SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

The results of the lumbar microscopic discectomy

Mikroskopik lomber diskektomi sonuçları

Mehmet AYDOĞAN
M. Nuri ERDEM
Halil BURÇ
Gürsel SAKA
İsmail OLTULU
Mehmet TEZER
Pages
279–282
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients who have back and low back pain with the significant radiological signs of lumbar disc herniation can be treated with all treatment modalities of conservative and surgical treratment by spinal surgeons in orthopaedic departments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lumbar discectomy is the most common spinal surgical procedure and long-term outcomes of the procedure are favorable, with high patient satisfaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Clinical records were obtained for 38 patients who underwent discectomy for LDH between 2010 and 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients who have back and low back pain with the significant radiological signs of lumbar disc herniation can be treated with all treatment modalities of conservative and surgical treratment by spinal surgeons in orthopaedic departments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Lumbar discectomy is the most common spinal surgical procedure and long-term outcomes of the procedure are favorable, with high patient satisfaction. This article presents the outcome of patients treated by lumbar microdiscectomy in our orthopaedic and traumatology department. Clinical records were obtained for 38 patients who underwent discectomy for LDH between 2010 and 2012. Surgery was performed by one surgeon using standardized techniques of standard microdiscectomy. Our findings reinforce the accepted surgical indications for lumbar microdiscectomy as effective treatment for radicular leg pain recalcitrant to nonoperative management. Patients who have back and low back pain with the significant radiological signs of lumbar disc herniation can be treated with all treatment modalities of conservative and surgical treratment by spinal surgeons in orthopaedic departments.

Özet

Lomber diskektomi en sık yapılan spinal cerrahi ameliyatıdır, uzun dönem sonuçları iyidir ve yüksek hasta memnuniyeti ile birliktedir. Bu çalışmada, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji kliniğimizde mikrodiskektomi yöntemiyle opere edilen hastaların sonuçlarını tartışmayı amaçladık. 2010-2012 yılları arasında diskektomi yöntemi ile tedavi edilen 38 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Tüm hastalar standart mikroskopik diskektomi tekniğine uygun olarak tek bir cerrah tarafından ameliyat edildi. Sonuçlarımız kabul edilen cerrahi endikasyonlar dahilinde standart lomber mikrodiskektominin konservatif tedaviye dirençli radiküler bacak ağrısı tedavisinde efektif bir metod olduğunu desteklemektedir. Bel ve bacak ağrısı olan ve radyolojik olarak lomber disk hernisi bulguları tespit edilen hastalar konservatif ve cerrahi tedavinin tüm yöntemleri ile ortopedi kliniklerinde spinal cerrahlar tarafından tedavi edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞAN, M., ERDEM, M. N., BURÇ, H., SAKA, G., OLTULU, İ., TEZER, M. (2013). The results of the lumbar microscopic discectomy. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 279–282. https://ajindex.com/articles/213828

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Best NM, Sasso RC. Success and safety in outpatient microlumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19: 334 –337
  2. Caspar W. A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach, Adv Neurosurgery 1977; 4: 74– 80
  3. Cyress BK. Charateristcs of Physician Visits for Back Symptoms: A National Perspective. Am J Public Health 1983; 73: 389-395
  4. Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 1994; 80: 415–421
  5. Dewing CB, Provencher MT, Riffenburgh RH, Kerr S, Manos RE. The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level. Spine 2008; 33: 33–38
  6. Dvorak J, Gauchat M-H, Valach L. The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A 4–17 years’ follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine 1988; 13: 1418–1422
  7. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine 2000; 25: 2940–2952; discussion 2952
  8. Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med 1988; 318(5): 291-300
  9. Hijikata S. Percutaneous nucleotomy: A new concept technique and 12 years’ experience. Clin Orthop 1989; 238: 9–23
  10. Hu SS. Lumbar disc herniation section of disorders, diseases, and injuries of the spine, In: Skinner HB, Ed., Current Diagnosis and Treatment in Orthopedics, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006; pp: 246– 249
  11. Lau D, Han SJ, Lee JG, Lu DC, Chou D. Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Clin Neurosci 2011;18:81–84
  12. Mannismaki P, Vanharanta H, Puranen J. Disability 20–30 years after disc surgery: A follow-up of 162 patients. Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, Marseilles, France, June 15–19, 1993
  13. Mochida J, Arima T. Percutaneous nucleotomy in lumbar disc herniation. Spine 1993; 18: 2063–2068
  14. Ng LC, Sell P. Predictive value of the duration of sciatica for lumbar discectomy. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg 2004; 86-B: 546–549
  15. Sherman J, Cauthen J, Schoenberg D, Burns M, Reaven NL, Griffith SL. Economic impact of improving outcomes of lumbar discectomy. Spine J 2010; 10: 108– 116
  16. Smyth H, Gallagher J, McManus F. Surgery in lumbar disc protrusion: A long-term follow-up. Irish Med J 1983; 76: 25–26
  17. Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation: A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 1983; 8: 131–140
  18. Weinstein