Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2014 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Afakik ve Psödofakik Gözlerdeki Çeşitli Glokom Tiplerinde Endoskopik Lazer Siklofotokoagülasyon Tedavisi

Endoscopic Laser Cyclophotocoagulation Treatment in Various Types of Glaucoma in Aphakic and Pseudophakic Eyes

Pages
83–88
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Its main advantage is in giving surgeons the opportunity to see ciliary bodies while photocoagulating them

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) in aphakic and pseudophakic glaucoma patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This retrospective case series comprised 53 eyes of 52 patients (36 males, 16 females) who under- went ECP.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Its main advantage is in giving surgeons the opportunity to see ciliary bodies while photocoagulating them
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) in aphakic and pseudophakic glaucoma patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case series comprised 53 eyes of 52 patients (36 males, 16 females) who under- went ECP. The types of glaucoma in the patients were as follows: primary open angle glaucoma (21 eyes, 39%), pseudoexfo- liative glaucoma (10 eyes, 19%), secondary congenital glaucoma (6 eyes, 11%), neovascular glaucoma (5 eyes, 9%), glaucoma after pars plana vitrectomy (4 eyes, 8%), glaucoma after keratoplasty (3 eyes, 6%), glaucoma after blunt trauma to the eye (2 eyes, 4%) and glaucoma due to Sturge-Weber Syndrome (2 eyes, 4%). Results: Patients' ages ranged from 3 to 80 years (mean age was 59.1±21.4 years). Mean follow-up time was 12.0 months (SD: 5,2). Mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was 24.6 (SD: 7.8) mmHg, and mean postoperative IOP at the last visit was 16.5 (SD: 5.1) mmHg (p<0.001). The average number of anti-glaucoma medications used by the patients decreased from 2.87 (SD: 0.98) to 2.13 (SD:1,26), (p<0.001). The success rate of the treatment was 83%. Conclusions: ECP is a safe, effective, and repeatable procedure in aphakic and pseudophakic glaucoma patients. Its main advantage is in giving surgeons the opportunity to see ciliary bodies while photocoagulating them

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmadaki amaç, afak veya psödofakik glokomlu hastalarda uyguladığımız endoskopik lazer siklofotokoagülasyon tekniğinin etkinliğini ve güvenliğini değerlendirmektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: ESF uygulanan 52 hastanın (36 erkek, 16 kadın) 53 gözü retrospektif olarak incelendi. Daha önce başka metodla siklodestrüksiyon uygulanan hastalar çalışmaya alınmadı. Çalışmaya alınan hastalardaki glokom tipleri; primer açık açılı glokom (21 göz-%39), psödoeksfoliatif glokom (10 göz-%19), sekonder konjenital glokom (6 göz-%11), neovasküler glokom (5 göz-%9), pars plana vitrektomi sonrası glokom (4 göz-%8), keratoplasti sonrası glokom (3 göz-%6), künt travma sonrası glokom (2 göz-%4) ve Sturge Weber Sendromuna bağlı glokom (2 göz-%4) şeklindeydi.Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşı 59.1 yıl (SD:21.4) (3-80 yaş), ortalama takip süresi ise 12.0 aydı (SD:5.2). Hastaların pre-operatif ortalama göz içi basıncı (GİB) değeri 24.6 (SD:7.8) mmHg iken post-operatif son kontrolde bu değer 16.5 (SD:5,1) mmHg olarak saptanmıştı (p<0.001). Hastaların pre-operatif kullandıkları antiglokomatöz ilaç adedi ortalama olarak 2.87 (SD:0.98) iken post-operatif son kontrollerindeki ortalama ilaç adedi ise 2,13 (SD:1.26) olarak saptandı (p<0.001). Tedavinin başarı oranı %83 olarak tespit edildi. Sonuç: ESF, afak ve psödofakik glokomlu hastalarda etkili, güvenilir ve tekrarlanabilir bir yöntemdir. En büyük avantajı, siliyer cisimleri görerek tedavi etme şansı sağlamasıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKEL, G., BOZKURT, E., BAYRAKTAR, Ş., İMAMOĞLU, S., PEKEL, E., YILMAZ, Ö. F. (2014). Afakik ve Psödofakik Gözlerdeki Çeşitli Glokom Tiplerinde Endoskopik Lazer Siklofotokoagülasyon Tedavisi. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 83–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/209790

References (12)

  1. Shields MB. Cyclodestructive surgery for glaucoma: past, present, and future. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1985;83:285-303.
  2. Simmons RB, Shields MB, Blasini M, et al. Transcleral Nd:YAG laser cyclophotocoagulation with a contact lens. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;112:671-7. Bellows AR. Cyclocryotherapy for glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1981;21:99-111.
  3. Chen J, Cohn RA, Lin SC, et al. Endoscopic photocoagulation of the ciliary body for treatment of refractory glaucomas. Am J Oph- thalmol 1997;124:787-96. Berke SJ. Endolaser Cyclophotocoagulation in Glaucoma Manage- ment. Techniques in Ophthalmology 2006;4:74-81. Weston J. Techniques of Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation. Tech- niques in Ophthalmology 2008;6:98-104.
  4. Carter BC, Plager DA, Neely DE, et al. Endoscopic diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the management of aphakic and pseudo- phakic glaucoma in children. J AAPOS 2007;11:34-40.
  5. Lima FE, Neto JB, Toscano D, et al. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagu- lation in refractory glaucomas: a long term study. Rev Bras Oftal- mol 2009;68:146-51.
  6. Murthy GJ, Murthy PR, Murthy KR, et al. A study of the efficacy of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of refrac- tory glaucomas. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57:127-32. Uram M. Ophthalmic laser microendoscope endophotocoagula- tion. Ophthalmology 1992; 99:1829-32.
  7. McGuigan LJB, Gottsch J, Stark WJ, et al. Extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber lens implantation in eyes with preexisting glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:1301-8.
  8. Steuhl KP, Marahrens P, Frohn C, et al. Intraocular pressure and anterior chamber depth before and after extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation. Ophthalmic Surg 1992;23:233-7.
  9. Netland PA, Mansberger SL, Lin S. Uncontrolled Intraocular Pressure After Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma 2007;16:265-67.
  10. Yu JY, Kahook MY, Lathrop KL, et al. The Effect of Probe Place- ment and Type of Viscoelastic Material on Endoscopic Cyclophoto- coagulation Laser Energy Transmission. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2008;39:133-6.
  11. Kahook MY, Lathrop KL, Noecker RJ. One-site Versus Two-site Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma 2007;16:527-30. Lin S. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:1434-38.
  12. Pantcheva MB, Kahook MY, Schuman JS, et al. Comparison of acute structural and histopathological changes of the porcine ciliary process- es after endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and transscleral cyclophoto- coagulation. Clinical and Experimental O