SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

EMPLOYER BRAND PERCEPTION OF EXISTING AND POTENTIAL EMPLOYEES IN SHIPYARD ENTERPRISES

TERSANE İŞLETMELERİNDE MEVCUT VE POTANSİYEL ÇALIŞANLARIN İŞVEREN MARKA ALGISI

Onur SAYLAN
Umut EROĞLU
Pages
219–236
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, it was seen that the participants perceive the employer brand in two dimensions and attach more importance to the workplace practices than the reputation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recruiting and retaining talented employees is a critical issue in the shipyards enterprises, which is a labor-intensive industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A survey was conducted with a total of 313 people.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, it was seen that the participants perceive the employer brand in two dimensions and attach more importance to the workplace practices than the reputation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İşveren Markası · Çalışan Değer Önermesi · Tersane

Abstract

Recruiting and retaining talented employees is a critical issue in the shipyards enterprises, which is a labor-intensive industry. The most important tool to achieve this is the use of employer branding practices in human resources management. In order for employer branding practices to be carried out effectively, firstly, the expectations of current and potential employees should be learned, then a suitable value proposition should be presented and the promises made in the proposal should be fulfilled. With this study, it has been tried to determine the expectations of current and potential employees in the shipbuilding sector from their employers. A survey was conducted with a total of 313 people. According to the results of the research, it was seen that the participants perceive the employer brand in two dimensions and attach more importance to the workplace practices than the reputation. In addition, effective employer brand communication factors were determined by the study.

Özet

Emek yoğun bir sektör olan tersane işletmelerinin yönetiminde, yetenekli çalışanların işe alınması ve tutulabilmesi kritik bir konudur. Bunu sağlamanın en önemli aracı da insan kaynakları yönetiminde işveren markası uygulamalarının kullanılmasıdır. İşveren markası uygulamalarının etkin bir şekilde yapılabilmesi için mevcut ve potansiyel çalışanların beklentilerinin öğrenilmesi, buna uygun bir değer önermesi sunulması ve önermedeki vaatlerin yerine getirilmesi gerekmektedir. Yapılan çalışma ile gemi inşa sektöründe mevcut ve potansiyel çalışanların işverenlerinden beklentileri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Her iki gruptan, toplam 313 kişi ile bir anket çalışması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre katılımcıların işveren markasını iki boyutta algıladığı ve işyeri uygulamaları boyutuna itibar boyutundan daha fazla önem verdiği görülmüştür. Ayrıca, gemi inşa sektöründe etkili olan işveren marka iletişimi faktörleri yapılan çalışma ile belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYLAN, O., EROĞLU, U. (2021). EMPLOYER BRAND PERCEPTION OF EXISTING AND POTENTIAL EMPLOYEES IN SHIPYARD ENTERPRISES. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 219–236. https://ajindex.com/articles/220708

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aggerholm, H. K., Andersen, S. E. ve Thomsen, C. (2011) “Conceptualising Employer Branding in Sustainable Organisations”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(2): 105-123.
  2. Arachchige, B. J. ve Robertson, A. (2011) “Business Student Perceptions of a Preferred Employer: A Study Identifying Determinants of Employer Branding”, IUP Journal of Brand Management, 8(3):25-46.
  3. Backhaus, K. ve Tikoo, S. (2004) “Conceptualizing and Researching Employer Branding”, Career development international, 9(5): 501-517.
  4. Banerjee, P., Saini, G. K. ve Kalyanaram, G. (2020) “The Role of Brands in Recruitment: Mediating Role of Employer Brand Equity”, Asia Pacific Journal Of Human Resources, 58(2): 173-196.
  5. Barney, J. (1991) “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
  6. Barrow, S. ve Mosley, R. (2005) “The Employer Brand: Kavramın Yaratıcısından Güçlü Bir İşveren Markası Oluşturmanın Sırları”, İstanbul:
  7. Realta Danışmanlık. Baş, Türker (2011) “İşveren Markası: Yüksek Nitelikli Çalışanları Çekmenin ve Elde Tutmanın Anahtarı”, İstanbul:
  8. Optimist Yayım ve Dağıtım. Bellou, V., Chaniotakis, I., Kehagias, I. ve Rigopoulou, I. (2015) “Employer Brand of Choice: An Employee Perspective”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(6): 1201-1215.
  9. Berthon, P., Ewing, M. ve Hah, L. L. (2005) “Captivating Company: Dimensions of Attractiveness in Employer Branding”, International Journal of Advertising, 24(2): 151-172.
  10. Bhasin, J., Mushtaq, S. ve Gupta, S. (2019) “Engaging Employees Through Employer Brand: An Empirical Evidence”, Management and Labour Studies, 44(4): 417-432.
  11. Cable, D.M. ve Turban, D.B. (2003) “The Value of Organizational Reputation in the Recruitment Context: A Brand‐Equity Perspective”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(11): 2244-2266.
  12. Celani, A. ve Singh, P. (2011) “Signaling Theory And applicant Attraction Outcomes”, Personnel Review, 40(2): 222-238. Charbonnier‐Voirin, A., Poujol, J. F. ve Vignolles, A. (2017) “From Value Congruence to Employer Brand: Impact on Organizational Identification and Word of Mouth”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 34(4): 429-437.
  13. Chou, C. C. ve Chang, P. L. (2004) “Core Competence and Competitive Strategy of the Taiwan Shipbuilding Industry: A Resource-Based Approach” Maritime Policy & Management, 31(2): 125-137.
  14. Combs, J. G. ve Ketchen, Jr, D. J. (1999) “Explaining Interfirm Cooperation and Performance: Toward