SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

LIABILITY IN THE CANCELLATION AND LONG DELAY OF FLIGHT CAUSED BY “EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES”

UÇUŞUN İPTALİNE VE UZUN GECİKMESİNE SEBEBİYET VEREN “OLAĞANÜSTÜ HALLER”DE SORUMLULUKTAN KURTULMA

İLKNUR SERDAR
Pages
233–304
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, in this study, the exclusion from liability of air carrier inthe event of cancellation or long delay of flight caused by the extraordinarycircumstances will be examined within the Regulation Rights of the Passengersby Air, the Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 and Decisions of the CJEU.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Regarding European Union, Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 regulates theminimum rights of an air passenger in the event of denied boarding,cancellation or long delay of flights.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Article 5/3 of the Regulation (EC) No261/2004 enacts that air carrier can be excluded from civil liability, if it canprove that the flight is cancelled caused by extraordinary circumstances whichcould not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.Article 5/3 of the Regulation has been criticized by many people including theactors in the airline industry and lawyers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, in this study, the exclusion from liability of air carrier inthe event of cancellation or long delay of flight caused by the extraordinarycircumstances will be examined within the Regulation Rights of the Passengersby Air, the Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 and Decisions of the CJEU.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Havayolu yolcusunun hakları · uçuşun uzun gecikmesi · uçuşun iptali

Abstract

Regarding European Union, Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 regulates theminimum rights of an air passenger in the event of denied boarding,cancellation or long delay of flights. Article 5/3 of the Regulation (EC) No261/2004 enacts that air carrier can be excluded from civil liability, if it canprove that the flight is cancelled caused by extraordinary circumstances whichcould not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.Article 5/3 of the Regulation has been criticized by many people including theactors in the airline industry and lawyers. In the meaning of Article 5/3 of theRegulation (EC), the concepts of “extraordinary circumstances” and “allreasonable measures” has caused some problems in practice. Court of Justiceof the European Union (CJEU) takes in charge as the final interpretationauthority in terms of the Regulation. The CJEU interpreted the concepts of“extraordinary circumstances” and “all reasonable measures” in many cases.In Turkey air passenger rights have been also regulated by the RegulationRights of the Passengers by Air on the basis of the Regulation (EC) No261/2004. Therefore, in this study, the exclusion from liability of air carrier inthe event of cancellation or long delay of flight caused by the extraordinarycircumstances will be examined within the Regulation Rights of the Passengersby Air, the Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 and Decisions of the CJEU.

Özet

261/2004 sayılı Tüzük, Avrupa Birliği (AB) bakımından, uçağa kabul

🔖

Cite This Article

SERDAR, İ. (2019). LIABILITY IN THE CANCELLATION AND LONG DELAY OF FLIGHT CAUSED BY “EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 233–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/221641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Akkurt, Sinan Sami: Sivil Havayolu ile Yolcu Taşımacılığından Kaynaklanan Hukuki Sorumluluk, Ankara 2018.
  2. Bal, Ali: Uluslararası Hava Hukuku, Ankara 2019.
  3. Bartlik, Martin: Der “aussergewöhnliche Umstand” nach dem Urteil des EuropäischenGerichtshofs in der Rechtssache Wallentin-Herrmann gegen Alitalia, RRa 6/2009, s. 272-278.
  4. Blankenburg, Daniel:10 Jahre Art. 5 Abs. 3 VO (EG) Nr. 261/2004- bisherige und aktuelle Probleme im Rahmen der aussergewöhnlichen Umstände, RRa 4/2015, s. 162-176.
  5. Boehe, Markus: Streikbedingte Umorganisation des Flugplans als aussergewöhnlicher Umstand i.S.d. Art. 5 Abs. 3 der Fluggastrechte- Verordnung!?, RRa 5/2017, s. 210-216.
  6. Bosch, Andreas/Lorz, Sigrid: Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Rechtsprechung zu Umfang und Grenzen der Haftung von Fluggesellschaften im Rahmen der Fluggastrechteverordnung, NZV 2013, s. 105-111.
  7. Cengiz, Ali: Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye’de Slot (Sıra/Zaman) Tahsisi Uygulaması ve Hukuki Değerlendirme, DEÜHFD, C. 12, Özel Sayı (Burhan Ceyhan’a Armağan) 2010 (Basım Yılı 2012).
  8. Dettling-Ott, Regula/Hochstrasser, Michael: Vogelschlag als “aussergewöhnlicher Umstand”im Sinne der Verordnung (EG) Nr.261/2004, SVLR-Bulletin 149/2017, s. 58-71.
  9. Ebinger, Christoph: Zivilrechtliche Haftung des Luftfrachtführers im Personentransport-unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Beförderung von Personen durch ferngesteuerte Luftfahrzeuge, Zürich 2012.
  10. Eren, Fikret: Sorumluluk Hukuku Açısından Uygun İlliyet Bağı Teorisi, Ankara 1975.
  11. Flöthmann, Marc: EuGH Verbraucherschutz: Ausgleichszahlungen nach Flugausfall trotzt “wilden Streiks” des Flugpersonal, EuZW 2018, s. 460-461.
  12. Führich, Ernst: Die Fluggastrechte der VO (EG) Nr.261/2004 in der Praxis, MDR 7/2007, s. 6 (MDR 7/2007).
  13. Führich, Ernst: Innerbetrieblicher “wilder Streik” als aussergewöhnlicher Umstand der Fluggastrechte-Verordnung, MDR 13/2018, 769-772.
  14. Gümüş, Mustafa Alper: Borçlar Özel Hukuku Özel Hükümler C. II, İstanbul 2012.
  15. Günel, Reşat Volkan: Uluslararası Havacılık Hukuku, İstanbul 2010.
  16. Gürpınar, Damla: Eser Sözleşmesinde Ücretin Artırılması ve Eksiltilmesi, İzmir 2006.
  17. Heinrich, Ulrike: Verbrauchervertragsrecht der Europäischen Union, Zürich, 2017.
  18. Hempel, Heinrich: Passagierrechte und Rechtsstaat: Einige grundsätzliche Gedanken zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 261/2004 und zu ihrer Anwendung aus verfassungsrechtlicher Perspektive, SVLR-Bulletin 144/2012, s. 36- 59. Hoffmann, Henning/Scheu, Rebeca-Sophia: Fluggastrechte auf dem Prüfstand, VuR 2015, s. 369-377.
  19. Hoffmann-Grambow, J