Journals / Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Compound Fertilizer Applications in Different Forms and Components on Sugar Beet Yield and Quality and Economic Analysis

Farklı Form ve Bileşendeki Kompoze Gübre Uygulamalarının Şeker Pancarı Verim ve Kalite Değerleri Üzerine Etkisi ve Ekonomik Analizi

Pages
255–267
Publication Date
2021-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the economic analysis, the fertilizer and fertilization costs of lean NPK (15-15-15 and 12-30-12) compound fertilizer applications were found to be 23.23 % lower than secondary and micronutrient added compound fertilizers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out at the Sugar Institute Etimesgut Experiment Station in 2015 and 2016 in order to determine the effect of compound fertilizers in different forms and components on yield and quality values of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, besides measuring the yield and quality values of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), fertilization costs were also conducted to fertilizer applications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the economic analysis, the fertilizer and fertilization costs of lean NPK (15-15-15 and 12-30-12) compound fertilizer applications were found to be 23.23 % lower than secondary and micronutrient added compound fertilizers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Composed fertilizer · Sugar beet · Root yield

Abstract

This study was carried out at the Sugar Institute Etimesgut Experiment Station in 2015 and 2016 in order to determine the effect of compound fertilizers in different forms and components on yield and quality values of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). In the study, besides measuring the yield and quality values of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), fertilization costs were also conducted to fertilizer applications. The trials were set up with 4 replications in both years according to the randomized blocks trial design. Research issues; a) 12-30-12, b) 15-15-15, c) 13-18-15 + 2 Mg + 10 SO3 + 0.5 B, d) 10-25-20 + 25 SO3 + ME (0.5 % Zn), e) 7-18-7 + 11 SO3 + B + Mn + Zn (0.1 %) and f) 13-24-12 + 10 SO3 + ME (1% Zn) compound fertilizer applications. According to the combined variance analysis results, the differences between the applications in terms of beet yield and sugar presence were not found statistically significant. According to the economic analysis, the fertilizer and fertilization costs of lean NPK (15-15-15 and 12-30-12) compound fertilizer applications were found to be 23.23 % lower than secondary and micronutrient added compound fertilizers.

Özet

Bu çalışma, uygulanan farklı form ve bileşimdeki kompoze gübrelerin şeker pancarı (Beta vulgaris L.) verim ve kalite değerlerine etkisini tespit etmek amacıyla 2015 ve 2016 yıllarında Şeker Enstitüsü Etimesgut Deneme İstasyonunda yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada şeker pancarı ( Beta vulgaris L.) verim ve kalite değerlerinin ölçülmesi yanında gübreleme maliyetleri de belirlenmiştir. Denemeler her iki yılda da tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre 4 tekrarlamalı olarak kurulmuştur. Araştırma konuları; a) 12-30-12, b) 15-15-15, c) 13-18-15+2 Mg+10 SO3+ 0.5 B, d) 10-25-20+25 SO3+ ME (% 0.5 Zn), e) 7-18-7+11 SO3+ B+ Mn+Zn (% 0.1) ve f) 13-24-12+10 SO3+ME (% 1 Zn) kompoze gübre uygulamalarından oluşmuştur. Birleştirilmiş varyans analiz sonuçlara göre pancar verimi ve şeker varlığı bakımından uygulamalar arasındaki farklar istatistikî olarak önemli bulunmamıştır. Yapılan gübreleme maliyetine göre ise yalın NPK (15-15-15 ve 12-30-12) kompoze gübre uygulamalarının gübre ve gübreleme maliyeti, ikincil ve mikro besin katkılı kompoze gübrelere göre % 23.23 daha düşük bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

PİŞKİN, A. (2021). The Effect of Compound Fertilizer Applications in Different Forms and Components on Sugar Beet Yield and Quality and Economic Analysis. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 255–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/208215

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Akyar, O. C., Cagatay, M., Kayimoglu, E., Özbek, A., Titiz., S., 1980. Uber die Beziehung zwischen dem bereinigten Zuckergehalt und der chemischen Zusammensetzung der Zuckerrübe. Zuckerindustrie. 105: 457–466. Anonim, 2020. 2019 Tarım Raporu. TŞFAŞ Yayınları. Türkşeker. Yenişehir/ Ankara.
  2. Armstrong, M. J., Milford, G.F. J., 1985 The nitrogen nutrition of sugar beet. British Sugar Beet Review. 53(4), 42–44.
  3. Armstrong, M. J., Jarvıs, P. J., Houghton, B. J., Bellett-Travers, D. M., Jones,J., 2010. Effect of potassium fertilizer on the yield, quality and potassium offtake of sugar beet crops grown on soils of different potassium status. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 135(01):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0021859699007881. Artyszak, A., 2014. The efficiency of foliar boron fertilization of two sugar beet varieties. Part I. The yielding and technological quality of roots. Fragmenta Agronomica, 31:7-18
  4. Baran, F. M., Gokdogan, O., 2016. Determination of energy balance of sugar beet production in Turkey: A case study of Kirklareli Province. Energy E_c, 9, 487–494. doi: 10.1007/s12053-015-9375-x. Barłóg, P., W. Grzebisz, Pepliński, K., Szczepaniak, W., 2013. Sugar Beet Response to Balanced Nitrogen Fertilization with Phosphorus and Potassium Part I. Dynamics of Beet Yield Development. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 19:1311–1318.
  5. Bee, P.M., Jarvıs, P.J., Armstrong, M.J., 1997, The Effect of potassium and sodium fertilizer on sugar beet yield and quality, Proceedings of the 60 th International Institute for Beet Research Congress, July, Cambridge (UK). Burba, M., 1996. Invert sugar and harmful nitrogen as quality parameters of sugar beet. Institute International de Recherches Betteravières Proceedings, 369–383.
  6. Bouyoucos, G. J., 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal,43; 434-438. dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300090005x. Cakmak, I., 2005. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 168: 521–530. doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420485. Çakmak, İ., Kirkby, E. A., 2008. Role of magnesium in carbon partitioning and alleviating photooxidative damage. Physiologia Plantarum, 133: 692-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01042.x. Draycott, A. P., Christenson, D. R., 2003. Nutrients for sugar beet production. Soil-plant relationships. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. Er, C., Başalma, D., İnan, H., Gürel, S., Soyg