Journals / Güncel Retina Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Retinal Prosthesis in the Treatment of Retinitis Pigmentosa

Retinitis Pigmentosa Tedavisinde Retinal Protez

Pages
140–149
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, approaches of retinal prosthesis research groups, results of clinical trials and latest advances in their projects will be provided.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Retinal prostheses are devices that receive environmental visual stimulus, process it and stimulate degenerated retinal area in order to produce a functionally efficient visual perception.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Indications for implantation of these devices include hereditary retinal degenerations like retinitis pigmentosa, choroideremia, rod-cone dystrophy and acquired macular diseases like geographic atrophy or fibrosis due to age related macular degeneration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, approaches of retinal prosthesis research groups, results of clinical trials and latest advances in their projects will be provided.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Retinal prostheses are devices that receive environmental visual stimulus, process it and stimulate degenerated retinal area in order to produce a functionally efficient visual perception. Indications for implantation of these devices include hereditary retinal degenerations like retinitis pigmentosa, choroideremia, rod-cone dystrophy and acquired macular diseases like geographic atrophy or fibrosis due to age related macular degeneration. Clinically applied retinal prosthesis approaches can be classified as; epiretinal, subretinal, suprachoroidal and scleral (transscleral suprachoroidal). In this paper, approaches of retinal prosthesis research groups, results of clinical trials and latest advances in their projects will be provided.

Özet

Retinal protezler, çevreden görsel uyarıyı alan ve bunu işlemden geçiren, fonksiyonel olarak etkili bir görsel cevap oluşturmak amacıyla hastalıklı retina bölgesini uyaran cihazlardır. Bu cihazların implantasyon endikasyonlarını dış retina katı dejenerasyonları oluşturmaktadır ki bunlar; retinitis pigmentosa, koroideremi, rod-kon distrofisi gibi herediter retina hastalıklar ve yaşa bağlı makula dejenerasyonuna bağlı coğrafik atrofi veya fibrozis gibi edinsel makula hastalıklarıdır. Günümüzde insanlara uygulanmış olan retinal protezlerin yaklaşımları; epiretinal, subretinal, suprakoroidal ve skleral (transskleral suprakoroidal) olarak sınıflandırılabilmektedir. Bu yazıda retinal protez konusunda klinik uygulaması olan projeler, çalışma sonuçları ve son durumları ele alınacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVEN, D., DEMİR, S. T. (2021). Retinal Prosthesis in the Treatment of Retinitis Pigmentosa. Güncel Retina Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 140–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/219693

References (8)

  1. Elmannai W, Elleithy K. Sensor-based assistive devices for visually-impaired people: current status, challenges, and future directions. Sensors 2017;17(3):565. Ayton LN, Barnes N, Dagnelie G, Fujikado T, Goetz G, Hornig R, et al. An update on retinal prostheses. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;1388-2457(19)313264. Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr. Artificial vision. Eye (Lond). 1998;12(Pt 3b):605-7.
  2. Stone JL, Barlow WE, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Milam AH. Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(11):1634-9.
  3. Humayun MS, Prince M, de Juan E Jr, Barron Y, Moskowitz M, Klock IB, et al. Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(1):143-8.
  4. Kim SY, Sadda S, Pearlman J, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Melia BM, et al. Morphometric analysis of the macula in eyes with disciform age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2002;22(4):471-7.
  5. Kim SY, Sadda S, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Melia BM, Green WR. Morphometric analysis of the macula in eyes with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2002;22(4):464-70. Gerding H. A new approach towards a minimal invasive retina implant. J Neural Eng. 2007;4(1):30-7.
  6. Dagnelie G, Keane P, Narla V, Yang L, Weiland J, Humayun M. Real and virtual mobility performance in simulated prosthetic vision. J Neural Eng. 2007;4(1):92-101. Dagnelie G. Psychophysical evaluation for visual prosthesis. Annu RevBiomed Eng. 2008; 10:339-68. Güven D. Yapay göze doğru. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol. 1998;7(3):214-21.
  7. Güven D, Weiland JD, Humayun MS. Retinal protezler. Ret-Vit 2005; 13(4):247-256. Güven D. Retinal protezler. In: Önol M, Evren Ö, Özdemir Y, Aslan Ö, Atilla H, Gürdal C ve ark. Eds. TOD. 28. Ulusal Oftalmoloji Kursu Retina: Güncel Tanı ve Tedavi, 2008;189-206. Güven D. Retinal protezler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol-Special Topics. 2009;2(2):93-8. Güven D. Retinal protezler. Ret-Vit 2010;18(4):17-23.
  8. Ghodasra DH, Chen A, Arevalo JF, Birch DG, Branham K, Coley B, et al. Worldwide Argus II implantation: recommendations to optimize patient outcomes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 May 6; 16:52. Ahuja AK,Yeoh J, Dorn JD, Caspi A, Wuyyuru V, McMahon MJ, et al. Factors Affecting Perceptual Threshold in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2013;2(4):1. Güven D, Demir M, Üke Uzun S, Ergen E, Tiryaki Demir S, Demir AG, et al. Argus II retinal prote