Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

2-Year Follow-up Results in XEN Glaucoma Implant Patients

Pages
216–220
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: XEN implant surgery is a safe and effective surgery in terms of IOP reduction and reduction in topical drug use up to 2 years postoperatively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of XEN implant surgery on postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and complications related with the surgery 2-year follow-up results in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 11 eyes of 10 patients with primary open angle glaucoma who underwent XEN implant (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) surgery were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: XEN implant surgery is a safe and effective surgery in terms of IOP reduction and reduction in topical drug use up to 2 years postoperatively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of XEN implant surgery on postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and complications related with the surgery 2-year follow-up results in our clinic. Materials and Methods: A total of 11 eyes of 10 patients with primary open angle glaucoma who underwent XEN implant (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who included in the study; 5 were female and 5 were male. The mean follow-up time was 29±2.1 months. IOP values were examined at the postoperative 1st day, 1st month, 6th month, 12th month and 24th month controls. Complete success criterion defi ned as IOP values between 6-21 mmHg without using topical antiglaucomatous medication while qualifi ed success criterion was using topical antiglaucomatous agents and having the same IOP values. Results: Seven eyes (63,6%) met the complete success criteria and In 10 eyes, it was seen that qualifi ed success criteria were met in the fi rst year. While 7 eyes (63.6%) achieved complete success in the second year controls; the number of eyes that meet the qualifi ed success criteria was again determined as 10 (90.9%). Intraoperative hemorrhage and postoperative hyphema were observed in two eyes. Anterior chamber lavage was applied to one of the eyes with hyphema. Conclusion: XEN implant surgery is a safe and effective surgery in terms of IOP reduction and reduction in topical drug use up to 2 years postoperatively.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAZ, Y., TURKOGLU, E. B., KARACA, B. O., YUCEL, I., UNAL, M. (2020). 2-Year Follow-up Results in XEN Glaucoma Implant Patients. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 216–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/216658

References (14)

  1. Kennedy JB, SooHoo JR, Kahook MY, et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: an update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2016;5:63-9
  2. Sarıcaoğlu MS. Glokomda yeni cerrahi yaklaşımlar: mikroinvaziv (minimal invaziv) Glokom Cerrahisi. Glo-Kat Dergisi 2015;10:2
  3. Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, et al. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0183142
  4. R. A. Lewis, “Ab interno approach to the subconjunctival space using a collagen glaucoma stent,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2014, 40, 8, 1301-6
  5. Kerr NM, Wang J, Barton K. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery as primary stand-alone surgery for glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;45:393-400
  6. Schlenker MB, Gulamhusein H, Conrad-Hengerer I, et al. Effi cacy, safety, and risk factors for failure of standalone Ab interno gelatin microstent implantation versus standalone trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1579-88
  7. Sheybani A, Lenzhofer M, Hohensinn M, et al. Phacoemulsifi cation combined with a new ab interno gel stent to treat open-angle glaucoma: pilot study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1905-1909
  8. Sng, C. C., Wang, J., Hau, S., et al. XEN-45 collagen implant for the treatment of uveitic glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46:339-345
  9. Galal, A., Bilgic, A., Eltanamly, et al. XEN Glaucoma implant with mitomycin C 1-year follow-up: result and complications. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017, 1-5
  10. Sheybani A, Dick B, Ahmed II K. Early clinical results of a novel ab interno gel stent for the surgical treatment of openangle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016;25 11. De Gregorio A1, Pedrotti E2, Russo L et al. Minimally invasive combined glaucoma and cataract surgery: clinical results of the smallest ab interno gel stent. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:1129-34
  11. Pérez-Torregrosa VT, Olate-Pérez Á, Cerdà-Ibáñez M et al. Combined phacoemulsification and XEN 45 surgery from temporal approach and 2 incision. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2016;91:415-21
  12. Salinas L, Chaudhary A, Guidotti J, et al. Revision of a leaking bleb with XEN gel stent replacement. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:11-3
  13. Dervenis N, Mikropoulou AM, Dervenis P, et al. Dislocation of a previously successful XEN glaucoma implant into the anterior chamber: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:148
  14. Lim R, Lim KS. XEN implant-related endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:209.