SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

PROPERTIES OF COMPLICATED CYSTS/ABCESSES IN CONVENTIONAL AND DIFFUSION-WEIGHED BREAST MRI

MEMEDE KLASİK VE DİFFÜZYON AĞIRLIKLI MANYETİK REZONANS GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE KOMPLİKE KİST-APSELERİN ÖZELLİKLERİ

Özgür SİPAHİ ESEN
Semiha CANVERENLAR
Zehra Hilal ADIBELLİ
Hülya MOLLAMEHMETOĞLU
İbrahim ATASOY
Nazif ERKAN
Pages
87–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In conclusion, in differentiating complicated cyst/abcess and malign lesions, DAG was found to be unreliable on its own.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of complicated cysts/abcesses using conventional MRI and diffusion-weighed imaging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 36 complicated cysts from 32 women with no solid lesion in their breasts were examined bu using conventional and diffusion weighed MRI .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In conclusion, in differentiating complicated cyst/abcess and malign lesions, DAG was found to be unreliable on its own.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of complicated cysts/abcesses using conventional MRI and diffusion-weighed imaging. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 36 complicated cysts from 32 women with no solid lesion in their breasts were examined bu using conventional and diffusion weighed MRI . Findings: The apparent diffusion coefficent (ADC) was measured to be 0,57±0,2 x 10-3cm2/sn. This ADC value is much smaller than benign, smaller than malign lesions. Conclusion: In conclusion, in differentiating complicated cyst/abcess and malign lesions, DAG was found to be unreliable on its own. Conventional MRI findings were also necessary for diagnosis. This was especially important for patients who are planned to undergo lumpectomy and quadrantectomy

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı komplike kist-apselerin klasik ve difüzyon ağırlıklı Manyetik Rezonans görüntüleme(MRG)de özelliklerinin belirlenmesidir. GEREÇ Ve YÖNTEM: Bu geriye dönük çalışmada memesinde solid kitle olmayan 32 kadın hastanın 36 komplike kisti klasik MR ve difüzyon ağırlıklı görüntüleme (DAG) ile incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Komplike kistlerde görünen difüzyon katsayısı (GDK) 0,57±0,2 x 10-3cm2/sn olarak saptandı. Bu ADC değeri literatürde saptanmış olan benin lezyonların ADC değerinden çok düşük, malin lezyonlardan ise düşüktür. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak komplike kist-abse ile kanser ayrımında DAG tek başına değil mutlaka klasik MR bulgularıyla birlikte yapılması gerekmektedir. Özellikle bu durumun birden fazla malin meme kitlesinin varlığının araştırıldığı meme koruyucu işlemin yapılması planlanan hastalarda önemli olduğu düşünülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

ESEN, Ö. S., CANVERENLAR, S., ADIBELLİ, Z. H., MOLLAMEHMETOĞLU, H., ATASOY, İ., ERKAN, N. (2014). PROPERTIES OF COMPLICATED CYSTS/ABCESSES IN CONVENTIONAL AND DIFFUSION-WEIGHED BREAST MRI. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 87–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/216325

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Feris MH, Janet MS, Daniel ZS. Non-palpablebreastlesions: recommendationforbiopsybased on suspicion of breastcarcinoma at mammography. Radiology 1988;167:353-8
  2. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al. Breasttumors: comparativeaccuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995; 197: 743-7
  3. Macura KJ, Ouwerker R, Jacobs MA, et al. Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics 2006; 26: 1719-34
  4. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectura and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenterstudy. Radiology 2006; 238: 42-53
  5. Szabo BK, Aspelın P, Wıberg MK, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. ActaRadiol. 2003; 44: 379-86
  6. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J MagnResonImaging 2002; 16: 172-8
  7. Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. MagnResonMedSci 2008; 1: 23-9
  8. Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, et al. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breastcancer: a clinical prospective study. J MagnResonImaging 2006; 24: 319-24
  9. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, et al. Diffusionweightedimaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J ComputAssistTomogr 2005; 29: 644-9
  10. Filippi M, Cercignane M, Inglese M, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in multiplesclerosis. Neurology 2001; 56: 304-11
  11. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, DeBruhl N, Bassett LW. InVivoDiffusion- Weighted MRI of theBreast: Potential for Lesion Characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 15:693– 704
  12. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, et al.Quantitativediffusionweighted MR imaging in thedifferentia ldiagnosis of breas tlesion. EurRadiol 2007; 17: 2646-55
  13. Luo JD, Liu YY, Zhang XL, et al. Application of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to differential diagnosis of breastdiseases. AiZheng 2007; 26(2): 168-71
  14. Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, et al. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrastenhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. American Journal of Radiology, 2011; 2011;196: 210-7