Garg A, Fine IH, Alio JL et al. Mastering the techniques of advanced phaco surgery. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers. 2008;143-150
  8. Morselli S, Bellucci R.: Advances in fluid dynamics of microcoaxial incision surgery. In Garg A, Fine IH, Alio JL et al. Mastering the techniques of advanced phaco surgery. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers. 2008;61-66
  9. Alio JL. El Kady B, Ortiz D, Bernabeu G.: Clinical outcomes and intraocular optical quality of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with asymmetrical light distribution. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:942-948
  10. Alio JL, El Kady B, Klonowsky P.: Acrilisa with MICS. In Goes FJ ed. Multifocal IOLs. 2008;201-209
  11. Emery JM, Little JH.: Phacoemulsification and aspiration of cataracts; Surgical techniques, complications and results. St Louis, MO, CV Mosby. 1979;45-49
  12. Can İ, Takmaz T, Genç İ.: Half-moon supracapsular nucleofractis phacoemulsification: Safety,efficacy, and functionality. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1958-1965
  13. Fine H, Packer M, Hoffman RS.: Power modulations in new phacoemulsification technology: improved outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1014-1019
  14. Crema AS, Walsh A, Yamane Y, Nose W.: Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery One year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1014-1018
  15. Can İ, Takmaz T, Nacaroğlu ŞA, Genç İ, Soyugelen G.: Bimanuel küçük kesili katarakt cerr