Journals / JAREM / 2012 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Prostatektomi sonrası üriner inkontinans

Post prostatectomy ıncontinence

Journal
JAREM
Pages
96–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Herein, we evaluate post prostatectomy urinary incontinence and treatments in the light of a review of current literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Urinary incontinence after prostatectomy for malignant and/or benign prostatic diseases is one of the most serious complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Urinary inconti- nence occurs rarely after prostatectomy for benign diseases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Herein, we evaluate post prostatectomy urinary incontinence and treatments in the light of a review of current literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Urinary incontinence after prostatectomy for malignant and/or benign prostatic diseases is one of the most serious complications. Urinary inconti- nence occurs rarely after prostatectomy for benign diseases. However, it may occur more commonly after radical prostatectomy. These complications affect the patient’s quality of life. Treatment of incontinence due prostatectomy includes several methods which differ from conservative to invasive surgical procedures. Slings and artificial urethral sphincters (AUS) are used more often than other procedures. Infection ratios and erosion of urethra are less frequent in AUS than in slings. Although AUS is the standard surgical procedure for severe urinary incontinence, slings may be used for severe male incontinence after prostatectomy due to the current development in sling materials.. Herein, we evaluate post prostatectomy urinary incontinence and treatments in the light of a review of current literature.

Özet

Benign ya da malign hastalıklar için yapılan prostatektomi sonrasında inkontinans gelişmesi en korkulan komplikasyonlardandır. Benign nedenlerle prostatektomi uygulanan hastalarda post operatif üriner inkontinans nadir iken, radikal prostatektomi sonrasında daha yüksek oranlarda görülür. Bu komplikasyon, hastanın yaşam kalitesini önemli derecede etkilemektedir. Prostatektomi sonrası oluşan idrar kaçırma tedavisinde; konservatif yön- temlerden, invaziv girişimlere kadar değişen farklı yöntemler kullanılır. Sling ve artifisyel üriner sfinkter (AÜS) operasyonları bu amaçla en sık kullanılan cerrahi tedavi yöntemlerdir. Sling yöntemleri, AÜS’e göre operasyon sonrası enfeksiyon ve üretral erozyon gibi komplikasyonları açısından düşük risk taşımaktadır. Şiddetli inkontinansta AÜS, günümüzde standart tedavi seçeneği sayılsa da, erkek sling materyallerindeki gelişmeler, ciddi inkontinans vakalarında da sling yöntemlerinin öne çıkacağını göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada prostatektomi sonrası idrar kaçırma ve tedavi yöntemleri güncel bilgi- ler eşliğinde değerlendirildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, A., AKIN, Y., NUHOĞLU, B. (2012). Prostatektomi sonrası üriner inkontinans. JAREM, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 96–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/215516

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Myers RP. Male urethral sphincteric anatomy and radical prostatec- tomy. Urol Clin North Am 1991
  2. Burnett AL, Mostwin JL. In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: Relevance to continence preservation follow- ing major pelvic surgery. J Urol 1998
  3. [CrossRef] 3.Wilson LC, Gilling PJ. Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a re- view of surgical treatment options. BJU Int 2011
  4. 107 Suppl 3: 7-10. [CrossRef] 4.Leach GE, Yip CM, Donovan BJ. Post prostatectomy incontinence: the influence of bladder dysfunction. J Urol 1987
  5. Tomaschi W, Suster G, Holtl W. Bladder neck strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy: Still an unsolved problem. Br J Urol 1998
  6. [CrossRef] 6.Carlson KV, Nitti VW. Prevention and management of incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin N Amer 2001
  7. [CrossRef] 7.Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, Johansson E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Nyberg T, et al. Age at surgery, educational level and long-term urinary inconti- nence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2011
  8. [CrossRef] 8.Loeb S, Smith ND, Roehl KA, Catalona WJ. Intermediate-term po- tency, continence, and survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy for clinically high-risk or locally advanced prostate cancer. Urology 2007
  9. [CrossRef] 9.Paparel P, Soulie M, Mongiat-Artus P, Cornud F, Borgogno C. Sal- vage radical prostatectomy after external radiotherapy for prostate cancer: indications, morbidity and results. Review from CCAFU pros- tate section. Prog Urol 2010
  10. [CrossRef] 10.Hu K, Wallner K. Urinary incontinence in patients who have a TURP/ TUIP following prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998
  11. [CrossRef] 11. O’Donnell PD, Finan BF. Continence following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1989
  12. Steiner MS, Morton RA, Walsh PC. Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. J Urol 1991
  13. Erdogru T, Yucel S, Frede T, Baykara M, Rassweiler J, Teber D. Lapa- roscopic radical prostatectomy: transfer validity. Int J Urol 2010
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Minniti D, Chiadò Piat S, Di Novi C. Robot-assisted versus open radi- cal prostatectomy: an evidence-based comparison. Technol Health Care 2011
  15. Colombo JR Jr, Santos B, Hafron J, Gianduzzo T, Haber GP, Kaouk JH. Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical techniques and outcomes. Int Braz J Urol 2