SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

The importance of the sagittal balance of the spine and spinopelvic parameters

Omurgada sagittal dengenin önemi ve spinopelvik parametreler

MUSTAFA KARADEMİR
Ergün KARAVELİOĞLU
M. Gazi BOYACI
Olcay ESER
Pages
139–148
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Degenerative spondylolisthesis, isthmic spondylolisthesis, lumbar disc herniation, pedicle subtraction osteotomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) were evaluated as clinical manifestations, with spinopelvic parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article explains the significance of sagittal balance of the spine and spinopelvic parameters associated with sagittal balance of the spine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Here in the parameters related spinal sagittal balance are C7 plumb line, gravity line, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt angle.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Degenerative spondylolisthesis, isthmic spondylolisthesis, lumbar disc herniation, pedicle subtraction osteotomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) were evaluated as clinical manifestations, with spinopelvic parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article explains the significance of sagittal balance of the spine and spinopelvic parameters associated with sagittal balance of the spine. Here in the parameters related spinal sagittal balance are C7 plumb line, gravity line, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt angle. Degenerative spondylolisthesis, isthmic spondylolisthesis, lumbar disc herniation, pedicle subtraction osteotomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) were evaluated as clinical manifestations, with spinopelvic parameters.

Özet

Bu makalede omurgada sagittal dengenin önemi ve sagittal denge ile bağlantılı olan spinopelvik parametrelerden bahsedilmektedir. Omurgadaki sagittal denge ile ilişkili anlatılan parametreler; C7 şakül hattı, ağırlık çizgisi hattı, pelvik insidans, sakral eğim, pelvik eğim açılarıdır. Dejeneratif spondilolistezis, istmik spondilolistezis, lomber disk hernisi, pedikül substraksiyon osteotomi ve posterior lomber interbody füzyon (PLIF) klinik tabloları spinopelvik parametreler eşliğinde değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARADEMİR, M., KARAVELİOĞLU, E., BOYACI, M. G., ESER, O. (2014). The importance of the sagittal balance of the spine and spinopelvic parameters. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 139–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/213259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P. Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degene- rative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 2007;16 (9): 1459-1467
  2. Dubousset J. Le bassin os intercalaire. Monographie Du Gers 1984; 15-22
  3. Errico TJ, Lonner BS, Moulton AW. Surgical Ma- nagement of Spinal Deformities
  4. Ed., 2009; pp: 4-12
  5. Feng Y, Chen L, Gu Y. Influence of the posterior lumbar interbody fusion on the sagittal spinopelvic pa- rameters in isthmic L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Di- sord Tech 2014; In press
  6. Gottfried ON, Daubs MD, Patel AA, Dailey AT, Brodke DS. Spinopelvic parameters in postfusion flat- back deformity patients. Spine J 2009; 9(8): 639-647
  7. Harding IJ. Understanding sagittal balance with a clinical perspective. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 45: 571-582
  8. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, Mcmanus AD, Hales C. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 1998; 23(16): 1750-1767
  9. Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S, Hart R, Burton D, Smith Js, Et All. Does vertebral level of pedicle subtrac- tion osteotomy correlate with degree of spinopelvic para- meter correction? J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 14: 184–191
  10. Lamartina C, Berjano P, Petruzzi M, Sinigaglia A, Casero G, Cecchinato R, Damilano M, Bassani R. Cri- teria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and de- generative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (Suppl. 1): 27–31
  11. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic lncidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998; 7: 99–103
  12. Le Huec JC, Saddiki R, Franke J, Rigal J, Aunoble S. Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line the basics. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 ( Suppl. 5): 558–563
  13. Lim JK, Kim SM. Difference of sagittal spinopelvic alignments between degenerative spondylolisthesis and isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013; 53: 96-101
  14. Mehta VA, Amin A, Omeis I, Gökaslan Zl, Gott- fried ON. Implications of spinopelvic alignment for the spine surgeon. Neurosurgery 2012; 70: 707–721
  15. Özer AF, Kaner T. Omurgada sagittal denge. J Turk Neurosurgery 2013; 23 (Suppl.: 2): 13-18
  16. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Illes T. The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Intern Orthop (SIC