SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation, and Interpretation of Preoperative Consultations, Guideline Recommendations and Risk Scoring Systems in Geriatric Patients

Geriyatrik Hastalarda Preoperatif Dönemde İstenilen Konsültasyonların Değerlendirilmesi, Yorumlanması, Kılavuz Önerileri ve Risk Skorlaması

Elvin KESİMCİ
FEVZİ TORAMAN
Pages
1–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We evaluated the consultations, interpretation, guideline recommendations and risk scoring systems in the geriatric population required during the postoperative period

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Evaluation, and Interpretation of Preoperative Consultations, Guideline Recommendations and Risk Scoring Systems in Geriatric PatientsThe incidence of geriatric patients undergoing surgical procedures has been increasing markedly as a result of increase in geriatric population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The anesthetic management of these patients should provide a better understanding of preoperative period and a better and smooth postoperative care, with a specific approach including physiological and psychological age -specific changes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We evaluated the consultations, interpretation, guideline recommendations and risk scoring systems in the geriatric population required during the postoperative period
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Evaluation, and Interpretation of Preoperative Consultations, Guideline Recommendations and Risk Scoring Systems in Geriatric PatientsThe incidence of geriatric patients undergoing surgical procedures has been increasing markedly as a result of increase in geriatric population. The anesthetic management of these patients should provide a better understanding of preoperative period and a better and smooth postoperative care, with a specific approach including physiological and psychological age -specific changes. We evaluated the consultations, interpretation, guideline recommendations and risk scoring systems in the geriatric population required during the postoperative period

Özet

Geriyatrik nüfusun giderek artmasına bağlı olarak, cerrahi tedavi alan geriyatrik hastaların oranı da belirgin şekilde artmaktadır. Bu hastalarda anestezi uygulamaları; yaşlanmaya bağlı ortaya çıkan fizyolojik ve psikolojik değişimleri içine alacak şekilde spesifik bir yaklaşımla preoperatif dönemin daha iyi anlaşılmasını ve postoperatif dönemin daha sorunsuz geçirilmesini sağlamalıdır. Bu derlemede geriyatrik hastalarda preoperatif dönemde istenilen konsültasyonların değerlendirilmesi, yorumlanması, kılavuz önerileri ve risk skorlamaları değerlendirilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

KESİMCİ, E., TORAMAN, F. (2016). Evaluation, and Interpretation of Preoperative Consultations, Guideline Recommendations and Risk Scoring Systems in Geriatric Patients. Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/204333

References (11)

  1. Ersoy A, Çakırgöz M, Türkmen Ü. Geriyatrik anestezi. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi 2013;29:106-9.
  2. Bettelli G. Preoperative evaluation in geriatric surgery: comorbidity, functional status and pharmacological history. Minerva Anestesiol 2011;77:637-46
  3. Edwards AE, Seymour DG, McCarthy JM, Crumplin MK. A 5-year survival study of general surgical patients aged 65 years and over. Anaesthesia 1996;51: 3-10.
  4. Oliver CD, White SA, Platt MW. Surgery for a fractured femur and elective ICU admission at 113 yr of age. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:260-2.
  5. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krogstad D, Murray B, et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 1977;297:845-50.
  6. Gupta PK, Franck C, Miller WJ, Gupta H, Forse RA. Development and validation of a bariatric surgery morbidity risk calculator using the prospective, multicenter NSQIP dataset. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:301-9.
  7. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999;100:1043-9.
  8. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: executive summary: report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Anesth Analg 2008;106:685-712.
  9. Qaseem T. Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:553.
  10. Burgos E, Gómez-Arnau JI, Díez R, Mu-oz L, Fernández-Guisasola J, Garcia del Valle S. Predictive value of six risk scores for outcome after surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:125-31.
  11. Thomas DR, Ritchie CS. Preoperative assessment of older ad