Journals / Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A Study Into Of Preschool Teachers’ Views Related To With Family Education Strategies According To Seniority Conditions

Okul Öncesi Eğitimi Alanında Çalışan Öğretmenlerin Aile Eğitim Stratejilerine ilişkin Görüşlerinin Kıdem Durumuna Göre İncelenmesi

Pages
225–249
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The methods they mostly applied were asfollows: it was found that the frequency of practicing family education activities interms of teachers’ status of experience was in that way respectively teachers with anexperience of 1-5 years used individual interviews at the rate of 50.0%; those with anexperience of 1-5 years used educational meetings at the rate of 51.9%; those with anexperience of 1-5 years used activities in class at the rate of 48.7%; those with anexperience of 1-5 years used home visits at the rate of 54.3%; those with an experienceof 1-5 years used educational notice boards at the rate of 49.8% and the ones with anexperience of 1-5 years used conferences at the rate of 47.5%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The current study was carried out to determine the views of preschool teachers withregard to the application of family education activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total sum of 830 teachers participated in the study. “The Questionnaireof Family Education Activities” was applied to the participant teachers prepared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The methods they mostly applied were asfollows: it was found that the frequency of practicing family education activities interms of teachers’ status of experience was in that way respectively teachers with anexperience of 1-5 years used individual interviews at the rate of 50.0%; those with anexperience of 1-5 years used educational meetings at the rate of 51.9%; those with anexperience of 1-5 years used activities in class at the rate of 48.7%; those with anexperience of 1-5 years used home visits at the rate of 54.3%; those with an experienceof 1-5 years used educational notice boards at the rate of 49.8% and the ones with anexperience of 1-5 years used conferences at the rate of 47.5%.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Okul Öncesi Eğitim · Öğretmen · Aile Eğitim Etkinlikleri

Abstract

The current study was carried out to determine the views of preschool teachers withregard to the application of family education activities. In the study, survey methodwas used. A total sum of 830 teachers participated in the study. “The Questionnaireof Family Education Activities” was applied to the participant teachers prepared. Theitems of the questionnaire were formed after reviewing the related literature. Seveninstructors at working at different universities were applied for their expert ideas withregard to the items in the questionnaire and the items were rearranged. Following that,a pilot study was carried out with 120 teachers and the questionnaire was finallyformed. The data obtained were analyzed in the package program of SPSS 15.00through chi square (X2) method.At the end of the study, educational activities that were done by teachers for theparents were given in their frequency order. The methods they mostly applied were asfollows: it was found that the frequency of practicing family education activities interms of teachers’ status of experience was in that way respectively teachers with anexperience of 1-5 years used individual interviews at the rate of 50.0%; those with anexperience of 1-5 years used educational meetings at the rate of 51.9%; those with anexperience of 1-5 years used activities in class at the rate of 48.7%; those with anexperience of 1-5 years used home visits at the rate of 54.3%; those with an experienceof 1-5 years used educational notice boards at the rate of 49.8% and the ones with anexperience of 1-5 years used conferences at the rate of 47.5%. In addition, it was alsofound that the teachers with a working experience of 1-5 applied the stages ofpreparation, practice and evaluation of family education activities at a higher levelcompared to the ones with an experience of 6-10 years and 11 years and over.

Özet

Araştırma, okul öncesi kurumda görev yapan öğretmenlerin aile eğitim etkinliklerine

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVEN, G., BAYRAKTAR, V., TEMEL, Z. F. (2017). A Study Into Of Preschool Teachers’ Views Related To With Family Education Strategies According To Seniority Conditions. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 225–249. https://ajindex.com/articles/215104

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Albritton, T.S. (2003). Parents as teachers: advancing parent ınvolvement in a child’s education Mississipi: The University of Souther Mississipi Aksoy,A. ve Turla,A.(2001). Okul-Aile İşbirliği. Gazi Üniversitesi Anaokulu/Anasınıfı Öğretmeni El Kitabı.İstanbul:Ya-Pa Yayınları Arabacı, N. (2015) Okul Öncesi Eğitimde Aile Katılımı. 2. Baskı. Eds. Ayşe Belgin Aksoy. Aile Eğitimi ve Katılımı. s. 305-327
  2. Aral, N., Kandır, A. & Can Y.M. (2002). Okul Öncesi Eğitim ve Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı. (2. Baskı), İstanbul:
  3. Ya-Pa Yayınları Aral, N., Kandır, A. & Can Y.M. (2006). Okul Öncesi Eğitim ve Ana Sınıfı Programları., İstanbul:
  4. Ya Pa Yayınları Barrera, J.M. & Warner, L. (2006). Involving Families in School Events. Retrieved September 13, 2014, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ724636.pdf
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. (6. Baskı). Ankara:
  6. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Veri Analizi El Kitabı. (8. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık Couchenour,D.&Chrisman, M.K.(2007). Families Schools, and Communites: Together for Young Children (3rdEd.). Clifton Park Eğmez, F.C.K. (2008). Okul Öncesi Eğitim Kurumlarında Ailenin Eğitime Katılımı (Kocaeli’nde Beş Anaokulunda Yapılan Araştırma). (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya Epstein.J.L., Sanders, M.G., Simon, B.S.,Salinas, K.C., Jansorn, N.R.&Voorhis, F.L. (2002).
  7. School, Family and Community Partnership; Your Handbook For Action. (2nd edition). Corwin Pres.:California: Fantuzzo, J., Mcwayne, C. & Perry, A.M. (2004). “Multiple dimensions of Family Involvement and Their relations to Behavioral and Learning Competencies For urban, Low Income Children”, School Psyhology Review, 33(4), 467-480. http://eric.ed.gov
  8. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2003). The fundamentals of collaboration. In M. Friend & L. Cook (Eds.), Interactions: Collaboration Skills for School Professionals (pp. 1- 25). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon Gbadamosi, T. & Lin, H., L., (2003)“Parent’s İnterests, Current involvement and Level of Parental İnvolvement in School Activities”, Alabama State University George, S., M., (2003) Fundamentals of Early Childhood Education, New Jersey: Copyright by Pearson Education, ınc., Upper saddle River, Gestwicki, C. (2007). Home, school, and community relations. 6th ed. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning. Gürşimşek, I., Girgen, G., Harmanlı, Z., ve Ekinci, D. (2002). Çocuğun Eğitiminde Aile Katılımının Önemi (Bir Pilot Çalışma). Erk