SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Girişimsel koroner anjiyografi sırasında göz içi basıncı değişir mi?

Does intraocular pressure change during invasive coronary angiography?

Kemal TÜRKYILMAZ
Mehmet Gökhan ASLAN
Veysi ÖNER
YÜKSEL ÇİÇEK
BERRAK ŞEKERYAPAN GEDİZ
Mustafa DURMUŞ
Pages
235–238
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Invasive coronary angiography is a safe procedure in terms of IOP fluctuations in individuals without any eye disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) changes during invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients underwent elective coronary angiography due to various con- ditions were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Invasive coronary angiography is a safe procedure in terms of IOP fluctuations in individuals without any eye disease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) changes during invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Materials and Methods: Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients underwent elective coronary angiography due to various con- ditions were included in this study. IOPs and mean arterial blood pressures (MBP) were measured before (IOP1, MBP1), during (IOP2, MBP2) and after (IOP3, MBP3) ICA procedure. Results: 15 male, 12 female patients were prospectively recruited and mean age of patients was 65.5±6.7 years. MBP1, MBP2 and MBP3 values were 112±18.7 mmHg, 108.5±13.4 mmHg and 109.4±12.2 mmHg, respectively. No statistically significant change was detected between MBP values (p>0.05). Mean IOP1, IOP2 and IOP3 values were 18.3±3.7 mmHg, 18.5±.4.2 mmHg and 18.0±3.3 mm-Hg, respectively. A slightly increase in IOP during the procedure was identified, but it was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusions: Invasive coronary angiography is a safe procedure in terms of IOP fluctuations in individuals without any eye disease.

Özet

Amaç: Invazif koroner anjiyografi (İKA) sırasında göziçi basıncı (GİB) değişikliğini değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çeşitli koşullar nedeniyle elektif İKA yapılan 27 hastanın 27 gözü çalışmaya dahil edildi. GİB ve ortalama kan basınçları (OKB) İKA işleminden önce (GİB1, OKB1), İKA işlemi sırasında (GİB2, OKB2) ve İKA işleminden sonra (GİB3, OKB3) ölçüldü. Bulgular: Hastaların 15’i erkek, 12 kadındı. Ortalama yaşları 65.5±6.7 yıldı. OKB1, OKB2 ve OKB3 değerleri sırayla 112’si±18.7 mmHg, 108.5±13.4 mmHg ve 109.4±12.2 mmHg tespit edildi. OKB değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir değişiklik tespit edilmedi (p>0.05). IOP1, IOP2 ve IOP3 değerleri sırayla 18.3±3.7 mmHg, 18.5±4.2 mmHg ve 18.0±3.3 mmHg tespit edildi.İşlem sırasında ortalama GİB’nda hafif artış izlense de bu artış istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi (p>0.05). Sonuç: İnvaziv koroner anjiyografi herhangi bir göz hastalığı olmayan bireylerde GİB dalgalanmaları açısından güvenli bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKYILMAZ, K., ASLAN, M. G., ÖNER, V., ÇİÇEK, Y., GEDİZ, B. Ş., DURMUŞ, M. (2013). Girişimsel koroner anjiyografi sırasında göz içi basıncı değişir mi?. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 235–238. https://ajindex.com/articles/210889

References (17)

  1. Anraku A, Jin YP, Butty Z, et al. The Toronto epidemiology glaucoma survey: a pilot study. Can J Ophthalmol 2011
  2. Song W, Shan L, Cheng F, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in a rural northern china adult population a population-based survey in kailu county, inner Mongolia. Ophthalmology 2011
  3. Garudadri C, Senthil S, Khanna RC, et al. Prevalence and risk fac- tors for primary glaucomas in adult urban and rural populations in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 2010
  4. Radner S. An attempt at the roentgenologic visualization of coronary blood vessels in man. Acta Radiol Suppl (Stockholm) 2008
  5. Sones FM Jr, Shırey EK. Cine coronary arteriography.Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1962
  6. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001
  7. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery ste-noses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically gat- ed, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001
  8. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, et al. Value of electronbeam com- puted tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary artery stenoses and occlusions. N Engl J Med 1998
  9. Tavakol M, Ashraf S, Brener SJ. Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review. Glob J Health Sci 2012
  10. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma world- wide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006
  11. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the preva- lence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Jama 1991
  12. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002
  13. Meira-Freitas D, Melo LA Jr, Almeida-Freitas DB, et al. Glaucomatous optic nerve head alterations in patients with chronic heart failure Clin Ophthalmol 2012
  14. Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL. Intraocular pressure in an American community. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992
  15. Broadway DC, Drance SM. Glaucoma and vasospasm. Br J Ophthal- mol 1998
  16. Grieshaber MC, Flammer J. Blood flow in glaucoma. Curr Opin Oph- thalmol 2005
  17. Jürgens C, Grossjohann R, Tost FH. Relationship of systemic blood p