Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 544

The effect of marketing expenditures on business performance

Pazarlama giderlerinin işletme karlılıkları üzerindeki etkisi

Pages
95–102
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings of the study; marketing expenditures, general administration expenditures and total asset size have positive impacts on the performance of the business and it has been identified that among them the most important vari- able is the marketing expenditures

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relationship between enterprises spending on marketing and their performance has been analyzed, besides analyze of the efficiency power in comparison to other factors that affect the performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, it have been tried to analyze with panel data analyses that the net profit/loss has been taken as the performance indicator by putting the factors that effect the enterprises performance into a model, including the period between 2000-2008, 2664 observation datas of the 82 companies which have active stock in the Istanbul Stock Exchange.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings of the study; marketing expenditures, general administration expenditures and total asset size have positive impacts on the performance of the business and it has been identified that among them the most important vari- able is the marketing expenditures
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2000-2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between enterprises spending on marketing and their performance has been analyzed, besides analyze of the efficiency power in comparison to other factors that affect the performance. To this end, it have been tried to analyze with panel data analyses that the net profit/loss has been taken as the performance indicator by putting the factors that effect the enterprises performance into a model, including the period between 2000-2008, 2664 observation datas of the 82 companies which have active stock in the Istanbul Stock Exchange. According to the findings of the study; marketing expenditures, general administration expenditures and total asset size have positive impacts on the performance of the business and it has been identified that among them the most important vari- able is the marketing expenditures

Özet

Yapılan bu çalışmada, işletmelerin yaptıkları pazarlama giderleri ile işletmelerin performansları arasındaki ilişkinin ve performansı etkileyen diğer faktörlere kıyasla etkinlik gücünün incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bunun içinde, performans göstergesi net dönem karı/zararı alınarak, işletmelerin performansını etkileyen faktörleri bir model içerisine koyarak, 2000-2008 yıllarını kapsayacak biçimde, İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsasında işlem gören 82 şirketin 2664 gözlem verileri panel veri analizi ile incelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularının sonucunda; pazarlama giderlerinin, genel yönetim harcamalarının ve toplam aktif büyüklüğünün işletmelerin performansı üzerinde olumlu etkisinin olduğu ve bunların arasında da en önemli değişkenin pazarlama giderleri olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFCİ, S., DOĞANAY, M., GÜLŞEN, A. Z. (2010). The effect of marketing expenditures on business performance. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 544, 95–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/224145

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. ALTUNKAYNAK, Bülent; (2007), Sektörel Panel Veri Analizi Yaklaşımıyla Türkiye’nin AB Ülkelerine İmalat Sanayi Bakımından İhracatın Belirlenmesi, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimler Enstitüsü.Ankara.
  2. BALTAGI, Badi H.; (1995),
  3. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. England. BEARD, Donald, W. and Gregory G. DESS; (1981), “Corporate Level Strategy, Business Level Strategy and Firm Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), pp. 663-688.
  4. BOULDING, William and Richard STAELIN; (1990), “Environment, Market Share and Market Power”, Management Science, 36(10), pp. 1160-1177.
  5. BROOKSBANK, Roger, David A. KIRBY and Gillian WRIGHT; (1992), “Marketing and Company Performance: An Examination of Medium Sized Manufacturing Firms in Britian”, Small Business Economics, 4, pp. 221-236.
  6. CAPON, Noel., John FARLEY and Scott HOENİNG; (1990), “Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta Analysis”, Management Science, 36(10), pp. 1143-1159.
  7. CHAGANTİ, Rajeswararo and Fariborz DAMANPOUR; (1991), “Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure and Firm Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp. 479-491.
  8. CUI, Huimin and, Y.T. MAK; (2002), “The Relationship Between Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance in High R&D Firms”, Journal of Corporete Finance, 8, pp. 313-336.
  9. DEKIMPE, Marnik G. and Dominique M. HANSSENS; (1999), “Sustained Spending and Persistent Response: A New Look at Long Term Marketing Profitability”, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, pp. 297-412.
  10. DEKIMPE, Marnik G. and Dominique M. HANSSENS; (1995), “The Persistence of Marketing Effects on Sales”, Marketing Science, 14(1), pp. 1-21.
  11. DUTTA, Shantanu, Om NARASİMHAN and Surendra RAJİV; (1999), “Success In Hıgh Tecnology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical?”, Marketing Science, 18(4), pp. 547-568.
  12. FRAZIER, Gary and Roy D. HOWELL; (1983), “Business Definition and Performance”, Journal of Marketing, 47, pp. 59-67.
  13. GOMEZ-MEJIA, Luis. R.; (1992), “Structure and Process of Diversification Compensation Strategy and Firm Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 381-397.
  14. GREENE, William H.; (2003), Econometric Analysis,Fifth Edition,
  15. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. GUO, B., Z. WANG and Y. SHOU; (2004),
  16. Firm Size, R&D and Performance: An Empirical Analysis on Software Industry in China, International Engineering Management Conferance, pp. 613-616.
  17. GUPTA, Sunil and Valarie ZEıTHAML; (2004) Customer Metrics and Their Impact on Financial Performance, Working Paper,