Journals / Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Transition from Traditional Understanding in the National Security and Intelligence System to the Period of Modern and Changing Needs

Ulusal Güvenlik ve İstihbarat Sisteminde Geleneksel Anlayıştan Modern ve Değişen İhtiyaçlar Dönemine Geçiş

Pages
435–464
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It describes the current national securityorganizational structures and processes and including intelligence analyzersparticularly also defines the roles of the key departments and agencies, furthermore,when necessary, discusses how the interagency process is incorporating the relativelynew organizational structures associated with security bodies of the state.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is critically important to the nation’s well being that how states’ foreign, defense,and other national security policies are developed, coordinated and implemented.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thisprocess begins with the national agencies responsible for national security andintelligence, culminate with the decision making authorities within the country.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It describes the current national securityorganizational structures and processes and including intelligence analyzersparticularly also defines the roles of the key departments and agencies, furthermore,when necessary, discusses how the interagency process is incorporating the relativelynew organizational structures associated with security bodies of the state.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İstihbarat · Ulusal Güvenlik · İstihbarat Analizcisi

Abstract

It is critically important to the nation’s well being that how states’ foreign, defense,and other national security policies are developed, coordinated and implemented. Thisprocess begins with the national agencies responsible for national security andintelligence, culminate with the decision making authorities within the country. Toperform such a critic function, the decision makers need a defined and smoothlyfunctioning policy development and decision-making process. It is evaluated thatbetter to produce laws or regulations directing how policy decisions should be madeother than an extremely broad outline of who should participate in the process, sincemuch depends upon personalities, and the strengths and weaknesses of the people whowork in the intelligence sector, as well as the personality and management style of thedecision makers themselves. This article provides an alternative approach to thenational security decision-making process of the governments and furthermoreanalyzes how the process may be evolved. It describes the current national securityorganizational structures and processes and including intelligence analyzersparticularly also defines the roles of the key departments and agencies, furthermore,when necessary, discusses how the interagency process is incorporating the relativelynew organizational structures associated with security bodies of the state.

Özet

Bir milletin, güvenli ve iyi koşullarda yaşamını sürdürebilmesi için, ilgili devletin dış

🔖

Cite This Article

BİÇER, R. S. S. (2017). Transition from Traditional Understanding in the National Security and Intelligence System to the Period of Modern and Changing Needs. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 435–464. https://ajindex.com/articles/215107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Balcı, M. Kasım (2000). MGK ve Demokrasi; Hukuk, Ordu, Siyaset, Yöneliş Yayınları.
  2. Beck, U. (2005).World Risk Society; Towards a New Modernity, SAGE Publications, Londra. Booth, K. (2007).
  3. Theory of World Security, Cambridge University Press.
  4. Davutoğlu, A. (2001). Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu, Küre Yayınları,
  5. İstanbul.
  6. Fukuyama, F. (2005). Devlet İnşası, 21’nci Yüzyılda Dünya Düzeni ve Yönetişim, Remzi Kitap, İstanbul.
  7. Giddens, A. (1998). Modernliğin Sonuçları, Çev. Ersin Kuşdil, Ayrıntı Yayınları İstanbul. Kent, S. (2003). Stratejik İstihbarat, Çev. Yasemin Ö zbek, Nazlım Şüküroğlu- Arıca, Avrasya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi Yayınları,
  8. Ankara.
  9. Rousseau, J.J. (2006).
  10. Toplum Sözleşmesi, İş Bankası Yayınları,
  11. İstanbul.
  12. Shulsky, A. N. ve Schmitt, G. J. (1993).
  13. Silent Warfare, Washington DC. Brassey’s. Aksu, M. (2012). Faruk Turhan, “Yeni Tehditler, Güvenliğin Genişleme Boyutları ve İnsani Güvenlik”, Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt: 4, Sayı: 2. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 16 Kasım 2016 tarihli R.G. 22 Kasım 2016 29926 kararı. Buzan, B. (1991). New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Security, International Affairs, Vol.67/3 Brauch, H.G. (2008). Güvenliğin Yeniden Kavramsallaştırılması: Barış, Güvenlik, Kalkınma ve Çevre Kavramsal Dörtlüsü, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 5, Sayı 18. Buzan, B. (1991).
  14. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publication. Buzan, B. (1998). Ole Waever, and Jaap de Wilde, Security; A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder Colo. Lynene Rienner Publication. Dunn, M. Nisan (2009).
  15. Cavelty and Victor Maumer, Post Modern Intelligence: Strategic Warning in an Age of Reflexive Intelligence, Security Dialogue, Vol.40 No.2. Küçükşahin, A. Aralık, (2006).
  16. Güvenlik Bağlamında, Risk ve Tehdit Kavramları Arasındaki Farklar Nelerdir ve Nasıl Belirlenmelidir?, Harp Akademileri Stratejik Araştırmalar Enstitüsü Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, Yıl;2 sayı;4. Eker, S. (2015). Savaş Olgusunun Dönüşümü: Yeni Savaşlar ve Suriye Krizi Örneği, Türkiye Ortadoğu Çalışmaları Dergisi, Turkish Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, Cilt: 2, Sayı: 1, s.44 FBI: (2015). Protecting the Homeland in the 21st Century, Report of the Congressionallydirected 9/11 Review Commission to The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation by Commissioners; Bruce Hoffman, Edwin Meese III, Timothy J. Roemer. Gönen, M. A. (Ağusto