Journals / İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

FREQUENCY OF CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME SYMPTOMS AMONG NURSES

HEMŞİRELERDE SÜREĞEN YORGUNLUK YAKINMALARI SIKLIĞI

Pages
167–171
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More researches must be done on this subject.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, it's aimed to find out the frequency of chronic fatigue syndrome among nurses who had attended a congress.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A questionnare, with 20 questions, that is improved to evaluate chronic fatigue syndrome symptoms is applied to 120 volunteer nurses who are working in different departments in 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More researches must be done on this subject.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, it's aimed to find out the frequency of chronic fatigue syndrome among nurses who had attended a congress. Materials and Methods: A questionnare, with 20 questions, that is improved to evaluate chronic fatigue syndrome symptoms is applied to 120 volunteer nurses who are working in different departments in 2012. Results: 21.6% of the nurses (n: 26) gave answers that are harmonious with fatigue. 86.6% of the nurses (n: 104) among 120 volunteers declared that they expose to stress in their working conditions. Besides; ratio of the nurses who always feel themselves tired, exhausted and fatigued. According to further examinations of these nurses, frequency of chronic fatigue syndrome is detected as 5% (n:6) for our study group. Conclusion: Chronic fatigue syndrome frequency is found 5% among nurses for our study sample. This level is lower than the levels in studies for Turkey, but quite high than the levels detected in different countries. More researches must be done on this subject.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada da bir kongre esnasında katılımcı olan hemşirelerdeki süreğen yorgunluk semptomları sıklığı tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2012 yılında değişik servislerde görev yapan ve çalışmayı kabul eden 120 gönüllü hemşireye süreğen yorgunluk yakınmalarını değerlendirmeye yönelik geliştirilmiş olan 20 soruluk bir sormaca uygulandı. Bulgular: Sormacada hemşirelerin %21,6'sında (26) yorgunlukla uyumlu yanıtlar saptandı. Çalışmaya katılan 120 hemşirenin %86,6'sı (104) çalışma ortamında strese maruz kaldığını ifade ederken; kendini sürekli olarak yorgun, bitkin ve halsiz hissedenler %68 (82) oranındaydı. Bu hemşirelerin ileri değerlendirilmelerinde süreğen yorgunluk yakınmaları örneklem içinde %5 (6) olarak saptandı. Sonuç: Farklı hastanelerde çalışan hemşireler arasında süreğen yorgunluk yakınmaları sıklığı %5'dir. Bu değer ülkemizde görece düşük olmasına rağmen; yurtdışındaki değerlere kıyasla daha yüksektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNTAŞ, M., BAŞER, A., KOLCU, G., TUNCER, Ö., GÖK, U. B., ÇADIRCI, D., ÖNGEL, K. (2014). FREQUENCY OF CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME SYMPTOMS AMONG NURSES. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 167–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/214945

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Kara İH. Aile Hekimliğinde Kronik Yorgunluk Sendromunun Değerlendirilmesi. Aktüel Tıp Dergisi 2004; 9:51-9
  2. Öngel K. Kronik Yorgunluk Sendromu. Karayolları Bülteni 2005; 551:28-31
  3. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:953-9
  4. Gunn WJ, Connell DB, Randall B. Epidemiology of chronic fatigue syndrome: the Centers for Disease Control study. In: Bock G, Whelan J editors. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. New York: Wiley, 1983:83-101
  5. Holmes GP, Kaplan JE, Gantz NM. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108:387-9
  6. Lloyd AR, Wakefield D, Boughton C, Dwyer J. What is myalgic encephalomyelitis? [Letter] Lancet 1988; 1:1286-7
  7. Kroenke K, Wood DR, Mangelsdorff AD, Meier NJ, Powell JB. Chronic fatigue in primary care. Prevalence, patient characteristics and outcome. JAMA 1988; 206:929-34
  8. Bates DW, Schmitt W, Buchwald D. Prevalence of fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in a primary care practice. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:2759-65
  9. Jason LA, Jordan KM, Richman JA. A community-based study of prolonged fatigue and chronic fatigue. J Health Psychol 1999; 4:9-26
  10. Cathébras P, Bouchou K, Charmion S, Rousset H. Le syndrome de fatigue chronique: une revue critique. La Revue de Médecine Interne 1993; 14(4):233-42
  11. Glaser R, Padgett DA, Litsky ML. Stress-associated changes in the steady-state expression of latent Epstein-Barr virus: Implications for chronic fatigue syndrome and cancer. Brain Behavior and Immunity 2005; 19(2):91-103
  12. Strauss SE, Dale JK, Peter JB, Dinarello CA. Circulating lymphokine levels in the chronic fatigue syndrome. J Infect Dis 1989; 160:1085-6
  13. Huster GD, Peisen R, Engert V. Hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis reactivity in chronic fatigue syndrome and health under psychological, physiological and pharmacological stimulation. Psychosom Med 2002; 64:951-62
  14. Wolbeek M, Van Doornen LJP, Coffeng LE, Kavelaars A, Heijnen CJ. Cortisol and severe fatigue: A longitudinal study in adolescent girls. Psychoneuroendocrinol 2007; 32(2):171-8
  15. De Becker P, De Meirleir K, Joos E. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) response to i.v. ACTH in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Horm Metab Res 1999; 31:18-21
  16. Van Geelen SM, Sinnema G, Hermans HJM, Kuis W. Personality and chronic fatigue syndrome: Methodological and conceptual issues. Clin Psychol Rev 2007; 27(8):885-903
  17. Prins JB, Bos L,