Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 575

An econometric analysis of relationship Between total and sectoral energy Consumption and economic growth in turkey

Türkiye’de toplam ve sektörel enerji tüketimi ile ekonomik büyüme ilişkisinin ekonometrik analizi

Pages
31–44
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At disaggregated levels, the results indicate the presence of a uni-directional causal relationship from GDP to energy consumptions in the transport, agriculture and cycle power plant sector (CES); but no casual relati- onship between industrial and residential energy consumption.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the casual relationship between aggregated and disagg- regated levels of energy consumption and real GDP for Turkey from 1970 to 2010.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The relationships are measured with Toda and Yamamoto Causality Test (1995) which is applied to the VARs, irrespective of whether the variables are in- tegrated at the same level or cointegrated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At disaggregated levels, the results indicate the presence of a uni-directional causal relationship from GDP to energy consumptions in the transport, agriculture and cycle power plant sector (CES); but no casual relati- onship between industrial and residential energy consumption.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper examines the casual relationship between aggregated and disagg- regated levels of energy consumption and real GDP for Turkey from 1970 to 2010. The relationships are measured with Toda and Yamamoto Causality Test (1995) which is applied to the VARs, irrespective of whether the variables are in- tegrated at the same level or cointegrated. At aggregated level, the results sug- gest the presence of uni-directional causal relationship from real GDP to total energy consumption. At disaggregated levels, the results indicate the presence of a uni-directional causal relationship from GDP to energy consumptions in the transport, agriculture and cycle power plant sector (CES); but no casual relati- onship between industrial and residential energy consumption. In addition, there is bi-directional casuality between real gdp and non energy used sector (ENRD). These findings imply that energy saving policies may not affect output in Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışmada 1970-2010 dönemi yıllık verileri ile Türkiye’de reel GSYİH ile top- lam enerji tüketimi ve sektörel enerji tüketimi arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi test edilecektir. Çalışmada kullanılan ekonometrik yöntem serilerin durağanlıklarını önemsemeyen, birbirinden farklı düzeyde durağan olan seriler arasında da ne- densellik ilişkilerinin aranabileceğini öngören Toda ve Yamamoto (1995)’dir. Am- pirik testler neticesinde elde edilen sonuçlara göre, reel GSYİH’dan toplam ener- ji tüketimine doğru tek yönlü bir nedenselliğin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sektörel bazda ise, GSYİH’dan ulaştırma, tarım ve çevrim santrali (CES) sektörlerinde- ki enerji tüketimine doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik bulunurken, sanayi ve konut enerji tüketimi ile GSYİH arasında nedensellik ilişkisine rastlanmamıştır. Reel GSYİH ile enerjinin enerji dışı amaçlarla kullanıldığı sektörler (ENRD) arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmuştur. Bu bulgulardan hareketle Türkiye’de enerji tasarrufu sağlayacak politika uygulamalarının ekonomik büyüme üzerinde olumsuz bir etki yaratmayacağı söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHBAZ, A., YANAR, R. (2013). An econometric analysis of relationship Between total and sectoral energy Consumption and economic growth in turkey. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 575, 31–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/216135

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AĞIR, H. VE KAR, M. (2010), “Türkiye’de Elektrik Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Düzeyi İlişkisi: Yatay Kesit Analizi”, Sos- yoekonomi, 2010 Özel Sayı, ss. 149-176. ALTINAY,G. AND KARAGÖL,E. “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth:Evidence from Turkey”, Energy Economics 27(2005) syf:849-856.
  2. APERGİS, N. AND PAYNE,J.E.(2009) “Energy consumption and economic growth in Central America: Evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Eco- nomics 31, pp. 211–216 AYTAÇ,D., (2010) “Enerji ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisinin Çok Değişkenli Var Yaklaşımı ile Tahmini”, Maliye Dergisi, sayı:158 BEKMEZ, S. AND BOĞA, M. (2012) “EconomicDynamics of Electricity Consumption In Turkey, Germany and Greece”, Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference, 1-3 No- vember, 2012,
  3. Warsova. CHEN, S.T., KUO, H-I., and CHEN, C.-C. (2007). “The Rela- tionship Between GDP and Electricity Consumption in 10 Asian Countries”. Energy Policy Vol: 35 Iss: 4 ss. 2611–2621
  4. CLEVELAND, C.J., COSTANZA, R. and HALL, C.A.S. and KAUFMANN, R.K., (1984). “Energy and the US economy: a biophysical perspective”. Science 225, 890–897.
  5. ÇERMİKLİ, A. Hakan ve ÖZTÜRKLER, Harun(2010). “Dünya Enerji Tüketimi: 1980–2005 Döneminde Enerji Tüketimindeki Değişim” Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Cilt 21, Sayı 74, ss. 1-22
  6. DİCKEY, D.A. and FULLER, W.A., (1981) “Likelihood Ratio Statistics For Autoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root” Econometrica 49, 1057–1072. ERDAL,G.,ERDAL H. and ESENGÜN K.(2008) “The Causality Between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Tur- key”, Energy Policiy, 36, pp. 3838-3842.
  7. GILES, J. A. and WILLIAMS, C. L. (2000a) “Export-Led Growth: A Survey of the Empirical Literature and Some Non-Causality Results (Part I)”, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 9:3. pp.261-337.
  8. GILES, J. A. and WILLIAMS, C. L. (2000b) “Export-Led Growth: A Survey of the Empirical Literature and Some Non-Causality Results (Part II)”, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 9:4. pp.445-470.
  9. GRANGER, C.W.J., (1969) “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Crossspectral Models” Econometrica 37, 424–438.
  10. GÜVENEK, B. ve ALPTEKIN V. (2010), “Enerji Tüketimi ve Büyüme İlişkisi: OECD Ülkelerine İlişkin Bir Panel Veri Analizi”. Enerji, Piyasa ve Düzenleme, Cilt:1 Sayı:2 ss.172-193
  11. HUANG, B.-N., HWANG M.J., and YANG C.W. (2008) “Causal Relationship Between Energy Consumption And GDP Growth Revisited: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach” Ecological Eco- nomic