In this study, presidential and parliamentary systems are analyzed in terms of political stability and it is argued that the type of the system (presidential or parliamentary) is not the decisive factor in political stability rather it depends on deeper factors such as consensus on the constitutional foundations, ideological polari- zations, social divisions, and state of the income distribution in society.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, presidential and parliamentary systems are analyzed in terms of political stability and it is argued that the type of the system (presidential or parliamentary) is not the decisive factor in political stability rather it depends on deeper factors such as consensus on the constitutional foundations, ideological polari- zations, social divisions, and state of the income distribution in society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, presidential and parliamentary systems are analyzed in terms of political stability and it is argued that the type of the system (presidential or parliamentary) is not the decisive factor in political stability rather it depends on deeper factors such as consensus on the constitutional foundations, ideological polari- zations, social divisions, and state of the income distribution in society.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, presidential and parliamentary systems are analyzed in terms of political stability and it is argued that the type of the system (presidential or parliamentary) is not the decisive factor in political stability rather it depends on deeper factors such as consensus on the constitutional foundations, ideological polari- zations, social divisions, and state of the income distribution in society.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this study, presidential and parliamentary systems are analyzed in terms of political stability and it is argued that the type of the system (presidential or parliamentary) is not the decisive factor in political stability rather it depends on deeper factors such as consensus on the constitutional foundations, ideological polari- zations, social divisions, and state of the income distribution in society.
Özet
Bu çalışmada başkanlık ve parlamenter sistemler siyasal istikrar açısından ana- liz edilmekte ve sistem türü ile istikrar arasındaki ilişkinin tayin edici olmadığı; siyasal istikrarın daha çok anayasal temeller üzerinde uzlaşma, gelir dağılımı, ideolojik kutuplaşma, toplumsal parçalanma gibi daha derin nedenlere bağlı olduğu ileri sürülmektedir.
🔖
Cite This Article
KILINÇ, Z. A. (2010). Presidential and parliamentary systems in terms of political stability. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 548, 36–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/224135
GALSTON, William A. (2004), Liberal Pluralism: The Implica- tions of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice, New York: Cambridge University Press.
GOPALAN, Sandip (2010), "Burka yasağı Fransa'yı geriletir", New York Times, 28 Ocak 2010, terc. Radikal Gazetesi, 4 Şubat 2010, erişim: 15.09.2010.
GÖZE, Ayferi (1995), İstanbul: Beta. Siyasal Düşünceler ve Yönetimler, HURWITZ, Leon (1973), “Contemporary Approaches to Politi- cal Stability”, Comparative Politics, 5(3), ss. 449-463.
JONES, Bill ve KAVANAGH, Dennis (2003), British Politics To- day, (7. Baskı), Manchester: Manchester University Press.
LINZ, Juan. J. (1994), “Presidential or Parliamentary Democ- racy: Does It Make a Difference?”, The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives Vol. 1. (Der.) Juan José Linz ve Arturo Valenzuela. Baltimore: The John Hop- kins University, ss. 3-88.
ÖZSOY, İsmail (2006), “Sovyet Sisteminin Çöküşünden Tarihî ve Evrensel Dersler”, bilig, 39, ss. 163-194.
RAWLS, John (1996), Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
SARTORI, G. (1994), “Neither Presidentialism nor Parliamen- tarism”, The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives Vol. 1. (Der.) Juan J. Linz ve Arturo Valenzuela. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University, 1994., ss. 106-118.
THE PLURALISM PROJECT (2005), “Sultaana Freeman Loses Appeal to Wear Headscarf in Driver's License Photo (Florida)”, (http://pluralism.org/news/view/11549, erişim: 15.09.2010.