Journals / KBB-Forum / 2004 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Our results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

Endoskopik endonazal dakriosistorinostomi sonuçlarımız

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
80–85
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The method is found to be very useful since its duration was short, enables the direct visualization of intranasal pathologies of lacrimal system, leaves no cutaneous scar and is tolerated well by the patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Described in 1904 and modified later external dacryocystorhinostomy (ExDCR) has been accepted as a standard surgical technique in the treatment of obstructions in the lacrimal drainage system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although intranasal approach was reported 11 years before this description, this approach was not put into practice as a routine application because of some technical difficulties encountered at that time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The method is found to be very useful since its duration was short, enables the direct visualization of intranasal pathologies of lacrimal system, leaves no cutaneous scar and is tolerated well by the patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar · Dakriyosistit · Dakriyosistorinostomi

Abstract

Described in 1904 and modified later external dacryocystorhinostomy (ExDCR) has been accepted as a standard surgical technique in the treatment of obstructions in the lacrimal drainage system. Although intranasal approach was reported 11 years before this description, this approach was not put into practice as a routine application because of some technical difficulties encountered at that time. The risk of injury to the medial canthal ligament and lacrimal pump mechanism, the need for skin incision in ExDCR as well as recent technical developments in nasal endoscopy have again brought the endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) into agenda because of some superiorities such as low risk of surgical trauma, achievement of intraoperative hemostasis, decreased postoperative morbidity, and elimination of skin incision resurrected. Objective: In this study our purpose is to evaluate the results of follow-up time for the patients who were operated by endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and bicanallicular sillicone tube intubation. Pateients and Method: 32 patients who had been operated for chronic dacryocystitis were evaluated. 22 (69%) of 32 patients were female and 10 (31%) were male. Mean age was 43,3 (8-67 year). Postoperative follow-up time was 38,4 months (6-60 months). Results: Success rates were 87% in primary EDCRs and increased to 96% by revision EDCRs. Conclusion: The method is found to be very useful since its duration was short, enables the direct visualization of intranasal pathologies of lacrimal system, leaves no cutaneous scar and is tolerated well by the patients.

Özet

Eksternal dakriosistorinostomi (ExDSR) 1904’de Toti1 tarafından tanımlanıp daha sonra Dupuy-Dutemps ve Bourget2 tarafından modifiye edildiğinden beri lakrimal kanal tıkanıklıklarının tedavisinde temel ameliyat şekli olmuştur. İntranazal dakriosistorinostomi ise Caldwell3 tarafından 1893’de tanımlanmasına rağmen ancak son yıllarda endoskopların burun içi kullanımının yaygınlaşması ile popülarite kazanmıştır. Amaç: Bu çalışmada kronik dakriosistit nedeni ile endoskopik endonazal dakriosistorinostomi ve silikon tüp entübasyonu uygulanan 32 hastanın postoperatif sonuçlarını değerlendirdik. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 32 hasta alındı. Hastaların 22’si (%69) kadın, 10’u (%31) erkek olup, yaşları 8-67 arasında (ortalama 43,3) değişmekteydi. Opere edilen hastaları 6- 60 ay takip ederek başarı oranını ve komplikasyonları tespit ettik. Bulgular: Primer cerrahi sonrası altı aylık takipten sonra başarı oranı %87 (28/32), iken revizyon cerrahi sonrası bu oranın %96’ya (31/32) çıktığını gördük. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonunda EEDSR’nin hastalar tarafından iyi tolere edilebilen, dışarıdan görülebilir insizyon skarına neden olmadığı için kozmetik açıdan tercih edilen, travma potansiyelinin minimal ve başarı oranının yüksek olduğu fonksiyonel bir operasyon olduğu kanısına vardık.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, E., DOĞAN, M., EREN, Y., VURAL, Ş., GÜRSEL, A. O. (2004). Our results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 80–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/209378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA, Awdry P. Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye. 1993
  2. 7 ( Pt 4):545-9. [ Özet ] 2) El-Guindy A, Dorgham A, Ghoraba M. Endoscopic revision surgery for recurrent epiphora occurring after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000 Apr
  3. 109(4):425-30. [ Özet ] 3) Benger R, Forer M. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy--primary and secondary. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1993 Aug
  4. 21(3):157-9. [ Özet ] 4) Rice DH. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy in four patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Sep
  5. 116(9):1061. [ Özet ] 5) Mcdonogh M. Endoscopic Transnasal Dacryocystorhinostomy. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Results in 21 patients. S Afr J Surg. 1992 Sep
  6. 30(3):107-. [ Özet ] 6) Jokinen K, Karja J. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974 Jul
  7. 100(1):41-4. [ Özet ] 7) Stammberger H. Endoscopic endonasal surgery--concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part II. Surgical technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986 Feb
  8. 94(2):147-56. [ Özet ] 8) Kennedy DW. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Technique.Arch Otolaryngol. 1985 Oct
  9. 111(10):643-9. [ Özet ] 9) Weidenbecher M, Hosemann W, Buhr W. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 56 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994 May
  10. 103(5 Pt 1):363-7. [ Özet ] 10) Hartikainen J, Antila J, Varpula M, Puukka P, Seppa H, Grenman R. Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope. 1998 Dec
  11. 108(12):1861-6. [ Özet ] 11) Kohler U, Muller W. Nasennebenhöhlenbefunde bei röntgenisch dacryostenosen.(Paranasal sinus findings in roentgenologically established dacryostenoses) Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1968
  12. 152(6):813-6. German. [ Özet ] 12) Eloy P, Bertrand B, Martinez M, Hoebeke M, Watelet JB, Jamart J. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: indications, technique and results. Rhinology. 1995 Dec
  13. 33(4):229-33. [ Özet ] 13) Allen K, Berlin AJ. Dacryocystorhinostomy failure: association with nasolacrimal silicone intubation. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989 Jul
  14. 20(7):486-9. [ Özet ] 14) Boush GA, Lemke BN, Dortzbach RK. Results of endonasal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 1994 May
  15. 101(5):955-9. [ Özet ] 15) Woog JJ, Metson R, Puliafito CA.Holmium:YAG endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jul 15
  16. 116(1):1-10. [ Özet ] 16) Kong YT, Kim TI, Kong BW. A report of 131 cases of endoscopic laser lacrimal surge