Journals / JAREM / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Intertrokanterik femur kırığının intramedüller çivi ile fiksasyonunda kompresyon vidasının pelvi içine migrasyonu

Pelvic migration of lag screw following fixation of an ıntertrochanteric femur fracture with proximal femoral nail

Journal
JAREM
Pages
44–46
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The patient was subsequently treated with lag screw removal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Intertrochanteric femur fractures are very common in patients over 65 years old who have prominent osteoporosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Proximal femoral nails are preferred because of their biomechanical advantages in the treatment of these fractures especially if the fracture is unstable with medial calcar discontinuity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The patient was subsequently treated with lag screw removal.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Intertrochanteric femur fractures are very common in patients over 65 years old who have prominent osteoporosis. Proximal femoral nails are preferred because of their biomechanical advantages in the treatment of these fractures especially if the fracture is unstable with medial calcar discontinuity. However, many complications associated with intramedullary fracture fixation have been described following common use of these implants. Here, we report a rare complication of a short intramedullary nail in which medial pelvic migration of the lag screw was detected at eighth week postoperatively. The patient was subsequently treated with lag screw removal.

Özet

İntertrokanterik femur kalça kırıkları 65 yaş üstü ve osteoporozu olan yaşlı populasyonda oldukça yaygındır. Bu kırıkların tedavisinde, özellikle medi- al kalkar devamsızlığının olduğu anstabil olgularda, biyomekanik avantajlarından dolayı, proksimal kalça çivileri tercih edilmektedir. Bu implantların yaygın kullanımı sonrasında çok sayıda komplikasyon tarif edilmiştir. Bu yazımızda tek vidalı proksimal femoral çivi kullanılarak tedavi edilmiş olan bir intertrokanterik kalça kırığı olgusunda proksimal çektirme vidasının ameliyat sonrasındaki sekizinci haftada intrapelvik medial migrasyonuna değindik. Hasta migre olan vidanın çıkarılması ile tedavi edildi

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAY, S., SATOĞLU, İ. S., ÇABUK, H., Turan, K. (2013). Intertrokanterik femur kırığının intramedüller çivi ile fiksasyonunda kompresyon vidasının pelvi içine migrasyonu. JAREM, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 44–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/212627

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Rubenstein L. Hip protectors-a breakthrough in fracture prevention. N Engl J Med 2000
  2. [CrossRef] 2.Richmond J, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ. Mortality risk after hip fracture. J of Orthop Trauma 2003
  3. [CrossRef] 3.Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK. A prospective randomised com- parison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993
  4. Briddle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochan- teric fractures of the femur. A randomized prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991
  5. Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, Ali MS. Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail
  6. a prospective randomized control trial. Injury 1995
  7. [CrossRef] 6. Rerri BE, Ayorinde RO, Opadele T, Onayemi B. Short gamma nail Fixation for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2011
  8. [CrossRef] 7. O’Brien PJ, Meek RN, Blachut PA, Broekhuyse HM, Sabharwal S. Fixa- tion of intertrochanteric hip fractures: gamma nail versus dynamic hip screw. A randomized, prospective study. Can J Surg 1995
  9. Goldhagen PR, O’Connor DR, Schwarze D, Schwartz E. A prospecti- ve comparative study of the compression hip screw and the gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma 1994
  10. [CrossRef] 9. Appelt A, Suhm N, Baier M, Meeder PJ. Complications after intra- medullary stabilization of proximal femur fractures: a retrospective- analysis of 178 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2007
  11. [CrossRef] 10. Hesse B, Gächter A. Complications following the treatmentof troc- hanteric fractures with the gamma nail. Arch OrthopTrauma Surg 2004
  12. [CrossRef] 11. Papasimos S, Koutsojannis CM, Panagopoulos A, Megas P, Lambiris E. A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005
  13. [CrossRef] 12. Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, Hockertz T, Vochteloo AJ, Ochs U, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury 2008
  14. [CrossRef] 13. Pu JS, Liu L, Wang GL, Fang Y, Yang TF. Results of the proximal femo- ral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients. Int Orthop 2009
  15. [CrossRef] 14. Tang P, Hu F, Shen J, Zhang L, Zhang L. Proximal femoral nail antiro- tation versus hemiarthroplasty: a study for the treatment of i