Journals / Anadolu / 2020 / Sayı: 46

THE PRE-POTTERY NEOLITHIC A PERIOD RADIAN PLAN STRUCTURES IN ÇEMKA HÖYÜK

ÇEMKA HÖYÜK’TE AÇIĞA ÇIKARILAN ÇANAK-ÇÖMLEKSİZ NEOLİTİK DÖNEM A EVRESİ RADYAN PLANLI YAPILARI

Journal
Anadolu
Pages
25–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Another feature of the Çemka Höyük is that, it gives important information about the cultural structure of the region and its relationship with the surrounding regions during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic Period due to the presence of Radians Planned structures (round plan with internal corners), which are unmatched in the South-eastern Anatolia Region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, important information about the history of South-eastern Anatolia region has been obtained thanks to the increasing archaeological excavations in parallel with the dam rescue excavations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, archaeological excavations carried out in Çemka Höyük in 2019 within the scope of Ilısu Dam and HEP Project provide important information about the Upper Tigris basin late Pre-Pottery Neolithic A phase and the Late Epipaleolithic Period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Another feature of the Çemka Höyük is that, it gives important information about the cultural structure of the region and its relationship with the surrounding regions during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic Period due to the presence of Radians Planned structures (round plan with internal corners), which are unmatched in the South-eastern Anatolia Region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In recent years, important information about the history of South-eastern Anatolia region has been obtained thanks to the increasing archaeological excavations in parallel with the dam rescue excavations. Especially after many archaeological excavations carried out within the scope of Ilısu Dam and HEP Project, important data on the Neolithic Period cultures of the region were obtained. In this context, archaeological excavations carried out in Çemka Höyük in 2019 within the scope of Ilısu Dam and HEP Project provide important information about the Upper Tigris basin late Pre-Pottery Neolithic A phase and the Late Epipaleolithic Period. A large number of circle structures, chipped stone, grinding stone tools and graves were unearthed in the settlement. Another feature of the Çemka Höyük is that, it gives important information about the cultural structure of the region and its relationship with the surrounding regions during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic Period due to the presence of Radians Planned structures (round plan with internal corners), which are unmatched in the South-eastern Anatolia Region.

Özet

Son yıllarda, Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde baraj kurtarma kazılarıyla paralel olarak artan arkeolojik kazı çalışmalarında bölgenin uzak geçmişine dair önemli bilgiler elde edilmiştir. Bilhassa Ilısu Barajı ve HES Projesi kapsamında yapılan arkeolojik kazılar sonrası bölgenin Neo-litik Çağ kültürleri üzerine önemli veriler ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Bu bağlamda Ilısu Barajı ve HES Projesi kapsamında 2019 yılında Çemka Höyük’te yürütülen arkeolojik kazılar Yukarı Dicle Vadisi Çanak-Çömleksiz Neolitik dönem A evresi ve Geç Epi-Paleolitik dönem hakkında önemli bilgiler vermektedir. Yerleşim yerinde çok sayıda yuvarlak planlı yapı, yontmataş ve sürtme taş alet ve mezar açığa çıkarılmıştır. Çemka Höyük yerleşim yerinin bir diğer özelliği ise Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde örneği olmayan ve daha çok Suriye’de bulunan yerleşim yerleri ile özdeşleştirilen Rad-yan Planlı (içten köşeli bölmeli yuvarlak planlı1) yapıların bulunmasıdır. Hem Çanak-Çömleksiz Neolitik Dönem’de bölgenin kültürel yapısı hem de çevre bölgelerle olan ilişkisi hakkında önemli bilgiler vermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTÇİ, Y., KODAŞ, E., GENÇ, B. (2020). THE PRE-POTTERY NEOLITHIC A PERIOD RADIAN PLAN STRUCTURES IN ÇEMKA HÖYÜK. Anadolu, Sayı: 46, 25–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/211712

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abbes 2014 F. Abbes, “Le Bal’as, un autre scénario de la néolithisation du Proche-Orient”, içinde: C. Manen – T. Perrin – J. Guilaine (ed.), La transition néolithique en Méditerranée (Actes du colloque Transitions en Méditerranée, ou comment des chasseurs devinrent agriculteurs, Muséum de Toulouse, 14-15 avril 2011), Archives d’écologie préhistorique, éditions Errance-Actes Sud, (Arles 2014), 9-21. Altınbilek-Algül 2013 Ç. Altınbilek-Algül, “The lithic assemblages of Gusir Höyük (Turkey): the preliminary results”, içinde: F. Borrell, J.J. Ibáñez – M. Molist (ed.), Stone tools in transition: From hunter-gatherers to farming societies in the Near East. Proceedings of the 7th conference on PPN chipped and ground stone industries of the Fertile Crescent. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Servei de Publi-cacions. (Barcelona 2013), 289-298. Aurenche – Kozlowski 2000 O. Aurenche – S.K. Kozlowski, 2000. La Naissance Du Néolit-hique Au Proche Orient. Editions Errance, (Paris 2000). Aurenche – Kozlowski 2010 O. Aurenche – S.K. Kozlowski. Territories, Boundaries And Cultu-res in The Neolithic Near East. Bar International Series 1362. Arc-haeopress, (Oxford 2010). Benz ve diğ. 2015 M. Benz – K. Deckers – C. Rössner – A. Alexandrovskiy – K. Pustovoytov – S. Scheeres – M. Fecher – A. Coşkun – S. Riehl – K. W. Alt – V. Özkaya, Prelude to village life. Environmental data and building traditions of the Epipalaeolithic settlement at Körtik Tepe, Southeastern Turkey. Paléorient 41/2, 2015, 9-30. Cauvin 1980
  2. J. Cauvin. “Mureybet et Cheikh Hassan”, içinde: J. Margueron (ed.), Le Moyen Euphrate, zone de contacts et d’echanges. Actes du col-loque de Strasbourg (Mars 1977), (Leiden 1980), 21-34. Cauvin 1994
  3. J. Cauvin, Naissance des divinités. Naissance de l’agriculture. La révolu-tion des symboles au Néolithique, CNRS Éditions, (Paris 1994). Contenson – Van Liere 1966 H. Contenson – W.J. Van Liere, “Premier Sondage À Bouqras En 1965. Rapport Préliminaire”, Annales Archéologiques Arabes Syriennes, 16/2, 1966, 181-192. Coqueugniot 2009 E. Coqueugniot, 2009. “Dja’Dé el Mughara (Syrie), Rapport sci-entifique 2007”, Archéorient, Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditer-rannée, (Lyon 2009). Erim-Özdoğan 2011 A. Erim-Özdoğan, “Çayönü”, içinde: M. Özdogan – N. Basge-len – P. Kuniholm (ed.), The Neolithic in Turkey Volume 1. Arc-haeology And Art Publications, (İstanbul 2011), 185-269. Finlayson ve diğ. 2011 B. Finlayson – J. Mithen – M. Najjar – S. Maricevic – N. Pank-hurst (2011). “Arc