Journals / Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Is Intravenous Morphine Alone Sufficiently Effective for Postoperative Analgesia in Bilateral, Single-port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy Performed in the Supine Position?

Tek-port, Bilateral ve Supin Pozisyonda Uygulanan Video-Yardımlı Torakoskopik Sempatektomi Ameliyatları Sonrası İV Morfin Yeterli midir?

Pages
204–212
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In conclusion, even though an adequate analgesia is ensured through ITM in thoracoscopic sympathectomy operations realized using clips method and a single port with the patient in the supine position,we think that admiinistration of morphine using IV PCA method may provide clinically acceptable analgesic efficacy, and a regional administration may not be required in patients who will be operated with this surgical technique.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The method of operation carried out by clip application in the supine position and using a single port for thoracoscopic sympathectomy has been defined in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Files of 28 patients who underwent thoracoscopic sympathectomy between January 2017-December 2019 were retrospectively screened .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In conclusion, even though an adequate analgesia is ensured through ITM in thoracoscopic sympathectomy operations realized using clips method and a single port with the patient in the supine position,we think that admiinistration of morphine using IV PCA method may provide clinically acceptable analgesic efficacy, and a regional administration may not be required in patients who will be operated with this surgical technique.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The method of operation carried out by clip application in the supine position and using a single port for thoracoscopic sympathectomy has been defined in recent years. Since lesser tissue damage occurs with this method, lower perception of pain may be anticipated. The aim of this study is to investigate whether intravenous morphine alone provides effective postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic sympathectomy performed with clips method using a single port with the patient in the supine position. Method: Files of 28 patients who underwent thoracoscopic sympathectomy between January 2017-December 2019 were retrospectively screened . Intrathecal morphine was administered to a group at a dose of 0.6 mg in 3 mL physiologic saline (Group ITM, n=14), and the other group received IV morphine in the same doses only by the PCA method (Group PCA, n=14). Both groups received postoperative Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with IV morphine, as 1 mg bolus within 30 min-lock- in time. VAS values and postoperative IV total morphine consumption were recorded at the time of extubation and at the 6th, 24th and 48th hours postoperatively Results: Any statistically significant difference was not detected between patient groups as for demographic, and operative data. After extubation and at postoperative 6th hour, pain scores were statistically significantly lower in Group ITM than the Group PCA. Total IV morphine consumption at the postoperative 24th and 48th hours was statistically significant in the Group that did not receive ITM. In the postopoperative 48-hour follow-up, no VAS>4 value was observed in any one of the patients. Any intergroup difference was not detected as for length of hospital stay and complications associated with the method of analgesia used. Conclusion: In conclusion, even though an adequate analgesia is ensured through ITM in thoracoscopic sympathectomy operations realized using clips method and a single port with the patient in the supine position,we think that admiinistration of morphine using IV PCA method may provide clinically acceptable analgesic efficacy, and a regional administration may not be required in patients who will be operated with this surgical technique.

Özet

Amaç: Torakoskopik sempatektomi için son yıllarda, supin pozisyon ve tek port kullanılarak, klips uygulaması ile gerçekleştirilen ameliyat yöntemi tanımlanmıştır. Bu yöntemle daha az doku hasarı oluştuğundan daha az ağrı beklenebilir. Bu çalışmada tek port, supin pozisyonda ve klips yöntemiyle uygulanan Torakoskopik Sempatektomi ameliyatlarında, postoperatif analjezi için tek başına İV morfin uygulamasının yeterli olup olmadığının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmamızda Ocak 2017-Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında, bu yöntemle gerçekleştirilmiş 28 torakoskopik sempatektomi hastasının dosyaları geriye dönük olarak tarandı. Anestezi indüksiyonu sonrası 3 ml serum fizyolojik içine 0.6 mg İntratekal morfin uygulanan (Grup ITM, n=14) ve İntratekal girişim uygulanmayan (Grup HKA, n=14) hastalar olmak üzere 2 gruba ayrıldı. Her 2 gruba Hasta Kontrollü Analjezi (HKA) ile İV morfin, 1 mg bolus 30 dk. kilitli kalma süresi şeklinde postoperatif verilmiştir. Postoperatif İV morfin tüketimi ve VAS değerleri; ekstübasyonda, 6, 24 ve 48. saatlerde kaydedildi. Bulgular: Hastaların demografik ve operatif verileri açısından istatistiksel bir fark saptanmadı. Ekstübasyon sonrası ve postoperatif 6. saat ağrı skorları, ITM uygulanan hasta grubunda, HKA grubuna göre, istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı düşük bulundu. ITM uygulanmayan grupta, postoperatif ilk 24 ve 48. saatteki İV morfin tüketimleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Ameliyat sonrası 48 saatlik takipte hiçbir hastada VAS>4 gözlenmedi. Gruplar arasında hastanede kalış süresi ve analjezi yöntemine bağlı komplikasyon açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma; supin pozisyon, tek port ve klips yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilen torakoskopik sempatektomi ameliyatları sonrası ağrı yönetiminde, ITM ile yeterli bir analjezi sağlansa da, İV HKA yöntemiyle morfin uygulamasının yeterli olabileceği ve bu yöntemle ameliyat edilecek hastalarda, rejyonel bir girişimin gerekmeyebileceği kanısındayız

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞUZ, S., YAPICI, D. (2020). Is Intravenous Morphine Alone Sufficiently Effective for Postoperative Analgesia in Bilateral, Single-port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy Performed in the Supine Position?. Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 204–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/224266

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. McKenna Jr RJ, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2006;81(2): 421-6.
  2. Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Feng H, et al. Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better than thoracotomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of CardioThoracic Surgery. 2013;44(3):407-14.
  3. Bayman EO, Parekh KR, Keech J, Larson N, Vander Weg M, Brennan TJ. Preoperative patient expectations of postoperative pain are associated with moderate to severe acute pain after VATS. Pain Medicine. 2019;20(3):543-54.
  4. Rizk NP, Ghanie A, Hsu M, et al. A prospective trial comparing pain and quality of life measures after anatomic lung resection using thoracoscopy or thoracotomy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2014;98(4): 1160-6.
  5. Hashmonai M, Kopelman D. History of sympathetic surgery. Clinical Autonomic Research. 2003;13(1):i6-i9.
  6. Li X, Tu YR, Lin M, Lai FC, Chen JF, Dai ZJ. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized control trial comparing T3 and T2-4 ablation. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2008;85(5):1747-51.
  7. Chen YB, Wu Y, Yang WT, et al. Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Chinese medical journal. 2009;122(13):1525-8
  8. Kuhajda I, Djuric D, Milos K, et al. Semi-Fowler vs. lateral decubitus position for thoracoscopic sympathectomy in treatment of primary focal hyperhidrosis. Journal of thoracic disease. 2015;7(Suppl 1):S5
  9. Sugimura H, Spratt EH, Compeau CG, Kattail D, Shargall Y. Thoracoscopic sympathetic clipping for hyperhidrosis: long-term results and reversibility. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2009;137(6): 1370-8.
  10. Neustein SM, McCormick PJ. Postoperative analgesia after minimally invasive thoracoscopy: What should we do? Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien D’anesthésie. 2011;58(5):423-7.
  11. Kotemane NC, Gopinath N, Vaja R. Analgesic techniques following thoracic surgery: a survey of United Kingdom practice. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA). 2010;27(1